Cargando…

Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study

PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) detects several classes of genomic alterations across numerous genes simultaneously and can match more patients with genomically targeted therapies than conventional molecular profiling. The current study estimated the costs of anticancer drugs and over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chawla, Anita, Janku, Filip, Wheler, Jennifer J., Miller, Vincent A., Ryan, Jason, Anhorn, Rachel, Zhou, Zhou, Signorovitch, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00074
_version_ 1783574149723062272
author Chawla, Anita
Janku, Filip
Wheler, Jennifer J.
Miller, Vincent A.
Ryan, Jason
Anhorn, Rachel
Zhou, Zhou
Signorovitch, James
author_facet Chawla, Anita
Janku, Filip
Wheler, Jennifer J.
Miller, Vincent A.
Ryan, Jason
Anhorn, Rachel
Zhou, Zhou
Signorovitch, James
author_sort Chawla, Anita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) detects several classes of genomic alterations across numerous genes simultaneously and can match more patients with genomically targeted therapies than conventional molecular profiling. The current study estimated the costs of anticancer drugs and overall survival (OS) for patients who were treated with matched and unmatched therapy. METHODS: Costs were estimated for patients with complete data (188 of 500 patients) from a prospective, nonrandomized study of patients with diverse refractory cancers who underwent CGP and were treated with matched or unmatched therapy. We assessed mean time to treatment failure (TTF) and mean observed OS. Patient-specific drug and administration costs were imputed for the first regimen after CGP on the basis of drug classes, unit costs, and time on treatment. RESULTS: Patients on matched (n = 122) versus unmatched (n = 66) therapy had longer mean TTF (+1.5 months) and observed OS (+2.4 months) and higher drug costs (+$38,065; all P < .01). Increased drug costs were largely attributable to the longer duration of therapy associated with extended TTF (66.3%) rather than higher monthly drug costs (33.7%). Incremental increases in TTF (+1.9 months v +1.2 months) and observed OS (+2.5 months v +2.1 months) between matched and unmatched therapies were larger for those who underwent CGP in earlier- versus later-line therapy. Incremental increases in drug costs between matched and unmatched therapies were lower for earlier- compared with later-line therapy (+$27,000 v +$43,000, respectively). CONCLUSION: Matched therapy was associated with longer TTF, increased OS, and manageable incremental cost increases compared with unmatched therapy. Most of these increased costs were a result of the longer duration of therapy rather than higher monthly drug costs. The benefits of matching were numerically greater in earlier versus later lines of therapy, which is consistent with the value of early use of CGP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74464842020-09-09 Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study Chawla, Anita Janku, Filip Wheler, Jennifer J. Miller, Vincent A. Ryan, Jason Anhorn, Rachel Zhou, Zhou Signorovitch, James JCO Precis Oncol Original Report PURPOSE: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) detects several classes of genomic alterations across numerous genes simultaneously and can match more patients with genomically targeted therapies than conventional molecular profiling. The current study estimated the costs of anticancer drugs and overall survival (OS) for patients who were treated with matched and unmatched therapy. METHODS: Costs were estimated for patients with complete data (188 of 500 patients) from a prospective, nonrandomized study of patients with diverse refractory cancers who underwent CGP and were treated with matched or unmatched therapy. We assessed mean time to treatment failure (TTF) and mean observed OS. Patient-specific drug and administration costs were imputed for the first regimen after CGP on the basis of drug classes, unit costs, and time on treatment. RESULTS: Patients on matched (n = 122) versus unmatched (n = 66) therapy had longer mean TTF (+1.5 months) and observed OS (+2.4 months) and higher drug costs (+$38,065; all P < .01). Increased drug costs were largely attributable to the longer duration of therapy associated with extended TTF (66.3%) rather than higher monthly drug costs (33.7%). Incremental increases in TTF (+1.9 months v +1.2 months) and observed OS (+2.5 months v +2.1 months) between matched and unmatched therapies were larger for those who underwent CGP in earlier- versus later-line therapy. Incremental increases in drug costs between matched and unmatched therapies were lower for earlier- compared with later-line therapy (+$27,000 v +$43,000, respectively). CONCLUSION: Matched therapy was associated with longer TTF, increased OS, and manageable incremental cost increases compared with unmatched therapy. Most of these increased costs were a result of the longer duration of therapy rather than higher monthly drug costs. The benefits of matching were numerically greater in earlier versus later lines of therapy, which is consistent with the value of early use of CGP. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7446484/ /pubmed/32913996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00074 Text en © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Report
Chawla, Anita
Janku, Filip
Wheler, Jennifer J.
Miller, Vincent A.
Ryan, Jason
Anhorn, Rachel
Zhou, Zhou
Signorovitch, James
Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study
title Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study
title_full Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study
title_fullStr Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study
title_short Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study
title_sort estimated cost of anticancer therapy directed by comprehensive genomic profiling in a single-center study
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00074
work_keys_str_mv AT chawlaanita estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT jankufilip estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT whelerjenniferj estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT millervincenta estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT ryanjason estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT anhornrachel estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT zhouzhou estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy
AT signorovitchjames estimatedcostofanticancertherapydirectedbycomprehensivegenomicprofilinginasinglecenterstudy