Cargando…
A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography
OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin responsible for calcium metabolism and more recently discovered effects. This led to an increase in requests for vitamin D test by clinicians. New automated assays have been introduced for 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement. METHODS: Results from these new...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334467 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.4.1039 |
_version_ | 1783574091842715648 |
---|---|
author | Reda, Hala Soliman, Sonya Girguis, Hany Nagy, Mohamed Mahmoud, Yousra Yasser, Nouran |
author_facet | Reda, Hala Soliman, Sonya Girguis, Hany Nagy, Mohamed Mahmoud, Yousra Yasser, Nouran |
author_sort | Reda, Hala |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin responsible for calcium metabolism and more recently discovered effects. This led to an increase in requests for vitamin D test by clinicians. New automated assays have been introduced for 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement. METHODS: Results from these new method have to be related to a Standard method to obtain best results for practical usage. In our study, one hundred venous blood samples were analyzed for 25-OH vitamin D on three immunological methods in our lab and correlated with ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method as a reference method. RESULTS: Statistically analysis of results obtained for correlations between the 3 methods against the reference UPLC was done by Spearman’s Correlation. It showed positive correlation in all methods with significant p value < 0.001. Differences and biases between methods were evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot and Cohen’s Kappa agreement. Best agreement was found in Cobas 6000 followed by the Access2 then comes Architect. CONCLUSIONS: All immunoassays can be used in routine 25(OH) D measurements, still some methods are better than others. A clinical laboratory must at least be aware of its method to avoid misinterpretation of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7445983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74459832020-09-02 A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Reda, Hala Soliman, Sonya Girguis, Hany Nagy, Mohamed Mahmoud, Yousra Yasser, Nouran Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin responsible for calcium metabolism and more recently discovered effects. This led to an increase in requests for vitamin D test by clinicians. New automated assays have been introduced for 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement. METHODS: Results from these new method have to be related to a Standard method to obtain best results for practical usage. In our study, one hundred venous blood samples were analyzed for 25-OH vitamin D on three immunological methods in our lab and correlated with ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method as a reference method. RESULTS: Statistically analysis of results obtained for correlations between the 3 methods against the reference UPLC was done by Spearman’s Correlation. It showed positive correlation in all methods with significant p value < 0.001. Differences and biases between methods were evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot and Cohen’s Kappa agreement. Best agreement was found in Cobas 6000 followed by the Access2 then comes Architect. CONCLUSIONS: All immunoassays can be used in routine 25(OH) D measurements, still some methods are better than others. A clinical laboratory must at least be aware of its method to avoid misinterpretation of results. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7445983/ /pubmed/32334467 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.4.1039 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reda, Hala Soliman, Sonya Girguis, Hany Nagy, Mohamed Mahmoud, Yousra Yasser, Nouran A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography |
title | A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography |
title_full | A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography |
title_fullStr | A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography |
title_short | A Comparison between Three Different Automated Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D Immunoassay Methods and Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography |
title_sort | comparison between three different automated total 25-hydroxyvitamin d immunoassay methods and ultra performance liquid chromatography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7445983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334467 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.4.1039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT redahala acomparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT solimansonya acomparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT girguishany acomparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT nagymohamed acomparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT mahmoudyousra acomparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT yassernouran acomparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT redahala comparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT solimansonya comparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT girguishany comparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT nagymohamed comparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT mahmoudyousra comparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography AT yassernouran comparisonbetweenthreedifferentautomatedtotal25hydroxyvitamindimmunoassaymethodsandultraperformanceliquidchromatography |