Cargando…
The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
The majority of psychoacoustic research investigating sound localization has utilized stationary sources, yet most naturally occurring sounds are in motion, either because the sound source itself moves, or the listener does. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, previous research showed the extent to wh...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238125 |
_version_ | 1783574197997404160 |
---|---|
author | Warnecke, Michaela Peng, Z. Ellen Litovsky, Ruth Y. |
author_facet | Warnecke, Michaela Peng, Z. Ellen Litovsky, Ruth Y. |
author_sort | Warnecke, Michaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The majority of psychoacoustic research investigating sound localization has utilized stationary sources, yet most naturally occurring sounds are in motion, either because the sound source itself moves, or the listener does. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, previous research showed the extent to which sound duration and velocity impact the ability of listeners to detect sound movement. By contrast, little is known about how listeners with hearing impairments perceive moving sounds; the only study to date comparing the performance of NH and bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) listeners has demonstrated significantly poorer performance on motion detection tasks in BiCI listeners. Cochlear implants, auditory protheses offered to profoundly deaf individuals for access to spoken language, retain the signal envelope (ENV), while discarding temporal fine structure (TFS) of the original acoustic input. As a result, BiCI users do not have access to low-frequency TFS cues, which have previously been shown to be crucial for sound localization in NH listeners. Instead, BiCI listeners seem to rely on ENV cues for sound localization, especially level cues. Given that NH and BiCI listeners differentially utilize ENV and TFS information, the present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of these cues for auditory motion perception. We created acoustic chimaera stimuli, which allowed us to test the relative contributions of ENV and TFS to auditory motion perception. Stimuli were either moving or stationary, presented to NH listeners in free field. The task was to track the perceived sound location. We found that removing low-frequency TFS reduces sensitivity to sound motion, and fluctuating speech envelopes strongly biased the judgment of sounds to be stationary. Our findings yield a possible explanation as to why BiCI users struggle to identify sound motion, and provide a first account of cues important to the functional aspect of auditory motion perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7446836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74468362020-08-26 The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception Warnecke, Michaela Peng, Z. Ellen Litovsky, Ruth Y. PLoS One Research Article The majority of psychoacoustic research investigating sound localization has utilized stationary sources, yet most naturally occurring sounds are in motion, either because the sound source itself moves, or the listener does. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, previous research showed the extent to which sound duration and velocity impact the ability of listeners to detect sound movement. By contrast, little is known about how listeners with hearing impairments perceive moving sounds; the only study to date comparing the performance of NH and bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) listeners has demonstrated significantly poorer performance on motion detection tasks in BiCI listeners. Cochlear implants, auditory protheses offered to profoundly deaf individuals for access to spoken language, retain the signal envelope (ENV), while discarding temporal fine structure (TFS) of the original acoustic input. As a result, BiCI users do not have access to low-frequency TFS cues, which have previously been shown to be crucial for sound localization in NH listeners. Instead, BiCI listeners seem to rely on ENV cues for sound localization, especially level cues. Given that NH and BiCI listeners differentially utilize ENV and TFS information, the present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of these cues for auditory motion perception. We created acoustic chimaera stimuli, which allowed us to test the relative contributions of ENV and TFS to auditory motion perception. Stimuli were either moving or stationary, presented to NH listeners in free field. The task was to track the perceived sound location. We found that removing low-frequency TFS reduces sensitivity to sound motion, and fluctuating speech envelopes strongly biased the judgment of sounds to be stationary. Our findings yield a possible explanation as to why BiCI users struggle to identify sound motion, and provide a first account of cues important to the functional aspect of auditory motion perception. Public Library of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7446836/ /pubmed/32822439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238125 Text en © 2020 Warnecke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Warnecke, Michaela Peng, Z. Ellen Litovsky, Ruth Y. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
title | The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
title_full | The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
title_fullStr | The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
title_short | The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
title_sort | impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warneckemichaela theimpactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception AT pengzellen theimpactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception AT litovskyruthy theimpactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception AT warneckemichaela impactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception AT pengzellen impactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception AT litovskyruthy impactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception |