Cargando…
Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
The aim of our study was to evaluate the classical therapies represented by adequate glycemic control and lifestyle changes versus classical therapies combined with new antioxidant therapies in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We conducted an observational, prospective study, between October 2017...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical University Publishing House Craiova
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874683 http://dx.doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.46.02.04 |
_version_ | 1783574027202199552 |
---|---|
author | ROTARU, ANDREEA TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA IANCĂU, MARIA |
author_facet | ROTARU, ANDREEA TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA IANCĂU, MARIA |
author_sort | ROTARU, ANDREEA |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of our study was to evaluate the classical therapies represented by adequate glycemic control and lifestyle changes versus classical therapies combined with new antioxidant therapies in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We conducted an observational, prospective study, between October 2017 and December 2019, which included a number of 188 patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy. In order to evaluate the response to the therapeutic protocol, we used the MNSI (Michigan neuropathy screening instrument). Responder group was defined as a decrease in MNSI (<7) from baseline to one year. According to this 34.04% (n=64) of patients were responders to classical therapy while a higher number of patients responded to combined therapy (n=73, representing 38.83%). In the group of responders, the subgroups that predicted the prevention of MNSI increase (decrease in the impact of diabetic neuropathy) in the group treated with combined therapy compared to classical therapy, related to clinicopathological features, after one year included: gender female (p=0.0415), body mass index <30kg/m2 (p=0.0335), absence of cardiovascular disease (p=0.0006) and absence of dyslipidemia (p=0.0288). In conclusion, we demonstrated an increased response to combined therapy after one year of treatment. Thus, combined therapy is an alternative for reducing side effects and for increasing efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7445650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Medical University Publishing House Craiova |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74456502020-08-31 Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy ROTARU, ANDREEA TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA IANCĂU, MARIA Curr Health Sci J Original Paper The aim of our study was to evaluate the classical therapies represented by adequate glycemic control and lifestyle changes versus classical therapies combined with new antioxidant therapies in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We conducted an observational, prospective study, between October 2017 and December 2019, which included a number of 188 patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy. In order to evaluate the response to the therapeutic protocol, we used the MNSI (Michigan neuropathy screening instrument). Responder group was defined as a decrease in MNSI (<7) from baseline to one year. According to this 34.04% (n=64) of patients were responders to classical therapy while a higher number of patients responded to combined therapy (n=73, representing 38.83%). In the group of responders, the subgroups that predicted the prevention of MNSI increase (decrease in the impact of diabetic neuropathy) in the group treated with combined therapy compared to classical therapy, related to clinicopathological features, after one year included: gender female (p=0.0415), body mass index <30kg/m2 (p=0.0335), absence of cardiovascular disease (p=0.0006) and absence of dyslipidemia (p=0.0288). In conclusion, we demonstrated an increased response to combined therapy after one year of treatment. Thus, combined therapy is an alternative for reducing side effects and for increasing efficiency. Medical University Publishing House Craiova 2020 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7445650/ /pubmed/32874683 http://dx.doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.46.02.04 Text en Copyright © 2014, Medical University Publishing House Craiova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License, which permits unrestricted use, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium, non-commercially, provided the new creations are licensed under identical terms as the original work and the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper ROTARU, ANDREEA TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA IANCĂU, MARIA Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy |
title | Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy |
title_full | Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy |
title_fullStr | Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy |
title_short | Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy |
title_sort | classical therapies versus combined therapies in diabetic neuropathy |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874683 http://dx.doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.46.02.04 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rotaruandreea classicaltherapiesversuscombinedtherapiesindiabeticneuropathy AT tarteaelenaanca classicaltherapiesversuscombinedtherapiesindiabeticneuropathy AT iancaumaria classicaltherapiesversuscombinedtherapiesindiabeticneuropathy |