Cargando…

Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faatz, Henrik, Rothaus, Kai, Gunnemann, Marie-Louise, Book, Marius, Wilming, Pia, Gutfleisch, Matthias, Spital, Georg, Lommatzsch, Albrecht, Pauleikhoff, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237785
_version_ 1783574183932854272
author Faatz, Henrik
Rothaus, Kai
Gunnemann, Marie-Louise
Book, Marius
Wilming, Pia
Gutfleisch, Matthias
Spital, Georg
Lommatzsch, Albrecht
Pauleikhoff, Daniel
author_facet Faatz, Henrik
Rothaus, Kai
Gunnemann, Marie-Louise
Book, Marius
Wilming, Pia
Gutfleisch, Matthias
Spital, Georg
Lommatzsch, Albrecht
Pauleikhoff, Daniel
author_sort Faatz, Henrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitative analysed, measuring area, flow, the fractal dimension, average vessel length, vascular density, and average vessel caliber. These parameters were compared between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. RESULTS: A strong linear association was found between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. While area, flow, and FD of the MNV were very similar, the 3×3mm images showed significantly lower average total vessel length, greater vascular density, and lower average vessel caliber. CONCLUSION: In quantitative analysis of the morphologic parameters of MNV in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, the structures are not directly equivalent in the two sizes of scan. The images must be evaluated on an individual basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74467772020-08-26 Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images Faatz, Henrik Rothaus, Kai Gunnemann, Marie-Louise Book, Marius Wilming, Pia Gutfleisch, Matthias Spital, Georg Lommatzsch, Albrecht Pauleikhoff, Daniel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether there are relevant differences between the vascular morphology of macular neovascularizations (MNV) in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, produced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: MNV of 49 patients were automated quantitative analysed, measuring area, flow, the fractal dimension, average vessel length, vascular density, and average vessel caliber. These parameters were compared between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. RESULTS: A strong linear association was found between the 3×3mm and the 6×6mm images. While area, flow, and FD of the MNV were very similar, the 3×3mm images showed significantly lower average total vessel length, greater vascular density, and lower average vessel caliber. CONCLUSION: In quantitative analysis of the morphologic parameters of MNV in 3×3mm and 6×6mm images, the structures are not directly equivalent in the two sizes of scan. The images must be evaluated on an individual basis. Public Library of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7446777/ /pubmed/32822371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237785 Text en © 2020 Faatz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Faatz, Henrik
Rothaus, Kai
Gunnemann, Marie-Louise
Book, Marius
Wilming, Pia
Gutfleisch, Matthias
Spital, Georg
Lommatzsch, Albrecht
Pauleikhoff, Daniel
Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
title Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
title_full Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
title_fullStr Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
title_full_unstemmed Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
title_short Morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by OCT angiography—Technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
title_sort morphologic analysis of macular neovascularizations by oct angiography—technical limitations in the comparison of 3×3mm and 6×6mm images
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237785
work_keys_str_mv AT faatzhenrik morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT rothauskai morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT gunnemannmarielouise morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT bookmarius morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT wilmingpia morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT gutfleischmatthias morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT spitalgeorg morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT lommatzschalbrecht morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages
AT pauleikhoffdaniel morphologicanalysisofmacularneovascularizationsbyoctangiographytechnicallimitationsinthecomparisonof33mmand66mmimages