Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of azithromycin in patients with COVID-19: An open-label randomised trial

As no specific pharmacological treatment has been validated for use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we aimed to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) in these patients at a referral centre in Iran. An open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted on patients with laboratory-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekhavati, Ehsan, Jafari, Fatemeh, SeyedAlinaghi, SeyedAhmad, Jamalimoghadamsiahkali, Saeidreza, Sadr, Sara, Tabarestani, Mohammad, Pirhayati, Mohammad, Zendehdel, Abolfazl, Manafi, Navid, Hajiabdolbaghi, Mahboubeh, Ahmadinejad, Zahra, Kouchak, Hamid Emadi, Jafari, Sirous, Khalili, Hosein, Salehi, Mohamadreza, Seifi, Arash, Golestan, Fereshteh Shahmari, Ghiasvand, Fereshteh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32853672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106143
Descripción
Sumario:As no specific pharmacological treatment has been validated for use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we aimed to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin (AZM) in these patients at a referral centre in Iran. An open-label, randomised controlled trial was conducted on patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. A total of 55 patients in the control group receiving hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) were compared with 56 patients in the case group who in addition to the same regimen also received AZM. Patients with prior cardiac disease were excluded from the study. Furthermore, patients from the case group were assessed for cardiac arrythmia risk based on the American College of Cardiology (ACC) risk assessment for use of AZM and HCQ. The main outcome measures were vital signs, SpO(2) levels, duration of hospitalisation, need for and length of intensive care unit admission, mortality rate and results of 30-day follow-up after discharge. Initially, there was no significant difference between the general conditions and vital signs of the two groups. The SpO(2) levels at discharge were significantly higher, the respiratory rate was lower and the duration of admission was shorter in the case group. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups. Patients who received AZM in addition to HCQ and LPV/r had a better general condition. HCQ+AZM combination may be beneficial for individuals who are known to have a very low underlying risk for cardiac arrhythmia based on the ACC criteria.