Cargando…

Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simard, Trevor, Motazedian, Pouya, Majeed, Kamran, Sarathy, Kiran, Jung, Richard G., Feder, Joshua, Ramirez, F. Daniel, Di Santo, Pietro, Marbach, Jeffrey, Dhaliwal, Shan, Short, Spencer, Labinaz, Alisha, Schultz, Carl, Russo, Juan J., So, Derek, Chong, Aun-Yeong, Le May, Michel, Hibbert, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237588
_version_ 1783574211817635840
author Simard, Trevor
Motazedian, Pouya
Majeed, Kamran
Sarathy, Kiran
Jung, Richard G.
Feder, Joshua
Ramirez, F. Daniel
Di Santo, Pietro
Marbach, Jeffrey
Dhaliwal, Shan
Short, Spencer
Labinaz, Alisha
Schultz, Carl
Russo, Juan J.
So, Derek
Chong, Aun-Yeong
Le May, Michel
Hibbert, Benjamin
author_facet Simard, Trevor
Motazedian, Pouya
Majeed, Kamran
Sarathy, Kiran
Jung, Richard G.
Feder, Joshua
Ramirez, F. Daniel
Di Santo, Pietro
Marbach, Jeffrey
Dhaliwal, Shan
Short, Spencer
Labinaz, Alisha
Schultz, Carl
Russo, Juan J.
So, Derek
Chong, Aun-Yeong
Le May, Michel
Hibbert, Benjamin
author_sort Simard, Trevor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contrast dye to achieve the required blood clearance during acquisition. We sought to systematically evaluate the technical performance of saline as an alternative to iodinated contrast for intravascular optical coherence tomography assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed bench top optical coherence tomography analysis on nylon tubing with sequential contrast/saline dilutions to empirically derive adjustment coefficients. We then applied these coefficients in vivo in an established rabbit abdominal stenting model with both saline and contrast optical coherence tomography imaging. In this model, we assessed the impact of saline on both quantitative and qualitative vessel assessment. Nylon tubing assessment demonstrated a linear relationship between saline and contrast for both area and diameter. We then derived adjustment coefficients, allowing for accurate calculation of area and diameter when converting saline into both contrast and reference dimensions. In vivo studies confirmed reduced area with saline versus contrast [7.43 (5.67–8.36) mm(2) versus 8.2 (6.34–9.39) mm(2), p = 0.001] and diameter [3.08 mm versus 3.23 mm, p = 0.001]. Following correction, a strong relationship was achieved in vivo between saline and contrast in both area and diameter without compromising image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. CONCLUSION: Saline generates reduced dimensions compared to contrast during intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging. The relationship across physiologic coronary diameters is linear and can be corrected with high fidelity. Saline does not adversely impact image quality, artefact, or strut assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74468992020-08-26 Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment Simard, Trevor Motazedian, Pouya Majeed, Kamran Sarathy, Kiran Jung, Richard G. Feder, Joshua Ramirez, F. Daniel Di Santo, Pietro Marbach, Jeffrey Dhaliwal, Shan Short, Spencer Labinaz, Alisha Schultz, Carl Russo, Juan J. So, Derek Chong, Aun-Yeong Le May, Michel Hibbert, Benjamin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contrast dye to achieve the required blood clearance during acquisition. We sought to systematically evaluate the technical performance of saline as an alternative to iodinated contrast for intravascular optical coherence tomography assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed bench top optical coherence tomography analysis on nylon tubing with sequential contrast/saline dilutions to empirically derive adjustment coefficients. We then applied these coefficients in vivo in an established rabbit abdominal stenting model with both saline and contrast optical coherence tomography imaging. In this model, we assessed the impact of saline on both quantitative and qualitative vessel assessment. Nylon tubing assessment demonstrated a linear relationship between saline and contrast for both area and diameter. We then derived adjustment coefficients, allowing for accurate calculation of area and diameter when converting saline into both contrast and reference dimensions. In vivo studies confirmed reduced area with saline versus contrast [7.43 (5.67–8.36) mm(2) versus 8.2 (6.34–9.39) mm(2), p = 0.001] and diameter [3.08 mm versus 3.23 mm, p = 0.001]. Following correction, a strong relationship was achieved in vivo between saline and contrast in both area and diameter without compromising image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. CONCLUSION: Saline generates reduced dimensions compared to contrast during intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging. The relationship across physiologic coronary diameters is linear and can be corrected with high fidelity. Saline does not adversely impact image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. Public Library of Science 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7446899/ /pubmed/32817672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237588 Text en © 2020 Simard et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simard, Trevor
Motazedian, Pouya
Majeed, Kamran
Sarathy, Kiran
Jung, Richard G.
Feder, Joshua
Ramirez, F. Daniel
Di Santo, Pietro
Marbach, Jeffrey
Dhaliwal, Shan
Short, Spencer
Labinaz, Alisha
Schultz, Carl
Russo, Juan J.
So, Derek
Chong, Aun-Yeong
Le May, Michel
Hibbert, Benjamin
Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
title Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
title_full Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
title_fullStr Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
title_full_unstemmed Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
title_short Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
title_sort contrast-free optical coherence tomography:systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237588
work_keys_str_mv AT simardtrevor contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT motazedianpouya contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT majeedkamran contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT sarathykiran contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT jungrichardg contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT federjoshua contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT ramirezfdaniel contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT disantopietro contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT marbachjeffrey contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT dhaliwalshan contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT shortspencer contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT labinazalisha contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT schultzcarl contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT russojuanj contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT soderek contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT chongaunyeong contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT lemaymichel contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment
AT hibbertbenjamin contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment