Cargando…

Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vaginitis, also known as vulvovaginitis, is an inflammation of the vagina and vulva and a common disease in females. It is thought to be caused by vaginal dysbiosis and improved by probiotics. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) are the major types of vaginal infections. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeng, Huey-Sheng, Yan, Tsong-Rong, Chen, Jing-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9090
_version_ 1783573795101999104
author Jeng, Huey-Sheng
Yan, Tsong-Rong
Chen, Jing-Yi
author_facet Jeng, Huey-Sheng
Yan, Tsong-Rong
Chen, Jing-Yi
author_sort Jeng, Huey-Sheng
collection PubMed
description Vaginitis, also known as vulvovaginitis, is an inflammation of the vagina and vulva and a common disease in females. It is thought to be caused by vaginal dysbiosis and improved by probiotics. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) are the major types of vaginal infections. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of common vaginal infections in non-pregnant females. Literature on randomized controlled trials and two-armed prospective studies on any intervention with probiotics published until December 24th, 2018 was searched in the PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases. The outcomes of interest were recurrence rate, cure rate, remission rate and normal vaginal flora restoration. Finally, a total of 30 studies on bacterial vaginosis (BV) and/or VVC were included and stratified into 3 study types based on treatment design as follows: Type I, antibiotic/probiotics vs. antibiotics/antifungals (22 studies); Type II, probiotics vs. placebo (5 studies); Type III, probiotics vs. antibiotics (3 studies). The type I studies comprised 1,788 non-pregnant females and had the highest inter-study comparability in post-treatment follow-up design and meta-analysis outcome data. Probiotics interventions were significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate of vaginitis [pooled odds ratio (OR)=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, P<0.001] and higher cure/remission rate (pooled OR=2.28, 95% CI: 1.20-4.32, P=0.011). However, a significant increase in normal vaginal flora after probiotic treatment was observed only in BV (pooled OR=4.55, 95% CI: 1.44-14.35, P=0.01). In addition, supportive but heterogeneous results were obtained from the 6-month follow-up data of Type-I studies, different infection types and supplementary analysis of Type-II studies. In conclusion, probiotics have a significant short-term effect in the treatment of common vaginal infections in non-pregnant females. In order to evaluate the long-term effects of probiotics in common vaginal infections, it is worthwhile to perform higher-quality clinical trials in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74443812020-08-26 Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis Jeng, Huey-Sheng Yan, Tsong-Rong Chen, Jing-Yi Exp Ther Med Articles Vaginitis, also known as vulvovaginitis, is an inflammation of the vagina and vulva and a common disease in females. It is thought to be caused by vaginal dysbiosis and improved by probiotics. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) are the major types of vaginal infections. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of common vaginal infections in non-pregnant females. Literature on randomized controlled trials and two-armed prospective studies on any intervention with probiotics published until December 24th, 2018 was searched in the PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases. The outcomes of interest were recurrence rate, cure rate, remission rate and normal vaginal flora restoration. Finally, a total of 30 studies on bacterial vaginosis (BV) and/or VVC were included and stratified into 3 study types based on treatment design as follows: Type I, antibiotic/probiotics vs. antibiotics/antifungals (22 studies); Type II, probiotics vs. placebo (5 studies); Type III, probiotics vs. antibiotics (3 studies). The type I studies comprised 1,788 non-pregnant females and had the highest inter-study comparability in post-treatment follow-up design and meta-analysis outcome data. Probiotics interventions were significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate of vaginitis [pooled odds ratio (OR)=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.41, P<0.001] and higher cure/remission rate (pooled OR=2.28, 95% CI: 1.20-4.32, P=0.011). However, a significant increase in normal vaginal flora after probiotic treatment was observed only in BV (pooled OR=4.55, 95% CI: 1.44-14.35, P=0.01). In addition, supportive but heterogeneous results were obtained from the 6-month follow-up data of Type-I studies, different infection types and supplementary analysis of Type-II studies. In conclusion, probiotics have a significant short-term effect in the treatment of common vaginal infections in non-pregnant females. In order to evaluate the long-term effects of probiotics in common vaginal infections, it is worthwhile to perform higher-quality clinical trials in the future. D.A. Spandidos 2020-10 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7444381/ /pubmed/32855726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9090 Text en Copyright: © Jeng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Jeng, Huey-Sheng
Yan, Tsong-Rong
Chen, Jing-Yi
Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort treating vaginitis with probiotics in non-pregnant females: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9090
work_keys_str_mv AT jenghueysheng treatingvaginitiswithprobioticsinnonpregnantfemalesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yantsongrong treatingvaginitiswithprobioticsinnonpregnantfemalesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjingyi treatingvaginitiswithprobioticsinnonpregnantfemalesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis