Cargando…

Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views

BACKGROUND: Prevention of the impact of chemicals on human health and the environment is an increasing focus of public health polices and policy makers. The World Health Organization European Centre for Environment and Health wanted to know what were stakeholders’ priorities for improving chemicals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincenten, Joanne A, Zastenskaya, Irina, Schröder-Bäck, Peter, Jarosinska, Dorota Iwona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa074
_version_ 1783573908780220416
author Vincenten, Joanne A
Zastenskaya, Irina
Schröder-Bäck, Peter
Jarosinska, Dorota Iwona
author_facet Vincenten, Joanne A
Zastenskaya, Irina
Schröder-Bäck, Peter
Jarosinska, Dorota Iwona
author_sort Vincenten, Joanne A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prevention of the impact of chemicals on human health and the environment is an increasing focus of public health polices and policy makers. The World Health Organization European Centre for Environment and Health wanted to know what were stakeholders’ priorities for improving chemicals management and prevention. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 18 diverse stakeholders to answer this question. The interview questionnaire was developed using current WHO chemical meeting reports, the Evidence Implementation Model for Public Health Systems and categories of the theory of diffusion. Stakeholder views were attained on three main questions within the questionnaire. (i) What priority actions should be undertaken to minimize the negative impact of chemicals? (ii) Who needs to be more involved and what roles should they have? (iii) How can science and knowledge on chemicals and health be translated into policies more effectively and what are the greatest barriers to overcome? RESULTS: Cross cutting issues, such as legislation strengthening and enforcement, further collection of information, capacity building, education and awareness raising were considered priorities. The responders had the same vision on roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders. The greatest barrier to adoption, implementation and enforcement of evidence-based policies reported was leadership and political commitment to chemical safety. CONCLUSIONS: Priorities raised differed depending on knowledge, professional background and type of stakeholder. Factors influencing priority identification at the national level include international and global context, availability of information, knowledge of the current situation and evidence-based good practice, and risks and priorities identified through national assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7445031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74450312020-08-27 Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views Vincenten, Joanne A Zastenskaya, Irina Schröder-Bäck, Peter Jarosinska, Dorota Iwona Eur J Public Health Environment and Health BACKGROUND: Prevention of the impact of chemicals on human health and the environment is an increasing focus of public health polices and policy makers. The World Health Organization European Centre for Environment and Health wanted to know what were stakeholders’ priorities for improving chemicals management and prevention. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 18 diverse stakeholders to answer this question. The interview questionnaire was developed using current WHO chemical meeting reports, the Evidence Implementation Model for Public Health Systems and categories of the theory of diffusion. Stakeholder views were attained on three main questions within the questionnaire. (i) What priority actions should be undertaken to minimize the negative impact of chemicals? (ii) Who needs to be more involved and what roles should they have? (iii) How can science and knowledge on chemicals and health be translated into policies more effectively and what are the greatest barriers to overcome? RESULTS: Cross cutting issues, such as legislation strengthening and enforcement, further collection of information, capacity building, education and awareness raising were considered priorities. The responders had the same vision on roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders. The greatest barrier to adoption, implementation and enforcement of evidence-based policies reported was leadership and political commitment to chemical safety. CONCLUSIONS: Priorities raised differed depending on knowledge, professional background and type of stakeholder. Factors influencing priority identification at the national level include international and global context, availability of information, knowledge of the current situation and evidence-based good practice, and risks and priorities identified through national assessments. Oxford University Press 2020-08 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7445031/ /pubmed/32385509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa074 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Environment and Health
Vincenten, Joanne A
Zastenskaya, Irina
Schröder-Bäck, Peter
Jarosinska, Dorota Iwona
Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views
title Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views
title_full Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views
title_fullStr Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views
title_full_unstemmed Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views
title_short Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region—stakeholders’ views
title_sort priorities for improving chemicals management in the who european region—stakeholders’ views
topic Environment and Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa074
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentenjoannea prioritiesforimprovingchemicalsmanagementinthewhoeuropeanregionstakeholdersviews
AT zastenskayairina prioritiesforimprovingchemicalsmanagementinthewhoeuropeanregionstakeholdersviews
AT schroderbackpeter prioritiesforimprovingchemicalsmanagementinthewhoeuropeanregionstakeholdersviews
AT jarosinskadorotaiwona prioritiesforimprovingchemicalsmanagementinthewhoeuropeanregionstakeholdersviews