Cargando…

Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer

Introduction The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based adjustments with respect to kV-orthogonal fiducial marker-based matching in a group of patients with prostate cancer.  Methods Twenty prostate cancer patients were eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eren, Mehmet F, Çolpan Öksüz, Didem, Sayan, Mutlay, Karaçam, Songül, Vergalasova, Irina, Ay Eren, Ayfer, Öner Dinçbaş, Fazilet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850264
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9916
_version_ 1783573902829551616
author Eren, Mehmet F
Çolpan Öksüz, Didem
Sayan, Mutlay
Karaçam, Songül
Vergalasova, Irina
Ay Eren, Ayfer
Öner Dinçbaş, Fazilet
author_facet Eren, Mehmet F
Çolpan Öksüz, Didem
Sayan, Mutlay
Karaçam, Songül
Vergalasova, Irina
Ay Eren, Ayfer
Öner Dinçbaş, Fazilet
author_sort Eren, Mehmet F
collection PubMed
description Introduction The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based adjustments with respect to kV-orthogonal fiducial marker-based matching in a group of patients with prostate cancer.  Methods Twenty prostate cancer patients were evaluated retrospectively: 10 with implanted fiducial markers and 10 without. Daily orthogonal kV imaging was recorded prior to radiation delivery. Images were evaluated in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions by matching either the implanted fiducials or going off bony anatomy, depending on the presence or absence of markers, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging was also subsequently acquired and images were aligned with the planning CT. The couch shifts were calculated and the patient’s position was adjusted accordingly. Standard deviations and random errors were also computed. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to evaluate relationships between the datasets. Results A total of 240 images were evaluated. The Pearson correlation coefficient for shifts applied to patients with markers using kV and CBCT was 88.3%, 87.8%, and 94.5% for the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. For those without markers, the respective values for the LR, AP, and SI directions were: 39.3%, 22.4%, and 3.7%. A Bland-Altman analysis comparing kV and CBCT in patients with markers, revealed R(2) values of 0.152, 0.282, and 0.097 in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. The R(2) values for patients without markers were 0.008, 0.01, and 0.057, in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. Conclusions Our data suggest that CBCT can be a viable option for image-guidance in clinical settings where fiducial markers are unavailable such as situations of inaccessibility or medical contraindications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7445001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74450012020-08-25 Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer Eren, Mehmet F Çolpan Öksüz, Didem Sayan, Mutlay Karaçam, Songül Vergalasova, Irina Ay Eren, Ayfer Öner Dinçbaş, Fazilet Cureus Radiation Oncology Introduction The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based adjustments with respect to kV-orthogonal fiducial marker-based matching in a group of patients with prostate cancer.  Methods Twenty prostate cancer patients were evaluated retrospectively: 10 with implanted fiducial markers and 10 without. Daily orthogonal kV imaging was recorded prior to radiation delivery. Images were evaluated in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions by matching either the implanted fiducials or going off bony anatomy, depending on the presence or absence of markers, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging was also subsequently acquired and images were aligned with the planning CT. The couch shifts were calculated and the patient’s position was adjusted accordingly. Standard deviations and random errors were also computed. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to evaluate relationships between the datasets. Results A total of 240 images were evaluated. The Pearson correlation coefficient for shifts applied to patients with markers using kV and CBCT was 88.3%, 87.8%, and 94.5% for the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. For those without markers, the respective values for the LR, AP, and SI directions were: 39.3%, 22.4%, and 3.7%. A Bland-Altman analysis comparing kV and CBCT in patients with markers, revealed R(2) values of 0.152, 0.282, and 0.097 in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. The R(2) values for patients without markers were 0.008, 0.01, and 0.057, in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. Conclusions Our data suggest that CBCT can be a viable option for image-guidance in clinical settings where fiducial markers are unavailable such as situations of inaccessibility or medical contraindications. Cureus 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7445001/ /pubmed/32850264 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9916 Text en Copyright © 2020, Eren et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Eren, Mehmet F
Çolpan Öksüz, Didem
Sayan, Mutlay
Karaçam, Songül
Vergalasova, Irina
Ay Eren, Ayfer
Öner Dinçbaş, Fazilet
Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer
title Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer
title_full Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer
title_short Comparison of kV Orthogonal Radiographs and kV-Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy Methods With and Without Implanted Fiducials in Prostate Cancer
title_sort comparison of kv orthogonal radiographs and kv-cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy methods with and without implanted fiducials in prostate cancer
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850264
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9916
work_keys_str_mv AT erenmehmetf comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer
AT colpanoksuzdidem comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer
AT sayanmutlay comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer
AT karacamsongul comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer
AT vergalasovairina comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer
AT ayerenayfer comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer
AT onerdincbasfazilet comparisonofkvorthogonalradiographsandkvconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidedradiotherapymethodswithandwithoutimplantedfiducialsinprostatecancer