Cargando…
Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment
BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237588 |
_version_ | 1783574211817635840 |
---|---|
author | Simard, Trevor Motazedian, Pouya Majeed, Kamran Sarathy, Kiran Jung, Richard G. Feder, Joshua Ramirez, F. Daniel Di Santo, Pietro Marbach, Jeffrey Dhaliwal, Shan Short, Spencer Labinaz, Alisha Schultz, Carl Russo, Juan J. So, Derek Chong, Aun-Yeong Le May, Michel Hibbert, Benjamin |
author_facet | Simard, Trevor Motazedian, Pouya Majeed, Kamran Sarathy, Kiran Jung, Richard G. Feder, Joshua Ramirez, F. Daniel Di Santo, Pietro Marbach, Jeffrey Dhaliwal, Shan Short, Spencer Labinaz, Alisha Schultz, Carl Russo, Juan J. So, Derek Chong, Aun-Yeong Le May, Michel Hibbert, Benjamin |
author_sort | Simard, Trevor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contrast dye to achieve the required blood clearance during acquisition. We sought to systematically evaluate the technical performance of saline as an alternative to iodinated contrast for intravascular optical coherence tomography assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed bench top optical coherence tomography analysis on nylon tubing with sequential contrast/saline dilutions to empirically derive adjustment coefficients. We then applied these coefficients in vivo in an established rabbit abdominal stenting model with both saline and contrast optical coherence tomography imaging. In this model, we assessed the impact of saline on both quantitative and qualitative vessel assessment. Nylon tubing assessment demonstrated a linear relationship between saline and contrast for both area and diameter. We then derived adjustment coefficients, allowing for accurate calculation of area and diameter when converting saline into both contrast and reference dimensions. In vivo studies confirmed reduced area with saline versus contrast [7.43 (5.67–8.36) mm(2) versus 8.2 (6.34–9.39) mm(2), p = 0.001] and diameter [3.08 mm versus 3.23 mm, p = 0.001]. Following correction, a strong relationship was achieved in vivo between saline and contrast in both area and diameter without compromising image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. CONCLUSION: Saline generates reduced dimensions compared to contrast during intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging. The relationship across physiologic coronary diameters is linear and can be corrected with high fidelity. Saline does not adversely impact image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7446899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74468992020-08-26 Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment Simard, Trevor Motazedian, Pouya Majeed, Kamran Sarathy, Kiran Jung, Richard G. Feder, Joshua Ramirez, F. Daniel Di Santo, Pietro Marbach, Jeffrey Dhaliwal, Shan Short, Spencer Labinaz, Alisha Schultz, Carl Russo, Juan J. So, Derek Chong, Aun-Yeong Le May, Michel Hibbert, Benjamin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization using imaging guidance is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Intravascular optical coherence tomography uses near-infrared light to obtain high resolution intravascular images. Standard optical coherence tomography imaging technique employs iodinated contrast dye to achieve the required blood clearance during acquisition. We sought to systematically evaluate the technical performance of saline as an alternative to iodinated contrast for intravascular optical coherence tomography assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed bench top optical coherence tomography analysis on nylon tubing with sequential contrast/saline dilutions to empirically derive adjustment coefficients. We then applied these coefficients in vivo in an established rabbit abdominal stenting model with both saline and contrast optical coherence tomography imaging. In this model, we assessed the impact of saline on both quantitative and qualitative vessel assessment. Nylon tubing assessment demonstrated a linear relationship between saline and contrast for both area and diameter. We then derived adjustment coefficients, allowing for accurate calculation of area and diameter when converting saline into both contrast and reference dimensions. In vivo studies confirmed reduced area with saline versus contrast [7.43 (5.67–8.36) mm(2) versus 8.2 (6.34–9.39) mm(2), p = 0.001] and diameter [3.08 mm versus 3.23 mm, p = 0.001]. Following correction, a strong relationship was achieved in vivo between saline and contrast in both area and diameter without compromising image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. CONCLUSION: Saline generates reduced dimensions compared to contrast during intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging. The relationship across physiologic coronary diameters is linear and can be corrected with high fidelity. Saline does not adversely impact image quality, artefact, or strut assessment. Public Library of Science 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7446899/ /pubmed/32817672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237588 Text en © 2020 Simard et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Simard, Trevor Motazedian, Pouya Majeed, Kamran Sarathy, Kiran Jung, Richard G. Feder, Joshua Ramirez, F. Daniel Di Santo, Pietro Marbach, Jeffrey Dhaliwal, Shan Short, Spencer Labinaz, Alisha Schultz, Carl Russo, Juan J. So, Derek Chong, Aun-Yeong Le May, Michel Hibbert, Benjamin Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
title | Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
title_full | Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
title_fullStr | Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
title_short | Contrast-free optical coherence tomography:Systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
title_sort | contrast-free optical coherence tomography:systematic evaluation of non-contrast media for intravascular assessment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32817672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simardtrevor contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT motazedianpouya contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT majeedkamran contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT sarathykiran contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT jungrichardg contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT federjoshua contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT ramirezfdaniel contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT disantopietro contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT marbachjeffrey contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT dhaliwalshan contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT shortspencer contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT labinazalisha contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT schultzcarl contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT russojuanj contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT soderek contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT chongaunyeong contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT lemaymichel contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment AT hibbertbenjamin contrastfreeopticalcoherencetomographysystematicevaluationofnoncontrastmediaforintravascularassessment |