Cargando…

Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The present study aimed to determine whether there is any difference in the efficacy and safety of once-daily vs. twice-daily enoxaparin when used for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct and Google...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Jingrong, Song, Yixiao, Li, Chunmin, Ren, Hualiang, Zhang, Wangde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9036
_version_ 1783573803440275456
author Niu, Jingrong
Song, Yixiao
Li, Chunmin
Ren, Hualiang
Zhang, Wangde
author_facet Niu, Jingrong
Song, Yixiao
Li, Chunmin
Ren, Hualiang
Zhang, Wangde
author_sort Niu, Jingrong
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to determine whether there is any difference in the efficacy and safety of once-daily vs. twice-daily enoxaparin when used for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies comparing once-daily and twice-daily enoxaparin for the initial treatment of VTE added from inception up to 1st October 2019. Studies utilizing any other low-molecular-weight heparin and using enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis were excluded. A total of 6 studies were included in the systematic review and 5 in the meta-analysis. Only one study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Pooled analysis of 460 patients receiving once-daily enoxaparin and 464 patients receiving twice-daily enoxaparin indicated no significant difference between the two dosing regimens regarding VTE recurrence [odds ratio (OR)=1.48, 95%CI: 0.75-2.89, P=0.26; I(2)=0%]. No significant difference in major hemorrhagic complications was noted (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 0.52-2.81, P=0.66; I(2)=0%). Sub-group analysis based on study type and use of enoxaparin for bridging therapy did not change the overall results. In cancer patients, no statistically significant difference in the recurrence of VTE was obtained between once-daily and twice-daily enoxaparin, but the confidence intervals were wide with a tendency to favor twice-daily dosing (OR=2.28, 95%CI: 0.91-5.75, P=0.08; I(2)=0%). The overall quality of the studies was determined to be average. To conclude, while the present results suggested no significant difference in efficacy and safety of once-daily vs. twice-daily enoxaparin when used for the initial treatment of VTE, the quality of the evidence may not have been sufficiently high to support the conclusions with confidence. Further high-quality and adequately powered RCTs are required to corroborate the present results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74444202020-08-26 Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis Niu, Jingrong Song, Yixiao Li, Chunmin Ren, Hualiang Zhang, Wangde Exp Ther Med Articles The present study aimed to determine whether there is any difference in the efficacy and safety of once-daily vs. twice-daily enoxaparin when used for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies comparing once-daily and twice-daily enoxaparin for the initial treatment of VTE added from inception up to 1st October 2019. Studies utilizing any other low-molecular-weight heparin and using enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis were excluded. A total of 6 studies were included in the systematic review and 5 in the meta-analysis. Only one study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Pooled analysis of 460 patients receiving once-daily enoxaparin and 464 patients receiving twice-daily enoxaparin indicated no significant difference between the two dosing regimens regarding VTE recurrence [odds ratio (OR)=1.48, 95%CI: 0.75-2.89, P=0.26; I(2)=0%]. No significant difference in major hemorrhagic complications was noted (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 0.52-2.81, P=0.66; I(2)=0%). Sub-group analysis based on study type and use of enoxaparin for bridging therapy did not change the overall results. In cancer patients, no statistically significant difference in the recurrence of VTE was obtained between once-daily and twice-daily enoxaparin, but the confidence intervals were wide with a tendency to favor twice-daily dosing (OR=2.28, 95%CI: 0.91-5.75, P=0.08; I(2)=0%). The overall quality of the studies was determined to be average. To conclude, while the present results suggested no significant difference in efficacy and safety of once-daily vs. twice-daily enoxaparin when used for the initial treatment of VTE, the quality of the evidence may not have been sufficiently high to support the conclusions with confidence. Further high-quality and adequately powered RCTs are required to corroborate the present results. D.A. Spandidos 2020-10 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7444420/ /pubmed/32855676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9036 Text en Copyright: © Niu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Niu, Jingrong
Song, Yixiao
Li, Chunmin
Ren, Hualiang
Zhang, Wangde
Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort once-daily vs. twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for the management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9036
work_keys_str_mv AT niujingrong oncedailyvstwicedailydosingofenoxaparinforthemanagementofvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songyixiao oncedailyvstwicedailydosingofenoxaparinforthemanagementofvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lichunmin oncedailyvstwicedailydosingofenoxaparinforthemanagementofvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renhualiang oncedailyvstwicedailydosingofenoxaparinforthemanagementofvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangwangde oncedailyvstwicedailydosingofenoxaparinforthemanagementofvenousthromboembolismasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis