Cargando…
Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators
BACKGROUND: In the scope of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) subgroup was tasked to identify breast cancer screening programme (BCSP) performance indicators, including their acceptable and desirable levels, which are associated with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07289-z |
_version_ | 1783573733607211008 |
---|---|
author | Muratov, Sergei Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Tarride, Jean-Eric Alonso-Coello, Pablo Dimitrova, Nadya Borisch, Bettina Castells, Xavier Duffy, Stephen W. Fitzpatrick, Patricia Follmann, Markus Giordano, Livia Hofvind, Solveig Lebeau, Annette Quinn, Cecily Torresin, Alberto Vialli, Claudia Siesling, Sabine Ponti, Antonio Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Schünemann, Holger Nyström, Lennarth Broeders, Mireille |
author_facet | Muratov, Sergei Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Tarride, Jean-Eric Alonso-Coello, Pablo Dimitrova, Nadya Borisch, Bettina Castells, Xavier Duffy, Stephen W. Fitzpatrick, Patricia Follmann, Markus Giordano, Livia Hofvind, Solveig Lebeau, Annette Quinn, Cecily Torresin, Alberto Vialli, Claudia Siesling, Sabine Ponti, Antonio Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Schünemann, Holger Nyström, Lennarth Broeders, Mireille |
author_sort | Muratov, Sergei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the scope of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) subgroup was tasked to identify breast cancer screening programme (BCSP) performance indicators, including their acceptable and desirable levels, which are associated with breast cancer (BC) mortality. This paper documents the methodology used for the indicator selection. METHODS: The indicators were identified through a multi-stage process. First, a scoping review was conducted to identify existing performance indicators. Second, building on existing frameworks for making well-informed health care choices, a specific conceptual framework was developed to guide the indicator selection. Third, two group exercises including a rating and ranking survey were conducted for indicator selection using pre-determined criteria, such as: relevance, measurability, accurateness, ethics and understandability. The selected indicators were mapped onto a BC screening pathway developed by the M&E subgroup to illustrate the steps of BC screening common to all EU countries. RESULTS: A total of 96 indicators were identified from an initial list of 1325 indicators. After removing redundant and irrelevant indicators and adding those missing, 39 candidate indicators underwent the rating and ranking exercise. Based on the results, the M&E subgroup selected 13 indicators: screening coverage, participation rate, recall rate, breast cancer detection rate, invasive breast cancer detection rate, cancers > 20 mm, cancers ≤10 mm, lymph node status, interval cancer rate, episode sensitivity, time interval between screening and first treatment, benign open surgical biopsy rate, and mastectomy rate. CONCLUSION: This systematic approach led to the identification of 13 BCSP candidate performance indicators to be further evaluated for their association with BC mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7444070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74440702020-08-26 Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators Muratov, Sergei Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Tarride, Jean-Eric Alonso-Coello, Pablo Dimitrova, Nadya Borisch, Bettina Castells, Xavier Duffy, Stephen W. Fitzpatrick, Patricia Follmann, Markus Giordano, Livia Hofvind, Solveig Lebeau, Annette Quinn, Cecily Torresin, Alberto Vialli, Claudia Siesling, Sabine Ponti, Antonio Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Schünemann, Holger Nyström, Lennarth Broeders, Mireille BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: In the scope of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) subgroup was tasked to identify breast cancer screening programme (BCSP) performance indicators, including their acceptable and desirable levels, which are associated with breast cancer (BC) mortality. This paper documents the methodology used for the indicator selection. METHODS: The indicators were identified through a multi-stage process. First, a scoping review was conducted to identify existing performance indicators. Second, building on existing frameworks for making well-informed health care choices, a specific conceptual framework was developed to guide the indicator selection. Third, two group exercises including a rating and ranking survey were conducted for indicator selection using pre-determined criteria, such as: relevance, measurability, accurateness, ethics and understandability. The selected indicators were mapped onto a BC screening pathway developed by the M&E subgroup to illustrate the steps of BC screening common to all EU countries. RESULTS: A total of 96 indicators were identified from an initial list of 1325 indicators. After removing redundant and irrelevant indicators and adding those missing, 39 candidate indicators underwent the rating and ranking exercise. Based on the results, the M&E subgroup selected 13 indicators: screening coverage, participation rate, recall rate, breast cancer detection rate, invasive breast cancer detection rate, cancers > 20 mm, cancers ≤10 mm, lymph node status, interval cancer rate, episode sensitivity, time interval between screening and first treatment, benign open surgical biopsy rate, and mastectomy rate. CONCLUSION: This systematic approach led to the identification of 13 BCSP candidate performance indicators to be further evaluated for their association with BC mortality. BioMed Central 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7444070/ /pubmed/32831048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07289-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Muratov, Sergei Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Tarride, Jean-Eric Alonso-Coello, Pablo Dimitrova, Nadya Borisch, Bettina Castells, Xavier Duffy, Stephen W. Fitzpatrick, Patricia Follmann, Markus Giordano, Livia Hofvind, Solveig Lebeau, Annette Quinn, Cecily Torresin, Alberto Vialli, Claudia Siesling, Sabine Ponti, Antonio Giorgi Rossi, Paolo Schünemann, Holger Nyström, Lennarth Broeders, Mireille Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
title | Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
title_full | Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
title_fullStr | Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
title_short | Monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
title_sort | monitoring and evaluation of breast cancer screening programmes: selecting candidate performance indicators |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07289-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muratovsergei monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT caneloaybarcarlos monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT tarridejeaneric monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT alonsocoellopablo monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT dimitrovanadya monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT borischbettina monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT castellsxavier monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT duffystephenw monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT fitzpatrickpatricia monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT follmannmarkus monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT giordanolivia monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT hofvindsolveig monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT lebeauannette monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT quinncecily monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT torresinalberto monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT vialliclaudia monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT sieslingsabine monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT pontiantonio monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT giorgirossipaolo monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT schunemannholger monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT nystromlennarth monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT broedersmireille monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators AT monitoringandevaluationofbreastcancerscreeningprogrammesselectingcandidateperformanceindicators |