Cargando…

Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?

Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klenk, Michael, Duijf, Hein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32863740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0
_version_ 1783573849011388416
author Klenk, Michael
Duijf, Hein
author_facet Klenk, Michael
Duijf, Hein
author_sort Klenk, Michael
collection PubMed
description Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective is not solely to maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public trust.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74446772020-08-26 Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? Klenk, Michael Duijf, Hein Ethics Inf Technol Original Paper Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective is not solely to maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public trust. Springer Netherlands 2020-08-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7444677/ /pubmed/32863740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Klenk, Michael
Duijf, Hein
Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
title Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
title_full Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
title_fullStr Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
title_full_unstemmed Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
title_short Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
title_sort ethics of digital contact tracing and covid-19: who is (not) free to go?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32863740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0
work_keys_str_mv AT klenkmichael ethicsofdigitalcontacttracingandcovid19whoisnotfreetogo
AT duijfhein ethicsofdigitalcontacttracingandcovid19whoisnotfreetogo