Cargando…
Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed
Epidemic forecasting has a dubious track-record, and its failures became more prominent with COVID-19. Poor data input, wrong modeling assumptions, high sensitivity of estimates, lack of incorporation of epidemiological features, poor past evidence on effects of available interventions, lack of tran...
Autores principales: | Ioannidis, John P.A., Cripps, Sally, Tanner, Martin A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32863495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effect estimates of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions are non-robust and highly model-dependent
por: Chin, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A case study in model failure? COVID-19 daily deaths and ICU bed utilisation predictions in New York state
por: Chin, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Has Pasteur Failed?
Publicado: (1890) -
High-cited favorable studies for COVID-19 treatments ineffective in large trials
por: Ioannidis, John P.A.
Publicado: (2022) -
COVID-19 models and expectations – Learning from the pandemic
por: Ioannidis, John P.A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)