Cargando…
The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects
Prior to observing low-dose-induced cell signaling and adaptive protection, radiogenic stochastic effects were assumed to be linearly related to absorbed dose. Now, abundant data prove the occurrence of radiogenic adaptive protection specifically at doses below ∼ 200 mGy (with some data suggesting s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820949729 |
_version_ | 1783573743902130176 |
---|---|
author | Waltar, Alan Feinendegen, Ludwig |
author_facet | Waltar, Alan Feinendegen, Ludwig |
author_sort | Waltar, Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prior to observing low-dose-induced cell signaling and adaptive protection, radiogenic stochastic effects were assumed to be linearly related to absorbed dose. Now, abundant data prove the occurrence of radiogenic adaptive protection specifically at doses below ∼ 200 mGy (with some data suggesting such protection at a dose even higher than 200 mGy). Moreover, cells do not thrive properly when deprived of radiation below background dose. Two threshold doses need be considered in constructing a valid dose-response relationship. With doses beginning to rise from zero, cells increasingly escape radiation deprivation. The dose at which radiation-deprived cells begin to function homeostatically provides dose Threshold A. With further dose increase, adaptive protection becomes prominent and then largely disappears at acute doses above ∼ 200 mGy. The dose at which damage begins to override protection defines Threshold B. Thresholds A and B should be terms in modeling dose-response functions. Regarding whole-body responses, current data suggest for low-LET acute, non-chronic, irradiation a Threshold B of about 100 mGy prevails, except for leukemia and probably some other malignancies, and for chronic, low dose-rate irradiation where the Threshold B may well reach 1 Gy per year. A new Research and Development Program should determine individual Thresholds A and B for various radiogenic cell responses depending on radiation quality and target. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7444125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74441252020-09-09 The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects Waltar, Alan Feinendegen, Ludwig Dose Response Commentary Prior to observing low-dose-induced cell signaling and adaptive protection, radiogenic stochastic effects were assumed to be linearly related to absorbed dose. Now, abundant data prove the occurrence of radiogenic adaptive protection specifically at doses below ∼ 200 mGy (with some data suggesting such protection at a dose even higher than 200 mGy). Moreover, cells do not thrive properly when deprived of radiation below background dose. Two threshold doses need be considered in constructing a valid dose-response relationship. With doses beginning to rise from zero, cells increasingly escape radiation deprivation. The dose at which radiation-deprived cells begin to function homeostatically provides dose Threshold A. With further dose increase, adaptive protection becomes prominent and then largely disappears at acute doses above ∼ 200 mGy. The dose at which damage begins to override protection defines Threshold B. Thresholds A and B should be terms in modeling dose-response functions. Regarding whole-body responses, current data suggest for low-LET acute, non-chronic, irradiation a Threshold B of about 100 mGy prevails, except for leukemia and probably some other malignancies, and for chronic, low dose-rate irradiation where the Threshold B may well reach 1 Gy per year. A new Research and Development Program should determine individual Thresholds A and B for various radiogenic cell responses depending on radiation quality and target. SAGE Publications 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7444125/ /pubmed/32913426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820949729 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Waltar, Alan Feinendegen, Ludwig The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects |
title | The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects |
title_full | The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects |
title_fullStr | The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects |
title_full_unstemmed | The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects |
title_short | The Double Threshold: Consequences for Identifying Low-Dose Radiation Effects |
title_sort | double threshold: consequences for identifying low-dose radiation effects |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325820949729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waltaralan thedoublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects AT feinendegenludwig thedoublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects AT waltaralan doublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects AT feinendegenludwig doublethresholdconsequencesforidentifyinglowdoseradiationeffects |