Cargando…

Systematic review of microvascular coupling devices for arterial anastomoses in free tissue transfer

BACKGROUND: Coupling devices have become commonplace in performing venous anastomoses during microvascular free tissue transfer (FTT). However, arterial anastomoses are still most commonly performed using traditional microvascular suture techniques. OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and feasibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gundale, Abhijit R., Berkovic, Yuro J., Entezami, Payam, Nathan, Cherie‐Ann O., Chang, Brent A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7444801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.427
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coupling devices have become commonplace in performing venous anastomoses during microvascular free tissue transfer (FTT). However, arterial anastomoses are still most commonly performed using traditional microvascular suture techniques. OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and feasibility of using microvascular coupling devices for free flap arterial anastomosis. METHODS: A systematic review of English language literature was performed for studies that investigated the use of an arterial coupler for microvascular FTT in human patients. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (January 1948 to August 2018), EMBASE (January 1974 to August 2018), and Web of Science was performed. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. All studies were retrospective case series. A combined total of 395 arterial anastomoses were attempted with a coupling device. All studies except for one used the 3M Unilink/Synovis coupling device. One study used a novel absorbable coupling device. The coupling device was aborted and converted to a suture technique in 8.4% of attempted anastomoses. Rupture of the anastomotic device was reported in only 1 patient (0.3%). Thrombosis was also infrequent at 1.9%. The quality assessment showed a high risk of bias in all studies. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, coupling devices for arterial anastomoses have a good success rate with low rates of thrombosis based on limited quality evidence.