Cargando…
Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?
Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32863740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0 |
_version_ | 1783573849011388416 |
---|---|
author | Klenk, Michael Duijf, Hein |
author_facet | Klenk, Michael Duijf, Hein |
author_sort | Klenk, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective is not solely to maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public trust. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7444677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74446772020-08-26 Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? Klenk, Michael Duijf, Hein Ethics Inf Technol Original Paper Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective is not solely to maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public trust. Springer Netherlands 2020-08-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7444677/ /pubmed/32863740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Klenk, Michael Duijf, Hein Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? |
title | Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? |
title_full | Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? |
title_fullStr | Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? |
title_short | Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? |
title_sort | ethics of digital contact tracing and covid-19: who is (not) free to go? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32863740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klenkmichael ethicsofdigitalcontacttracingandcovid19whoisnotfreetogo AT duijfhein ethicsofdigitalcontacttracingandcovid19whoisnotfreetogo |