Cargando…
Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
OBJECTIVES: How reconstruction affects function following total laryngectomy is unclear. This study seeks to determine whether reconstruction method is associated with differences in swallowing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of reconstruction technique in patients undergoing TL was compared...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.430 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: How reconstruction affects function following total laryngectomy is unclear. This study seeks to determine whether reconstruction method is associated with differences in swallowing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of reconstruction technique in patients undergoing TL was compared by pharyngeal transit time (PTT), patient‐reported dysphagia (EAT‐10), and diet‐tolerated (FOIS). RESULTS: Ninety‐five patients met inclusion criteria, with 40 patients (42.1%) undergoing primary closure and 55 patients (57.9%) undergoing tissue transfer. There was no difference in EAT‐10 scores between the groups (P = .09). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving oral diet (FOIS >3) with primary closure (P = .003). Patients undergoing PMC vs free flap had similar rates of g‐tube dependency. Primary closure had the shortest PTT (1.89 seconds) compared to free flap (3.47‐4.65 seconds) or PMC (5.1 seconds; P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: When primary closure is achievable, these results suggest improved swallowing outcomes with better tolerance of oral diet and shorter pharyngeal transit times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV |
---|