Cargando…

The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception

The majority of psychoacoustic research investigating sound localization has utilized stationary sources, yet most naturally occurring sounds are in motion, either because the sound source itself moves, or the listener does. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, previous research showed the extent to wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warnecke, Michaela, Peng, Z. Ellen, Litovsky, Ruth Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238125
_version_ 1783574197997404160
author Warnecke, Michaela
Peng, Z. Ellen
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
author_facet Warnecke, Michaela
Peng, Z. Ellen
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
author_sort Warnecke, Michaela
collection PubMed
description The majority of psychoacoustic research investigating sound localization has utilized stationary sources, yet most naturally occurring sounds are in motion, either because the sound source itself moves, or the listener does. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, previous research showed the extent to which sound duration and velocity impact the ability of listeners to detect sound movement. By contrast, little is known about how listeners with hearing impairments perceive moving sounds; the only study to date comparing the performance of NH and bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) listeners has demonstrated significantly poorer performance on motion detection tasks in BiCI listeners. Cochlear implants, auditory protheses offered to profoundly deaf individuals for access to spoken language, retain the signal envelope (ENV), while discarding temporal fine structure (TFS) of the original acoustic input. As a result, BiCI users do not have access to low-frequency TFS cues, which have previously been shown to be crucial for sound localization in NH listeners. Instead, BiCI listeners seem to rely on ENV cues for sound localization, especially level cues. Given that NH and BiCI listeners differentially utilize ENV and TFS information, the present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of these cues for auditory motion perception. We created acoustic chimaera stimuli, which allowed us to test the relative contributions of ENV and TFS to auditory motion perception. Stimuli were either moving or stationary, presented to NH listeners in free field. The task was to track the perceived sound location. We found that removing low-frequency TFS reduces sensitivity to sound motion, and fluctuating speech envelopes strongly biased the judgment of sounds to be stationary. Our findings yield a possible explanation as to why BiCI users struggle to identify sound motion, and provide a first account of cues important to the functional aspect of auditory motion perception.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74468362020-08-26 The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception Warnecke, Michaela Peng, Z. Ellen Litovsky, Ruth Y. PLoS One Research Article The majority of psychoacoustic research investigating sound localization has utilized stationary sources, yet most naturally occurring sounds are in motion, either because the sound source itself moves, or the listener does. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, previous research showed the extent to which sound duration and velocity impact the ability of listeners to detect sound movement. By contrast, little is known about how listeners with hearing impairments perceive moving sounds; the only study to date comparing the performance of NH and bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) listeners has demonstrated significantly poorer performance on motion detection tasks in BiCI listeners. Cochlear implants, auditory protheses offered to profoundly deaf individuals for access to spoken language, retain the signal envelope (ENV), while discarding temporal fine structure (TFS) of the original acoustic input. As a result, BiCI users do not have access to low-frequency TFS cues, which have previously been shown to be crucial for sound localization in NH listeners. Instead, BiCI listeners seem to rely on ENV cues for sound localization, especially level cues. Given that NH and BiCI listeners differentially utilize ENV and TFS information, the present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of these cues for auditory motion perception. We created acoustic chimaera stimuli, which allowed us to test the relative contributions of ENV and TFS to auditory motion perception. Stimuli were either moving or stationary, presented to NH listeners in free field. The task was to track the perceived sound location. We found that removing low-frequency TFS reduces sensitivity to sound motion, and fluctuating speech envelopes strongly biased the judgment of sounds to be stationary. Our findings yield a possible explanation as to why BiCI users struggle to identify sound motion, and provide a first account of cues important to the functional aspect of auditory motion perception. Public Library of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7446836/ /pubmed/32822439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238125 Text en © 2020 Warnecke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warnecke, Michaela
Peng, Z. Ellen
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
title The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
title_full The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
title_fullStr The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
title_full_unstemmed The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
title_short The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
title_sort impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238125
work_keys_str_mv AT warneckemichaela theimpactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception
AT pengzellen theimpactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception
AT litovskyruthy theimpactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception
AT warneckemichaela impactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception
AT pengzellen impactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception
AT litovskyruthy impactoftemporalfinestructureandsignalenvelopeonauditorymotionperception