Cargando…
Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237785 |
_version_ | 1783574183932854272 |
---|---|
author | Faatz, Henrik Rothaus, Kai Gunnemann, Marie-Louise Book, Marius Wilming, Pia Gutfleisch, Matthias Spital, Georg Lommatzsch, Albrecht Pauleikhoff, Daniel |
author_facet | Faatz, Henrik Rothaus, Kai Gunnemann, Marie-Louise Book, Marius Wilming, Pia Gutfleisch, Matthias Spital, Georg Lommatzsch, Albrecht Pauleikhoff, Daniel |
author_sort | Faatz, Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitative analysed, measuring area, flow, the fractal dimension, average vessel length, vascular density, and average vessel caliber. These parameters were compared between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. RESULTS: A strong linear association was found between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. While area, flow, and FD of the MNV were very similar, the 3×3mm images showed significantly lower average total vessel length, greater vascular density, and lower average vessel caliber. CONCLUSION: In quantitative analysis of the morphologic parameters of MNV in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, the structures are not directly equivalent in the two sizes of scan. The images must be evaluated on an individual basis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7446777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74467772020-08-26 Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images Faatz, Henrik Rothaus, Kai Gunnemann, Marie-Louise Book, Marius Wilming, Pia Gutfleisch, Matthias Spital, Georg Lommatzsch, Albrecht Pauleikhoff, Daniel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitative analysed, measuring area, flow, the fractal dimension, average vessel length, vascular density, and average vessel caliber. These parameters were compared between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. RESULTS: A strong linear association was found between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. While area, flow, and FD of the MNV were very similar, the 3×3mm images showed significantly lower average total vessel length, greater vascular density, and lower average vessel caliber. CONCLUSION: In quantitative analysis of the morphologic parameters of MNV in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, the structures are not directly equivalent in the two sizes of scan. The images must be evaluated on an individual basis. Public Library of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7446777/ /pubmed/32822371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237785 Text en © 2020 Faatz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Faatz, Henrik Rothaus, Kai Gunnemann, Marie-Louise Book, Marius Wilming, Pia Gutfleisch, Matthias Spital, Georg Lommatzsch, Albrecht Pauleikhoff, Daniel Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
title | Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
title_full | Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
title_fullStr | Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
title_short | Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
title_sort | morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by oct angiography—technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faatzhenrik morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT rothauskai morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT gunnemannmarielouise morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT bookmarius morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT wilmingpia morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT gutfleischmatthias morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT spitalgeorg morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT lommatzschalbrecht morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages AT pauleikhoffdaniel morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages |