Cargando…

Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal

BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, chola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujita, Akashi, Nakahara, Kazunari, Michikawa, Yosuke, Morita, Ryo, Suetani, Keigo, Sato, Junya, Igarashi, Yosuke, Araki, Ryuichiro, Ikeda, Hiroki, Matsunaga, Kotaro, Watanabe, Tsunamasa, Itoh, Fumio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01428-3
_version_ 1783574123825332224
author Fujita, Akashi
Nakahara, Kazunari
Michikawa, Yosuke
Morita, Ryo
Suetani, Keigo
Sato, Junya
Igarashi, Yosuke
Araki, Ryuichiro
Ikeda, Hiroki
Matsunaga, Kotaro
Watanabe, Tsunamasa
Itoh, Fumio
author_facet Fujita, Akashi
Nakahara, Kazunari
Michikawa, Yosuke
Morita, Ryo
Suetani, Keigo
Sato, Junya
Igarashi, Yosuke
Araki, Ryuichiro
Ikeda, Hiroki
Matsunaga, Kotaro
Watanabe, Tsunamasa
Itoh, Fumio
author_sort Fujita, Akashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, cholangitis, and pancreatitis and considerably increase cost given the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures. To date, risk factors for residual bile duct stones following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) extraction have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively investigated the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones following extraction via ERCP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP cases that underwent endoscopic bile duct stone extraction between April 2014 and March 2019. A total of 505 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after ERCP. RESULTS: The rate of residual stones was 4.8% (24/505). Residual stones were detected by computed tomography (12/24) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (12/24). In univariate analyses, a large number of stones (P = 0.01), long procedure time (P = 0.005), and performance of the pancreatic duct guidewire placement method (P-GW) for selective bile duct cannulation (P = 0.01) were the factors involved in residual stones. In multiple logistic regression analysis, performing P-GW was retained as the only independent factor of residual stones (adjusted odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.19–9.88; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: When removing bile duct stones with a pancreatic guidewire in place, paying attention to residual stones is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74462132020-08-26 Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal Fujita, Akashi Nakahara, Kazunari Michikawa, Yosuke Morita, Ryo Suetani, Keigo Sato, Junya Igarashi, Yosuke Araki, Ryuichiro Ikeda, Hiroki Matsunaga, Kotaro Watanabe, Tsunamasa Itoh, Fumio BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, cholangitis, and pancreatitis and considerably increase cost given the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures. To date, risk factors for residual bile duct stones following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) extraction have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively investigated the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones following extraction via ERCP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP cases that underwent endoscopic bile duct stone extraction between April 2014 and March 2019. A total of 505 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after ERCP. RESULTS: The rate of residual stones was 4.8% (24/505). Residual stones were detected by computed tomography (12/24) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (12/24). In univariate analyses, a large number of stones (P = 0.01), long procedure time (P = 0.005), and performance of the pancreatic duct guidewire placement method (P-GW) for selective bile duct cannulation (P = 0.01) were the factors involved in residual stones. In multiple logistic regression analysis, performing P-GW was retained as the only independent factor of residual stones (adjusted odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.19–9.88; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: When removing bile duct stones with a pancreatic guidewire in place, paying attention to residual stones is necessary. BioMed Central 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7446213/ /pubmed/32831030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01428-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fujita, Akashi
Nakahara, Kazunari
Michikawa, Yosuke
Morita, Ryo
Suetani, Keigo
Sato, Junya
Igarashi, Yosuke
Araki, Ryuichiro
Ikeda, Hiroki
Matsunaga, Kotaro
Watanabe, Tsunamasa
Itoh, Fumio
Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
title Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
title_full Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
title_fullStr Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
title_full_unstemmed Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
title_short Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
title_sort pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01428-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fujitaakashi pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT nakaharakazunari pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT michikawayosuke pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT moritaryo pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT suetanikeigo pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT satojunya pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT igarashiyosuke pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT arakiryuichiro pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT ikedahiroki pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT matsunagakotaro pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT watanabetsunamasa pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval
AT itohfumio pancreaticductguidewireplacementforbiliarycannulationasariskfactorforstoneresidueafterendoscopictranspapillarystoneremoval