Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk

PURPOSE: Women with a family history of breast cancer are frequently referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing, yet < 10% are found to have pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Large-scale genotyping studies have identified common variants (primarily single-nucleo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Elisha, Tshiaba, Placede, Gallagher, Shannon, Wagner, Susanne, Judkins, Thaddeus, Roa, Benjamin, Rosenthal, Eric, Domchek, Susan, Garber, Judy, Lancaster, Johnathan, Weitzel, Jeffrey, Kurian, Allison W., Lanchbury, Jerry S., Gutin, Alexander, Robson, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00360
_version_ 1783574142627348480
author Hughes, Elisha
Tshiaba, Placede
Gallagher, Shannon
Wagner, Susanne
Judkins, Thaddeus
Roa, Benjamin
Rosenthal, Eric
Domchek, Susan
Garber, Judy
Lancaster, Johnathan
Weitzel, Jeffrey
Kurian, Allison W.
Lanchbury, Jerry S.
Gutin, Alexander
Robson, Mark
author_facet Hughes, Elisha
Tshiaba, Placede
Gallagher, Shannon
Wagner, Susanne
Judkins, Thaddeus
Roa, Benjamin
Rosenthal, Eric
Domchek, Susan
Garber, Judy
Lancaster, Johnathan
Weitzel, Jeffrey
Kurian, Allison W.
Lanchbury, Jerry S.
Gutin, Alexander
Robson, Mark
author_sort Hughes, Elisha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Women with a family history of breast cancer are frequently referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing, yet < 10% are found to have pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Large-scale genotyping studies have identified common variants (primarily single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) with individually modest breast cancer risk that, in aggregate, account for considerable breast cancer susceptibility. Here, we describe the development and empirical validation of an SNP-based polygenic breast cancer risk score. METHODS: A panel of 94 SNPs was examined for association with breast cancer in women of European ancestry undergoing hereditary cancer genetic testing and negative for pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes. Candidate polygenic risk scores (PRSs) as predictors of personal breast cancer history were developed through multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, cancer history, and ancestry. An optimized PRS was validated in 2 independent cohorts (n = 13,174; n = 141,160). RESULTS: Within the training cohort (n = 24,259), 4,291 women (18%) had a personal history of breast cancer and 8,725 women (36%) reported breast cancer in a first-degree relative. The optimized PRS included 86 variants and was highly predictive of breast cancer status in both validation cohorts (P = 6.4 × 10(−66); P < 10(−325)). The odds ratio (OR) per unit standard deviation was consistent between validations (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.52]; OR 1.47 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1.49]). In a direct comparison, the 86-SNP PRS outperformed a previously described PRS of 77 SNPs. CONCLUSION: The validation and implementation of a PRS for women without pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes offers potential for risk stratification to guide surveillance recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74463632020-09-30 Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk Hughes, Elisha Tshiaba, Placede Gallagher, Shannon Wagner, Susanne Judkins, Thaddeus Roa, Benjamin Rosenthal, Eric Domchek, Susan Garber, Judy Lancaster, Johnathan Weitzel, Jeffrey Kurian, Allison W. Lanchbury, Jerry S. Gutin, Alexander Robson, Mark JCO Precis Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: Women with a family history of breast cancer are frequently referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing, yet < 10% are found to have pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Large-scale genotyping studies have identified common variants (primarily single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) with individually modest breast cancer risk that, in aggregate, account for considerable breast cancer susceptibility. Here, we describe the development and empirical validation of an SNP-based polygenic breast cancer risk score. METHODS: A panel of 94 SNPs was examined for association with breast cancer in women of European ancestry undergoing hereditary cancer genetic testing and negative for pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes. Candidate polygenic risk scores (PRSs) as predictors of personal breast cancer history were developed through multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, cancer history, and ancestry. An optimized PRS was validated in 2 independent cohorts (n = 13,174; n = 141,160). RESULTS: Within the training cohort (n = 24,259), 4,291 women (18%) had a personal history of breast cancer and 8,725 women (36%) reported breast cancer in a first-degree relative. The optimized PRS included 86 variants and was highly predictive of breast cancer status in both validation cohorts (P = 6.4 × 10(−66); P < 10(−325)). The odds ratio (OR) per unit standard deviation was consistent between validations (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.52]; OR 1.47 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1.49]). In a direct comparison, the 86-SNP PRS outperformed a previously described PRS of 77 SNPs. CONCLUSION: The validation and implementation of a PRS for women without pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes offers potential for risk stratification to guide surveillance recommendations. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7446363/ /pubmed/32923876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00360 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Reports
Hughes, Elisha
Tshiaba, Placede
Gallagher, Shannon
Wagner, Susanne
Judkins, Thaddeus
Roa, Benjamin
Rosenthal, Eric
Domchek, Susan
Garber, Judy
Lancaster, Johnathan
Weitzel, Jeffrey
Kurian, Allison W.
Lanchbury, Jerry S.
Gutin, Alexander
Robson, Mark
Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
title Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
title_full Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
title_short Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
title_sort development and validation of a clinical polygenic risk score to predict breast cancer risk
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32923876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00360
work_keys_str_mv AT hugheselisha developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT tshiabaplacede developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT gallaghershannon developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT wagnersusanne developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT judkinsthaddeus developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT roabenjamin developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT rosenthaleric developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT domcheksusan developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT garberjudy developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT lancasterjohnathan developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT weitzeljeffrey developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT kurianallisonw developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT lanchburyjerrys developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT gutinalexander developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk
AT robsonmark developmentandvalidationofaclinicalpolygenicriskscoretopredictbreastcancerrisk