Cargando…

A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease

OBJECTIVE: While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance aspects of memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been wide variability in both the placement of tDCS electrodes and treatment response. This study compared the effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Celina S., Herrmann, Nathan, Gallagher, Damien, Rajji, Tarek K., Kiss, Alex, Vieira, Danielle, Lanctôt, Krista L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31790015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000639
_version_ 1783574249965879296
author Liu, Celina S.
Herrmann, Nathan
Gallagher, Damien
Rajji, Tarek K.
Kiss, Alex
Vieira, Danielle
Lanctôt, Krista L.
author_facet Liu, Celina S.
Herrmann, Nathan
Gallagher, Damien
Rajji, Tarek K.
Kiss, Alex
Vieira, Danielle
Lanctôt, Krista L.
author_sort Liu, Celina S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance aspects of memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been wide variability in both the placement of tDCS electrodes and treatment response. This study compared the effects of bifrontal (anodal stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices), bitemporal (anodal stimulation over the temporal cortices), and sham tDCS on cognitive performance in MCI and AD. METHODS: Seventeen patients diagnosed with MCI or mild AD received 3 sessions of anodal tDCS (bifrontal, bitemporal, 2 mA for 20 minutes; and sham) in random order. Sessions were separated by 1 week. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recognition Task, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recall Task, 2-back, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess cognition. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of stimulation condition on 2-back accuracy (F(2,28) = 5.28 P = 0.01, η(2)p = 0.27), with greater improvements following bitemporal tDCS compared with both bifrontal and sham stimulations. There were no significant changes on other outcome measures following any stimulation. Adverse effects from stimulation were mild and temporary. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that improvements in specific memory tasks can be safely achieved after a single session of bitemporal tDCS in MCI and mild AD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7447169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74471692020-09-11 A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease Liu, Celina S. Herrmann, Nathan Gallagher, Damien Rajji, Tarek K. Kiss, Alex Vieira, Danielle Lanctôt, Krista L. J ECT Original Studies OBJECTIVE: While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance aspects of memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD), there has been wide variability in both the placement of tDCS electrodes and treatment response. This study compared the effects of bifrontal (anodal stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices), bitemporal (anodal stimulation over the temporal cortices), and sham tDCS on cognitive performance in MCI and AD. METHODS: Seventeen patients diagnosed with MCI or mild AD received 3 sessions of anodal tDCS (bifrontal, bitemporal, 2 mA for 20 minutes; and sham) in random order. Sessions were separated by 1 week. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recognition Task, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Word Recall Task, 2-back, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess cognition. RESULTS: There was a significant effect of stimulation condition on 2-back accuracy (F(2,28) = 5.28 P = 0.01, η(2)p = 0.27), with greater improvements following bitemporal tDCS compared with both bifrontal and sham stimulations. There were no significant changes on other outcome measures following any stimulation. Adverse effects from stimulation were mild and temporary. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that improvements in specific memory tasks can be safely achieved after a single session of bitemporal tDCS in MCI and mild AD patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09 2020-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7447169/ /pubmed/31790015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000639 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Studies
Liu, Celina S.
Herrmann, Nathan
Gallagher, Damien
Rajji, Tarek K.
Kiss, Alex
Vieira, Danielle
Lanctôt, Krista L.
A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease
title A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease
title_full A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease
title_fullStr A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease
title_short A Pilot Study Comparing Effects of Bifrontal Versus Bitemporal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer Disease
title_sort pilot study comparing effects of bifrontal versus bitemporal transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment and mild alzheimer disease
topic Original Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31790015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000639
work_keys_str_mv AT liucelinas apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT herrmannnathan apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT gallagherdamien apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT rajjitarekk apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT kissalex apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT vieiradanielle apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT lanctotkristal apilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT liucelinas pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT herrmannnathan pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT gallagherdamien pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT rajjitarekk pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT kissalex pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT vieiradanielle pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease
AT lanctotkristal pilotstudycomparingeffectsofbifrontalversusbitemporaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationinmildcognitiveimpairmentandmildalzheimerdisease