Cargando…

The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study

BACKGROUND: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients. METHODS: In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konrad, Karl Lorenz, Baeyens, Jean-Pierre, Birkenmaier, Christof, Ranker, Anna Helena, Widmann, Jonas, Leukert, Johannes, Wenisch, Lisa, Kraft, Eduard, Jansson, Volkmar, Wegener, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236780
_version_ 1783574208593264640
author Konrad, Karl Lorenz
Baeyens, Jean-Pierre
Birkenmaier, Christof
Ranker, Anna Helena
Widmann, Jonas
Leukert, Johannes
Wenisch, Lisa
Kraft, Eduard
Jansson, Volkmar
Wegener, Bernd
author_facet Konrad, Karl Lorenz
Baeyens, Jean-Pierre
Birkenmaier, Christof
Ranker, Anna Helena
Widmann, Jonas
Leukert, Johannes
Wenisch, Lisa
Kraft, Eduard
Jansson, Volkmar
Wegener, Bernd
author_sort Konrad, Karl Lorenz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients. METHODS: In this prospective and controlled nonrandomized clinical study, two therapeutic approaches were compared. One group received 20 minutes WB-EMS per week. An active control group (ACG) received a multimodal therapy program. A third group included subjects without back pain. To all groups, the following measurement instruments were applied: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), North American Spine Society Instrument (NASS); SF 36 survey and measurements for muscular function and postural stability. In the EMS-group: T0: baseline; T1: at 6 weeks; T2: at 12 weeks and T3: at 24 weeks. In the ACG: T0 baseline and T1 after 4 weeks. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 128 patients with low back pain were enrolled, 85 in the WB-EMS group and 43 in the ACG. 34 subjects were allocated to the passive control group. The average age was 58.6 years (18–86 years). In the EMS group, the NRS (1–10) improved statistically and clinically significantly by 2 points. The ODI was reduced by 19.7 points. The NASS and most of the SF 36 items improved significantly. In the multimodal treatment group, only the muscular function improved slightly. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that WB-EMS is at least as effective as a multimodal treatment, which is often referred to as being the golden standard. Therefore WB-EMS may be an effective and, with 20 min./week training time, very time-efficient alternative to established multimodal treatment models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74468842020-08-26 The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study Konrad, Karl Lorenz Baeyens, Jean-Pierre Birkenmaier, Christof Ranker, Anna Helena Widmann, Jonas Leukert, Johannes Wenisch, Lisa Kraft, Eduard Jansson, Volkmar Wegener, Bernd PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients. METHODS: In this prospective and controlled nonrandomized clinical study, two therapeutic approaches were compared. One group received 20 minutes WB-EMS per week. An active control group (ACG) received a multimodal therapy program. A third group included subjects without back pain. To all groups, the following measurement instruments were applied: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), North American Spine Society Instrument (NASS); SF 36 survey and measurements for muscular function and postural stability. In the EMS-group: T0: baseline; T1: at 6 weeks; T2: at 12 weeks and T3: at 24 weeks. In the ACG: T0 baseline and T1 after 4 weeks. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 128 patients with low back pain were enrolled, 85 in the WB-EMS group and 43 in the ACG. 34 subjects were allocated to the passive control group. The average age was 58.6 years (18–86 years). In the EMS group, the NRS (1–10) improved statistically and clinically significantly by 2 points. The ODI was reduced by 19.7 points. The NASS and most of the SF 36 items improved significantly. In the multimodal treatment group, only the muscular function improved slightly. CONCLUSION: Our data support the hypothesis that WB-EMS is at least as effective as a multimodal treatment, which is often referred to as being the golden standard. Therefore WB-EMS may be an effective and, with 20 min./week training time, very time-efficient alternative to established multimodal treatment models. Public Library of Science 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7446884/ /pubmed/32822361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236780 Text en © 2020 Konrad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Konrad, Karl Lorenz
Baeyens, Jean-Pierre
Birkenmaier, Christof
Ranker, Anna Helena
Widmann, Jonas
Leukert, Johannes
Wenisch, Lisa
Kraft, Eduard
Jansson, Volkmar
Wegener, Bernd
The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
title The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
title_full The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
title_fullStr The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
title_full_unstemmed The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
title_short The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—A prospective clinical intervention study
title_sort effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (wb-ems) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain—a prospective clinical intervention study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32822361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236780
work_keys_str_mv AT konradkarllorenz theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT baeyensjeanpierre theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT birkenmaierchristof theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT rankerannahelena theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT widmannjonas theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT leukertjohannes theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT wenischlisa theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT krafteduard theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT janssonvolkmar theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT wegenerbernd theeffectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT konradkarllorenz effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT baeyensjeanpierre effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT birkenmaierchristof effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT rankerannahelena effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT widmannjonas effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT leukertjohannes effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT wenischlisa effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT krafteduard effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT janssonvolkmar effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy
AT wegenerbernd effectsofwholebodyelectromyostimulationwbemsincomparisontoamultimodaltreatmentconceptinpatientswithnonspecificchronicbackpainaprospectiveclinicalinterventionstudy