Cargando…

Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum

OBJECTIVE: To determine sound levels resulting from aural suctioning of the external auditory canal. METHODS: Unweighted decibels (dB) and A‐weighted decibels (dBA) sound pressure level measurements were recorded using a retrotympanic microphone in cadaveric human temporal bones. Sound measurements...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Allen, Reeve, Nathaniel H., Yang, Albert, Kahane, Jacob, Cross, Chad, Albanese, Anita, Ng, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.432
_version_ 1783573866209083392
author Young, Allen
Reeve, Nathaniel H.
Yang, Albert
Kahane, Jacob
Cross, Chad
Albanese, Anita
Ng, Matthew
author_facet Young, Allen
Reeve, Nathaniel H.
Yang, Albert
Kahane, Jacob
Cross, Chad
Albanese, Anita
Ng, Matthew
author_sort Young, Allen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine sound levels resulting from aural suctioning of the external auditory canal. METHODS: Unweighted decibels (dB) and A‐weighted decibels (dBA) sound pressure level measurements were recorded using a retrotympanic microphone in cadaveric human temporal bones. Sound measurements were made with common otologic suctions, size 3, 5, and 7 French, within the external ear canal at the tympanic membrane, 5, and 10 mm from the tympanic membrane in the dry condition. In the wet condition, the ear canal was filled with fluid and completely suctioned clear to determine sound effects of suctioning liquid from the ear canal. RESULTS: Sound levels generated from ear canal suctioning ranged from 68.3 to 97 dB and 62.6 to 95.1 dBA. Otologic suctions positioned closer to the tympanic membrane resulted in louder sound levels, but was not statistically significant (P > .05). Using larger diameter suctions generated louder dB and dBA sound levels (P < .001) and the addition of liquid in the ear canal during the suction process generated louder dB and dBA sound levels (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller caliber suction sizes and nonsuctioning techniques should be utilized for in‐office aural toilet to reduce noise trauma and patient discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74447862020-08-28 Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum Young, Allen Reeve, Nathaniel H. Yang, Albert Kahane, Jacob Cross, Chad Albanese, Anita Ng, Matthew Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To determine sound levels resulting from aural suctioning of the external auditory canal. METHODS: Unweighted decibels (dB) and A‐weighted decibels (dBA) sound pressure level measurements were recorded using a retrotympanic microphone in cadaveric human temporal bones. Sound measurements were made with common otologic suctions, size 3, 5, and 7 French, within the external ear canal at the tympanic membrane, 5, and 10 mm from the tympanic membrane in the dry condition. In the wet condition, the ear canal was filled with fluid and completely suctioned clear to determine sound effects of suctioning liquid from the ear canal. RESULTS: Sound levels generated from ear canal suctioning ranged from 68.3 to 97 dB and 62.6 to 95.1 dBA. Otologic suctions positioned closer to the tympanic membrane resulted in louder sound levels, but was not statistically significant (P > .05). Using larger diameter suctions generated louder dB and dBA sound levels (P < .001) and the addition of liquid in the ear canal during the suction process generated louder dB and dBA sound levels (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Smaller caliber suction sizes and nonsuctioning techniques should be utilized for in‐office aural toilet to reduce noise trauma and patient discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7444786/ /pubmed/32864450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.432 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Young, Allen
Reeve, Nathaniel H.
Yang, Albert
Kahane, Jacob
Cross, Chad
Albanese, Anita
Ng, Matthew
Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
title Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
title_full Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
title_fullStr Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
title_full_unstemmed Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
title_short Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
title_sort sound levels with aural suctioning: effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.432
work_keys_str_mv AT youngallen soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum
AT reevenathanielh soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum
AT yangalbert soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum
AT kahanejacob soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum
AT crosschad soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum
AT albaneseanita soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum
AT ngmatthew soundlevelswithauralsuctioningeffectsofsuctionsizecanalmoistureanddistancefromtheeardrum