Cargando…
Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke
BACKGROUND: Hand function is often impaired after stroke, strongly affecting the ability to perform daily activities. Upper limb robotic devices have been developed to complement rehabilitation therapy offered to persons who suffered a stroke, but they rarely focus on the training of hand sensorimot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7 |
_version_ | 1783573730744598528 |
---|---|
author | Ranzani, Raffaele Lambercy, Olivier Metzger, Jean-Claude Califfi, Antonella Regazzi, Stefania Dinacci, Daria Petrillo, Claudio Rossi, Paolo Conti, Fabio M. Gassert, Roger |
author_facet | Ranzani, Raffaele Lambercy, Olivier Metzger, Jean-Claude Califfi, Antonella Regazzi, Stefania Dinacci, Daria Petrillo, Claudio Rossi, Paolo Conti, Fabio M. Gassert, Roger |
author_sort | Ranzani, Raffaele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hand function is often impaired after stroke, strongly affecting the ability to perform daily activities. Upper limb robotic devices have been developed to complement rehabilitation therapy offered to persons who suffered a stroke, but they rarely focus on the training of hand sensorimotor function. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate whether robot-assisted therapy of hand function following a neurocognitive approach (i.e., combining motor training with somatosensory and cognitive tasks) produces an equivalent decrease in upper limb motor impairment compared to dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy, when embedded in the rehabilitation program of inpatients in the subacute stage after stroke. METHODS: A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted on subjects with subacute stroke receiving either conventional or robot-assisted neurocognitive hand therapy using a haptic device. Therapy was provided for 15, 45-min sessions over four weeks, nested within the standard therapy program. Primary outcome was the change from baseline in the upper extremity part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) after the intervention, which was compared between groups using equivalence testing. Secondary outcome measures included upper limb motor, sensory and cognitive assessments, delivered therapy dose, as well as questionnaires on user technology acceptance. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants with stroke were enrolled. 14 subjects in the robot-assisted and 13 subjects in the conventional therapy group completed the study. At the end of intervention, week 8 and week 32, the robot-assisted/conventional therapy group improved by 7.14/6.85, 7.79/7.31, and 8.64/8.08 points on the FMA-UE, respectively, establishing that motor recovery in the robot-assisted group is non-inferior to that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive robot-assisted therapy of hand function allows for a non-inferior motor recovery compared to conventional dose-matched neurocognitive therapy when performed during inpatient rehabilitation in the subacute stage. This allows the early familiarization of subjects with stroke to the use of such technologies, as a first step towards minimal therapist supervision in the clinic, or directly at home after hospital discharge, to help increase the dose of hand therapy for persons with stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDAMED database (CIV-13-02-009921), clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02096445). Registered 26 March 2014 – Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02096445 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7444058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74440582020-08-26 Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke Ranzani, Raffaele Lambercy, Olivier Metzger, Jean-Claude Califfi, Antonella Regazzi, Stefania Dinacci, Daria Petrillo, Claudio Rossi, Paolo Conti, Fabio M. Gassert, Roger J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Hand function is often impaired after stroke, strongly affecting the ability to perform daily activities. Upper limb robotic devices have been developed to complement rehabilitation therapy offered to persons who suffered a stroke, but they rarely focus on the training of hand sensorimotor function. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate whether robot-assisted therapy of hand function following a neurocognitive approach (i.e., combining motor training with somatosensory and cognitive tasks) produces an equivalent decrease in upper limb motor impairment compared to dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy, when embedded in the rehabilitation program of inpatients in the subacute stage after stroke. METHODS: A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted on subjects with subacute stroke receiving either conventional or robot-assisted neurocognitive hand therapy using a haptic device. Therapy was provided for 15, 45-min sessions over four weeks, nested within the standard therapy program. Primary outcome was the change from baseline in the upper extremity part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) after the intervention, which was compared between groups using equivalence testing. Secondary outcome measures included upper limb motor, sensory and cognitive assessments, delivered therapy dose, as well as questionnaires on user technology acceptance. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants with stroke were enrolled. 14 subjects in the robot-assisted and 13 subjects in the conventional therapy group completed the study. At the end of intervention, week 8 and week 32, the robot-assisted/conventional therapy group improved by 7.14/6.85, 7.79/7.31, and 8.64/8.08 points on the FMA-UE, respectively, establishing that motor recovery in the robot-assisted group is non-inferior to that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive robot-assisted therapy of hand function allows for a non-inferior motor recovery compared to conventional dose-matched neurocognitive therapy when performed during inpatient rehabilitation in the subacute stage. This allows the early familiarization of subjects with stroke to the use of such technologies, as a first step towards minimal therapist supervision in the clinic, or directly at home after hospital discharge, to help increase the dose of hand therapy for persons with stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDAMED database (CIV-13-02-009921), clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02096445). Registered 26 March 2014 – Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02096445 BioMed Central 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7444058/ /pubmed/32831097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ranzani, Raffaele Lambercy, Olivier Metzger, Jean-Claude Califfi, Antonella Regazzi, Stefania Dinacci, Daria Petrillo, Claudio Rossi, Paolo Conti, Fabio M. Gassert, Roger Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
title | Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
title_full | Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
title_fullStr | Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
title_short | Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
title_sort | neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranzaniraffaele neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT lambercyolivier neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT metzgerjeanclaude neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT califfiantonella neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT regazzistefania neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT dinaccidaria neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT petrilloclaudio neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT rossipaolo neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT contifabiom neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke AT gassertroger neurocognitiverobotassistedrehabilitationofhandfunctionarandomizedcontroltrialonmotorrecoveryinsubacutestroke |