Cargando…

Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes

OBJECTIVES: How reconstruction affects function following total laryngectomy is unclear. This study seeks to determine whether reconstruction method is associated with differences in swallowing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of reconstruction technique in patients undergoing TL was compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Brianna N., Hoshal, Steven G., Evangelista, Lisa, Kuhn, Maggie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.430
_version_ 1783573867829133312
author Harris, Brianna N.
Hoshal, Steven G.
Evangelista, Lisa
Kuhn, Maggie
author_facet Harris, Brianna N.
Hoshal, Steven G.
Evangelista, Lisa
Kuhn, Maggie
author_sort Harris, Brianna N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: How reconstruction affects function following total laryngectomy is unclear. This study seeks to determine whether reconstruction method is associated with differences in swallowing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of reconstruction technique in patients undergoing TL was compared by pharyngeal transit time (PTT), patient‐reported dysphagia (EAT‐10), and diet‐tolerated (FOIS). RESULTS: Ninety‐five patients met inclusion criteria, with 40 patients (42.1%) undergoing primary closure and 55 patients (57.9%) undergoing tissue transfer. There was no difference in EAT‐10 scores between the groups (P = .09). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving oral diet (FOIS >3) with primary closure (P = .003). Patients undergoing PMC vs free flap had similar rates of g‐tube dependency. Primary closure had the shortest PTT (1.89 seconds) compared to free flap (3.47‐4.65 seconds) or PMC (5.1 seconds; P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: When primary closure is achievable, these results suggest improved swallowing outcomes with better tolerance of oral diet and shorter pharyngeal transit times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7444795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74447952020-08-28 Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes Harris, Brianna N. Hoshal, Steven G. Evangelista, Lisa Kuhn, Maggie Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology, Speech and Language Science OBJECTIVES: How reconstruction affects function following total laryngectomy is unclear. This study seeks to determine whether reconstruction method is associated with differences in swallowing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of reconstruction technique in patients undergoing TL was compared by pharyngeal transit time (PTT), patient‐reported dysphagia (EAT‐10), and diet‐tolerated (FOIS). RESULTS: Ninety‐five patients met inclusion criteria, with 40 patients (42.1%) undergoing primary closure and 55 patients (57.9%) undergoing tissue transfer. There was no difference in EAT‐10 scores between the groups (P = .09). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving oral diet (FOIS >3) with primary closure (P = .003). Patients undergoing PMC vs free flap had similar rates of g‐tube dependency. Primary closure had the shortest PTT (1.89 seconds) compared to free flap (3.47‐4.65 seconds) or PMC (5.1 seconds; P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: When primary closure is achievable, these results suggest improved swallowing outcomes with better tolerance of oral diet and shorter pharyngeal transit times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7444795/ /pubmed/32864442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.430 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
Harris, Brianna N.
Hoshal, Steven G.
Evangelista, Lisa
Kuhn, Maggie
Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
title Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
title_full Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
title_fullStr Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
title_short Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
title_sort reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes
topic Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.430
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisbriannan reconstructiontechniquefollowingtotallaryngectomyaffectsswallowingoutcomes
AT hoshalsteveng reconstructiontechniquefollowingtotallaryngectomyaffectsswallowingoutcomes
AT evangelistalisa reconstructiontechniquefollowingtotallaryngectomyaffectsswallowingoutcomes
AT kuhnmaggie reconstructiontechniquefollowingtotallaryngectomyaffectsswallowingoutcomes