Cargando…

Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prone positioning improves mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS. Strategies to increase prone positioning under crisis conditions are needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Short, Briana, Parekh, Madhavi, Ryan, Patrick, Chiu, Maggie, Fine, Cynthia, Scala, Peter, Moses, Shirah, Jackson, Emily, Brodie, Daniel, Yip, Natalie H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32916611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.020
_version_ 1783574176970309632
author Short, Briana
Parekh, Madhavi
Ryan, Patrick
Chiu, Maggie
Fine, Cynthia
Scala, Peter
Moses, Shirah
Jackson, Emily
Brodie, Daniel
Yip, Natalie H.
author_facet Short, Briana
Parekh, Madhavi
Ryan, Patrick
Chiu, Maggie
Fine, Cynthia
Scala, Peter
Moses, Shirah
Jackson, Emily
Brodie, Daniel
Yip, Natalie H.
author_sort Short, Briana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prone positioning improves mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS. Strategies to increase prone positioning under crisis conditions are needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe the development of a mobile prone team during the height of the crisis in New York City and describe characteristics and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients who received prone positioning between April 2, 2020 and April 30, 2020. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent prone positioning for moderate-to-severe ARDS. Sixty-six patients (73.3%) were men, with a median age of 64 years (IQR 53–71), and the median PaO(2):FiO(2) ratio was 107 (IQR 85–140) prior to prone positioning. Patients required an average of 3 ± 2.2 prone sessions and the median time of each prone session was 19 h (IQR 17.5–20.75). By the end of the study period, proning was discontinued in sixty-seven (65.1%) cases due to clinical improvement, twenty (19.4%) cases due to lack of clinical improvement, six (5.8%) cases for clinical worsening, and ten (9.7%) cases due to a contraindication. CONCLUSION: The rapid development of a mobile prone team safely provided prone positioning to a large number of COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74467222020-08-26 Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic Short, Briana Parekh, Madhavi Ryan, Patrick Chiu, Maggie Fine, Cynthia Scala, Peter Moses, Shirah Jackson, Emily Brodie, Daniel Yip, Natalie H. J Crit Care Article PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prone positioning improves mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS. Strategies to increase prone positioning under crisis conditions are needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe the development of a mobile prone team during the height of the crisis in New York City and describe characteristics and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients who received prone positioning between April 2, 2020 and April 30, 2020. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent prone positioning for moderate-to-severe ARDS. Sixty-six patients (73.3%) were men, with a median age of 64 years (IQR 53–71), and the median PaO(2):FiO(2) ratio was 107 (IQR 85–140) prior to prone positioning. Patients required an average of 3 ± 2.2 prone sessions and the median time of each prone session was 19 h (IQR 17.5–20.75). By the end of the study period, proning was discontinued in sixty-seven (65.1%) cases due to clinical improvement, twenty (19.4%) cases due to lack of clinical improvement, six (5.8%) cases for clinical worsening, and ten (9.7%) cases due to a contraindication. CONCLUSION: The rapid development of a mobile prone team safely provided prone positioning to a large number of COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. Elsevier Inc. 2020-12 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7446722/ /pubmed/32916611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.020 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Short, Briana
Parekh, Madhavi
Ryan, Patrick
Chiu, Maggie
Fine, Cynthia
Scala, Peter
Moses, Shirah
Jackson, Emily
Brodie, Daniel
Yip, Natalie H.
Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort rapid implementation of a mobile prone team during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32916611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.020
work_keys_str_mv AT shortbriana rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT parekhmadhavi rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ryanpatrick rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT chiumaggie rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT finecynthia rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT scalapeter rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mosesshirah rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT jacksonemily rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT brodiedaniel rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic
AT yipnatalieh rapidimplementationofamobileproneteamduringthecovid19pandemic