Cargando…

The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects

Prior to observing low-dose-induced cell signaling and adaptive protection, radiogenic stochastic effects were assumed to be linearly related to absorbed dose. Now, abundant data prove the occurrence of radiogenic adaptive protection specifically at doses below ∼ 200 mGy (with some data suggesting s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waltar, Alan, Feinendegen, Ludwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820949729
_version_ 1783573743902130176
author Waltar, Alan
Feinendegen, Ludwig
author_facet Waltar, Alan
Feinendegen, Ludwig
author_sort Waltar, Alan
collection PubMed
description Prior to observing low-dose-induced cell signaling and adaptive protection, radiogenic stochastic effects were assumed to be linearly related to absorbed dose. Now, abundant data prove the occurrence of radiogenic adaptive protection specifically at doses below ∼ 200 mGy (with some data suggesting such protection at a dose even higher than 200 mGy). Moreover, cells do not thrive properly when deprived of radiation below background dose. Two threshold doses need be considered in constructing a valid dose-response relationship. With doses beginning to rise from zero, cells increasingly escape radiation deprivation. The dose at which radiation-deprived cells begin to function homeostatically provides dose Threshold A. With further dose increase, adaptive protection becomes prominent and then largely disappears at acute doses above ∼ 200 mGy. The dose at which damage begins to override protection defines Threshold B. Thresholds A and B should be terms in modeling dose-response functions. Regarding whole-body responses, current data suggest for low-LET acute, non-chronic, irradiation a Threshold B of about 100 mGy prevails, except for leukemia and probably some other malignancies, and for chronic, low dose-rate irradiation where the Threshold B may well reach 1 Gy per year. A new Research and Development Program should determine individual Thresholds A and B for various radiogenic cell responses depending on radiation quality and target.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74441252020-09-09 The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects Waltar, Alan Feinendegen, Ludwig Dose Response Commentary Prior to observing low-dose-induced cell signaling and adaptive protection, radiogenic stochastic effects were assumed to be linearly related to absorbed dose. Now, abundant data prove the occurrence of radiogenic adaptive protection specifically at doses below ∼ 200 mGy (with some data suggesting such protection at a dose even higher than 200 mGy). Moreover, cells do not thrive properly when deprived of radiation below background dose. Two threshold doses need be considered in constructing a valid dose-response relationship. With doses beginning to rise from zero, cells increasingly escape radiation deprivation. The dose at which radiation-deprived cells begin to function homeostatically provides dose Threshold A. With further dose increase, adaptive protection becomes prominent and then largely disappears at acute doses above ∼ 200 mGy. The dose at which damage begins to override protection defines Threshold B. Thresholds A and B should be terms in modeling dose-response functions. Regarding whole-body responses, current data suggest for low-LET acute, non-chronic, irradiation a Threshold B of about 100 mGy prevails, except for leukemia and probably some other malignancies, and for chronic, low dose-rate irradiation where the Threshold B may well reach 1 Gy per year. A new Research and Development Program should determine individual Thresholds A and B for various radiogenic cell responses depending on radiation quality and target. SAGE Publications 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7444125/ /pubmed/32913426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820949729 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Commentary
Waltar, Alan
Feinendegen, Ludwig
The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
title The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
title_full The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
title_fullStr The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
title_full_unstemmed The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
title_short The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
title_sort double threshold: consequences for identifying low-dose radiation effects
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820949729
work_keys_str_mv AT waltaralan thedoublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects
AT feinendegenludwig thedoublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects
AT waltaralan doublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects
AT feinendegenludwig doublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects