Cargando…
The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
BACKGROUND: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients. METHODS: In thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236780 |
_version_ | 1783574208593264640 |
---|---|
author | Konrad, Karl Lorenz Baeyens, Jean-Pierre Birkenmaier, Christof Ranker, Anna Helena Widmann, Jonas Leukert, Johannes Wenisch, Lisa Kraft, Eduard Jansson, Volkmar Wegener, Bernd |
author_facet | Konrad, Karl Lorenz Baeyens, Jean-Pierre Birkenmaier, Christof Ranker, Anna Helena Widmann, Jonas Leukert, Johannes Wenisch, Lisa Kraft, Eduard Jansson, Volkmar Wegener, Bernd |
author_sort | Konrad, Karl Lorenz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients. METHODS: In this prospective and controlled nonrandomized clinical study, two therapeutic approaches were compared. One group received 20 minutes WB-EMS per week. An active control group (ACG) received a multimodal therapy program. A third group included subjects without back pain. To all groups, the following measurement instruments were applied: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), North American Spine Society Instrument (NASS); SF 36 survey and measurements for muscular function and postural stability. In the EMS-group: T0: baseline; T1: at 6 weeks; T2: at 12 weeks and T3: at 24 weeks. In the ACG: T0 baseline and T1 after 4 weeks. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 128 patients with low back pain were enrolled, 85 in the WB-EMS group and 43 in the ACG. 34 subjects were allocated to the passive control group. The average age was 58.6 years (18–86 years). In the EMS group, the NRS (1–10) improved statistically and clinically significantly by 2 points. The ODI was reduced by 19.7 points. The NASS and most of the SF 36 items improved significantly. In the multimodal treatment group, only the muscular function improved slightly. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that WB-EMS is at least as effective as a multimodal treatment, which is often referred to as being the golden standard. Therefore WB-EMS may be an effective and, with 20 min./week training time, very time-efficient alternative to established multimodal treatment models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7446884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74468842020-08-26 The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study Konrad, Karl Lorenz Baeyens, Jean-Pierre Birkenmaier, Christof Ranker, Anna Helena Widmann, Jonas Leukert, Johannes Wenisch, Lisa Kraft, Eduard Jansson, Volkmar Wegener, Bernd PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients. METHODS: In this prospective and controlled nonrandomized clinical study, two therapeutic approaches were compared. One group received 20 minutes WB-EMS per week. An active control group (ACG) received a multimodal therapy program. A third group included subjects without back pain. To all groups, the following measurement instruments were applied: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), North American Spine Society Instrument (NASS); SF 36 survey and measurements for muscular function and postural stability. In the EMS-group: T0: baseline; T1: at 6 weeks; T2: at 12 weeks and T3: at 24 weeks. In the ACG: T0 baseline and T1 after 4 weeks. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 128 patients with low back pain were enrolled, 85 in the WB-EMS group and 43 in the ACG. 34 subjects were allocated to the passive control group. The average age was 58.6 years (18–86 years). In the EMS group, the NRS (1–10) improved statistically and clinically significantly by 2 points. The ODI was reduced by 19.7 points. The NASS and most of the SF 36 items improved significantly. In the multimodal treatment group, only the muscular function improved slightly. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that WB-EMS is at least as effective as a multimodal treatment, which is often referred to as being the golden standard. Therefore WB-EMS may be an effective and, with 20 min./week training time, very time-efficient alternative to established multimodal treatment models. Public Library of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7446884/ /pubmed/32822361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236780 Text en © 2020 Konrad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Konrad, Karl Lorenz Baeyens, Jean-Pierre Birkenmaier, Christof Ranker, Anna Helena Widmann, Jonas Leukert, Johannes Wenisch, Lisa Kraft, Eduard Jansson, Volkmar Wegener, Bernd The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study |
title | The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study |
title_full | The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study |
title_fullStr | The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study |
title_short | The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study |
title_sort | effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (wb-ems) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—a prospective clinical intervention study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konradkarllorenz theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT baeyensjeanpierre theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT birkenmaierchristof theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT rankerannahelena theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT widmannjonas theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT leukertjohannes theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT wenischlisa theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT krafteduard theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT janssonvolkmar theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT wegenerbernd theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT konradkarllorenz effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT baeyensjeanpierre effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT birkenmaierchristof effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT rankerannahelena effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT widmannjonas effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT leukertjohannes effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT wenischlisa effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT krafteduard effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT janssonvolkmar effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy AT wegenerbernd effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy |