Cargando…

A Genome-Wide Pharmacogenetic Study of Growth Hormone Responsiveness

CONTEXT: Individual patients vary in their response to growth hormone (GH). No large-scale genome-wide studies have looked for genetic predictors of GH responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic variants associated with GH responsiveness. DESIGN: Genome-wide association study (GWAS). SETTING: Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dauber, Andrew, Meng, Yan, Audi, Laura, Vedantam, Sailaja, Weaver, Benjamin, Carrascosa, Antonio, Albertsson-Wikland, Kerstin, Ranke, Michael B, Jorge, Alexander A L, Cara, Jose, Wajnrajch, Michael P, Lindberg, Anders, Camacho-Hübner, Cecilia, Hirschhorn, Joel N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa443
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Individual patients vary in their response to growth hormone (GH). No large-scale genome-wide studies have looked for genetic predictors of GH responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic variants associated with GH responsiveness. DESIGN: Genome-wide association study (GWAS). SETTING: Cohorts from multiple academic centers and a clinical trial. PATIENTS: A total of 614 individuals from 5 short stature cohorts receiving GH: 297 with idiopathic short stature, 276 with isolated GH deficiency, and 65 born small for gestational age. INTERVENTION: Association of more than 2 million variants was tested. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary analysis: individual single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association with first-year change in height standard deviation scores. Secondary analyses: SNP associations in clinical subgroups adjusted for clinical variables; association of polygenic score calculated from 697 genome-wide significant height SNPs with GH responsiveness. RESULTS: No common variant associations reached genome-wide significance in the primary analysis. The strongest suggestive signals were found near the B4GALT4 and TBCE genes. After meta-analysis including replication data, signals at several loci reached or retained genome-wide significance in secondary analyses, including variants near ST3GAL6. There was no significant association with variants previously reported to be associated with GH response nor with a polygenic predicted height score. CONCLUSIONS: We performed the largest GWAS of GH responsiveness to date. We identified 2 loci with a suggestive effect on GH responsiveness in our primary analysis and several genome-wide significant associations in secondary analyses that require further replication. Our results are consistent with a polygenic component to GH responsiveness, likely distinct from the genetic regulators of adult height.