Cargando…

Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy

The aim of our study was to evaluate the classical therapies represented by adequate glycemic control and lifestyle changes versus classical therapies combined with new antioxidant therapies in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We conducted an observational, prospective study, between October 2017...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ROTARU, ANDREEA, TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA, IANCĂU, MARIA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical University Publishing House Craiova 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874683
http://dx.doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.46.02.04
_version_ 1783574027202199552
author ROTARU, ANDREEA
TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA
IANCĂU, MARIA
author_facet ROTARU, ANDREEA
TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA
IANCĂU, MARIA
author_sort ROTARU, ANDREEA
collection PubMed
description The aim of our study was to evaluate the classical therapies represented by adequate glycemic control and lifestyle changes versus classical therapies combined with new antioxidant therapies in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We conducted an observational, prospective study, between October 2017 and December 2019, which included a number of 188 patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy. In order to evaluate the response to the therapeutic protocol, we used the MNSI (Michigan neuropathy screening instrument). Responder group was defined as a decrease in MNSI (<7) from baseline to one year. According to this 34.04% (n=64) of patients were responders to classical therapy while a higher number of patients responded to combined therapy (n=73, representing 38.83%). In the group of responders, the subgroups that predicted the prevention of MNSI increase (decrease in the impact of diabetic neuropathy) in the group treated with combined therapy compared to classical therapy, related to clinicopathological features, after one year included: gender female (p=0.0415), body mass index <30kg/m2 (p=0.0335), absence of cardiovascular disease (p=0.0006) and absence of dyslipidemia (p=0.0288). In conclusion, we demonstrated an increased response to combined therapy after one year of treatment. Thus, combined therapy is an alternative for reducing side effects and for increasing efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7445650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medical University Publishing House Craiova
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74456502020-08-31 Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy ROTARU, ANDREEA TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA IANCĂU, MARIA Curr Health Sci J Original Paper The aim of our study was to evaluate the classical therapies represented by adequate glycemic control and lifestyle changes versus classical therapies combined with new antioxidant therapies in patients with diabetic neuropathy. We conducted an observational, prospective study, between October 2017 and December 2019, which included a number of 188 patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy. In order to evaluate the response to the therapeutic protocol, we used the MNSI (Michigan neuropathy screening instrument). Responder group was defined as a decrease in MNSI (<7) from baseline to one year. According to this 34.04% (n=64) of patients were responders to classical therapy while a higher number of patients responded to combined therapy (n=73, representing 38.83%). In the group of responders, the subgroups that predicted the prevention of MNSI increase (decrease in the impact of diabetic neuropathy) in the group treated with combined therapy compared to classical therapy, related to clinicopathological features, after one year included: gender female (p=0.0415), body mass index <30kg/m2 (p=0.0335), absence of cardiovascular disease (p=0.0006) and absence of dyslipidemia (p=0.0288). In conclusion, we demonstrated an increased response to combined therapy after one year of treatment. Thus, combined therapy is an alternative for reducing side effects and for increasing efficiency. Medical University Publishing House Craiova 2020 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7445650/ /pubmed/32874683 http://dx.doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.46.02.04 Text en Copyright © 2014, Medical University Publishing House Craiova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License, which permits unrestricted use, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium, non-commercially, provided the new creations are licensed under identical terms as the original work and the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
ROTARU, ANDREEA
TÂRTEA, ELENA ANCA
IANCĂU, MARIA
Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
title Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
title_full Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
title_fullStr Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
title_full_unstemmed Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
title_short Classical Therapies Versus Combined Therapies in Diabetic Neuropathy
title_sort classical therapies versus combined therapies in diabetic neuropathy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874683
http://dx.doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.46.02.04
work_keys_str_mv AT rotaruandreea classicaltherapiesversuscombinedtherapiesindiabeticneuropathy
AT tarteaelenaanca classicaltherapiesversuscombinedtherapiesindiabeticneuropathy
AT iancaumaria classicaltherapiesversuscombinedtherapiesindiabeticneuropathy