Cargando…
New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: In the last 20 years, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become available for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and a treat-to-target strategy has been introduced. We hypothesise that these advances should have resulted in changes to t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01435-6 |
_version_ | 1783573799339294720 |
---|---|
author | Caporali, Roberto Fakhouri, Walid K. H. Nicolay, Claudia Longley, Harriet J. Losi, Serena Rogai, Veronica |
author_facet | Caporali, Roberto Fakhouri, Walid K. H. Nicolay, Claudia Longley, Harriet J. Losi, Serena Rogai, Veronica |
author_sort | Caporali, Roberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In the last 20 years, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become available for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and a treat-to-target strategy has been introduced. We hypothesise that these advances should have resulted in changes to the characteristics of patients with RA participating in clinical trials of the newest therapies. This study determined whether the baseline characteristics of patients with RA enrolled in clinical trials have changed in the past decade versus patients participating in earlier RA studies. METHODS: This secondary analysis was based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified in a systematic literature review. Baseline characteristics of patients with RA with inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs were compared between RCTs published in 1999–2009 and those published in 2010–2017 using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Forty RCTs were analysed: 22 from 1999–2009 and 18 from 2010–2017. No significant difference between the two timeframes and no obvious trend over time were observed for age, gender, disease duration, rheumatoid factor status, tender and swollen joint counts, physician and patient global assessments of disease activity, and pain scores. Variability between RCTs was high. Similar results were observed for Disease Activity Scores and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores, but with low variability between RCTs. CONCLUSION: The baseline characteristics of patients with RA participating in RCTs do not appear to have changed in the last decade despite the availability of new treatments and a different treatment approach. Further research should determine the impact of baseline patient characteristics on patients’ response to RA treatments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01435-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7444401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74444012020-08-31 New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review Caporali, Roberto Fakhouri, Walid K. H. Nicolay, Claudia Longley, Harriet J. Losi, Serena Rogai, Veronica Adv Ther Review INTRODUCTION: In the last 20 years, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become available for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and a treat-to-target strategy has been introduced. We hypothesise that these advances should have resulted in changes to the characteristics of patients with RA participating in clinical trials of the newest therapies. This study determined whether the baseline characteristics of patients with RA enrolled in clinical trials have changed in the past decade versus patients participating in earlier RA studies. METHODS: This secondary analysis was based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified in a systematic literature review. Baseline characteristics of patients with RA with inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs were compared between RCTs published in 1999–2009 and those published in 2010–2017 using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Forty RCTs were analysed: 22 from 1999–2009 and 18 from 2010–2017. No significant difference between the two timeframes and no obvious trend over time were observed for age, gender, disease duration, rheumatoid factor status, tender and swollen joint counts, physician and patient global assessments of disease activity, and pain scores. Variability between RCTs was high. Similar results were observed for Disease Activity Scores and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores, but with low variability between RCTs. CONCLUSION: The baseline characteristics of patients with RA participating in RCTs do not appear to have changed in the last decade despite the availability of new treatments and a different treatment approach. Further research should determine the impact of baseline patient characteristics on patients’ response to RA treatments. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01435-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-07-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7444401/ /pubmed/32705531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01435-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Caporali, Roberto Fakhouri, Walid K. H. Nicolay, Claudia Longley, Harriet J. Losi, Serena Rogai, Veronica New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review |
title | New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review |
title_full | New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review |
title_short | New Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatments for ‘Old’ Patients: Results of a Systematic Review |
title_sort | new rheumatoid arthritis treatments for ‘old’ patients: results of a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01435-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caporaliroberto newrheumatoidarthritistreatmentsforoldpatientsresultsofasystematicreview AT fakhouriwalidkh newrheumatoidarthritistreatmentsforoldpatientsresultsofasystematicreview AT nicolayclaudia newrheumatoidarthritistreatmentsforoldpatientsresultsofasystematicreview AT longleyharrietj newrheumatoidarthritistreatmentsforoldpatientsresultsofasystematicreview AT losiserena newrheumatoidarthritistreatmentsforoldpatientsresultsofasystematicreview AT rogaiveronica newrheumatoidarthritistreatmentsforoldpatientsresultsofasystematicreview |