Cargando…

Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition

Objective Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is a common diagnostic tool used to evaluate diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). We sought to determine whether there is a difference between the composition of CSF sampled from an external ventricular drain (EVD) and lumbar drain (LD) and wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podkovik, Stacey, Kashyap, Samir, Wiginton, James, Kang, Christine, Mo, Kevin, Goodrich, Mackenzie, Wolberg, Adam, Wacker, Margaret Rose, Miulli, Dan E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850195
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9315
_version_ 1783573860623319040
author Podkovik, Stacey
Kashyap, Samir
Wiginton, James
Kang, Christine
Mo, Kevin
Goodrich, Mackenzie
Wolberg, Adam
Wacker, Margaret Rose
Miulli, Dan E
author_facet Podkovik, Stacey
Kashyap, Samir
Wiginton, James
Kang, Christine
Mo, Kevin
Goodrich, Mackenzie
Wolberg, Adam
Wacker, Margaret Rose
Miulli, Dan E
author_sort Podkovik, Stacey
collection PubMed
description Objective Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is a common diagnostic tool used to evaluate diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). We sought to determine whether there is a difference between the composition of CSF sampled from an external ventricular drain (EVD) and lumbar drain (LD) and whether this made a difference in guiding therapeutic decisions. Patients and Methods This study was a retrospective analysis from a single neurosurgery service between the dates of January 2011 and April 2019. A total of 12,134 patients were screened. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and the presence of both an EVD and LD. Exclusion criteria were not having both routes of CSF sampling and the inability to determine which samples originated from which compartment. Results Six patients underwent simultaneous spinal and ventricular routine CSF sampling <24 hours apart and were analyzed for their compositions. There were 42 samples, but only 20 paired EVD-LD samples that could be analyzed. When comparing the EVD and LD sample compositions, there were statistically significant differences in white blood cells (WBCs; p = 0.040), total protein (p = 0.042), and glucose (p = 0.043). Red blood cells (RBCs; p = 0.104) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN; p = 0.544) were not statistically significant. We found a statistically significant correlation between cranial and spinal CSF WBC (r = 0.944, p < 0.001), protein (r = 0.679, p = 0.001), and glucose (r = 0.805, p < 0.001). We also found that there was a significant correlation between CSF and serum glucose (r = 0.502, p = 0.040). There was no statistically significant correlation between RBCs (r = 0.276, p = 0.252). Conclusion Our results demonstrate a correlation between the cranial and spinal CSF samples, except for RBCs, with statistically significant differences in WBC, glucose, and protein values between the two sites. This confirms that sampling CSF via lumbar puncture, which carries less risk than a ventriculostomy and provides accurate data to help establish a diagnosis for intracranial pathologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74447422020-08-25 Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition Podkovik, Stacey Kashyap, Samir Wiginton, James Kang, Christine Mo, Kevin Goodrich, Mackenzie Wolberg, Adam Wacker, Margaret Rose Miulli, Dan E Cureus Neurology Objective Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is a common diagnostic tool used to evaluate diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). We sought to determine whether there is a difference between the composition of CSF sampled from an external ventricular drain (EVD) and lumbar drain (LD) and whether this made a difference in guiding therapeutic decisions. Patients and Methods This study was a retrospective analysis from a single neurosurgery service between the dates of January 2011 and April 2019. A total of 12,134 patients were screened. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and the presence of both an EVD and LD. Exclusion criteria were not having both routes of CSF sampling and the inability to determine which samples originated from which compartment. Results Six patients underwent simultaneous spinal and ventricular routine CSF sampling <24 hours apart and were analyzed for their compositions. There were 42 samples, but only 20 paired EVD-LD samples that could be analyzed. When comparing the EVD and LD sample compositions, there were statistically significant differences in white blood cells (WBCs; p = 0.040), total protein (p = 0.042), and glucose (p = 0.043). Red blood cells (RBCs; p = 0.104) and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN; p = 0.544) were not statistically significant. We found a statistically significant correlation between cranial and spinal CSF WBC (r = 0.944, p < 0.001), protein (r = 0.679, p = 0.001), and glucose (r = 0.805, p < 0.001). We also found that there was a significant correlation between CSF and serum glucose (r = 0.502, p = 0.040). There was no statistically significant correlation between RBCs (r = 0.276, p = 0.252). Conclusion Our results demonstrate a correlation between the cranial and spinal CSF samples, except for RBCs, with statistically significant differences in WBC, glucose, and protein values between the two sites. This confirms that sampling CSF via lumbar puncture, which carries less risk than a ventriculostomy and provides accurate data to help establish a diagnosis for intracranial pathologies. Cureus 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7444742/ /pubmed/32850195 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9315 Text en Copyright © 2020, Podkovik et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurology
Podkovik, Stacey
Kashyap, Samir
Wiginton, James
Kang, Christine
Mo, Kevin
Goodrich, Mackenzie
Wolberg, Adam
Wacker, Margaret Rose
Miulli, Dan E
Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition
title Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition
title_full Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition
title_fullStr Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition
title_short Comparison of Ventricular and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Composition
title_sort comparison of ventricular and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid composition
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850195
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9315
work_keys_str_mv AT podkovikstacey comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT kashyapsamir comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT wigintonjames comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT kangchristine comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT mokevin comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT goodrichmackenzie comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT wolbergadam comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT wackermargaretrose comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition
AT miullidane comparisonofventricularandlumbarcerebrospinalfluidcomposition