Cargando…

Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience

INTRODUCTION: Patient-specific instrumentation is an emerging technology with the promise of a better fit to patient anatomy. With the advent of deformity correction planning software, prefabricated rods can mitigate the need to bend rods in the operating room. Prefabricated rods allow the surgeon t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadrameli, Saeed S., Boghani, Zain, Steele III, William J., Holman, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864493
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0101
_version_ 1783574276850319360
author Sadrameli, Saeed S.
Boghani, Zain
Steele III, William J.
Holman, Paul J.
author_facet Sadrameli, Saeed S.
Boghani, Zain
Steele III, William J.
Holman, Paul J.
author_sort Sadrameli, Saeed S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient-specific instrumentation is an emerging technology with the promise of a better fit to patient anatomy. With the advent of deformity correction planning software, prefabricated rods can mitigate the need to bend rods in the operating room. Prefabricated rods allow the surgeon to provide a deformity correction closely in line with the surgical plan. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed, and all patients with Medicrea UNiD rod were included. A minimum of 3 week follow up upright 36-inch lateral radiograph was necessary for analysis. Overall 21 patients had Medicrea UNiD rods placed; four were excluded (one for cervicothoracic fusion, three for incomplete follow up). Pelvic parameters were documented from the preoperative, surgical plan, and postoperative radiographs using Surgimap (Nemaris Inc, NY). The parameters for the rods were based on the surgical plan. Paired t-tests were used to compare the preoperative, surgical plan, and postoperative pelvic parameters. RESULTS: Average lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis in preoperative radiographs were 35.12°, 24.82°, 28.65°, and 65.65 mm, respectively. In postoperative imaging, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis were 57.00°, 18.00°, 35.71°, and 21.59 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis between the preoperative film and surgical plan (p < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was found between the surgical plan and postoperative pelvic parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cases in which prefabricated rods were utilized demonstrated improved spinopelvic alignment. Additionally, there was no statistical difference between the surgical plan and postoperative imaging in terms of pelvic parameters. Future studies are needed to investigate the possible benefits of prefabricated rods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7447337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74473372020-08-27 Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience Sadrameli, Saeed S. Boghani, Zain Steele III, William J. Holman, Paul J. Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Patient-specific instrumentation is an emerging technology with the promise of a better fit to patient anatomy. With the advent of deformity correction planning software, prefabricated rods can mitigate the need to bend rods in the operating room. Prefabricated rods allow the surgeon to provide a deformity correction closely in line with the surgical plan. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed, and all patients with Medicrea UNiD rod were included. A minimum of 3 week follow up upright 36-inch lateral radiograph was necessary for analysis. Overall 21 patients had Medicrea UNiD rods placed; four were excluded (one for cervicothoracic fusion, three for incomplete follow up). Pelvic parameters were documented from the preoperative, surgical plan, and postoperative radiographs using Surgimap (Nemaris Inc, NY). The parameters for the rods were based on the surgical plan. Paired t-tests were used to compare the preoperative, surgical plan, and postoperative pelvic parameters. RESULTS: Average lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis in preoperative radiographs were 35.12°, 24.82°, 28.65°, and 65.65 mm, respectively. In postoperative imaging, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis were 57.00°, 18.00°, 35.71°, and 21.59 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis between the preoperative film and surgical plan (p < 0.001), whereas no statistically significant difference was found between the surgical plan and postoperative pelvic parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cases in which prefabricated rods were utilized demonstrated improved spinopelvic alignment. Additionally, there was no statistical difference between the surgical plan and postoperative imaging in terms of pelvic parameters. Future studies are needed to investigate the possible benefits of prefabricated rods. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7447337/ /pubmed/32864493 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0101 Text en Copyright © 2020 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadrameli, Saeed S.
Boghani, Zain
Steele III, William J.
Holman, Paul J.
Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience
title Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience
title_full Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience
title_fullStr Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience
title_short Utility of Patient-Specific Rod Instrumentation in Deformity Correction: Single Institution Experience
title_sort utility of patient-specific rod instrumentation in deformity correction: single institution experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864493
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2019-0101
work_keys_str_mv AT sadramelisaeeds utilityofpatientspecificrodinstrumentationindeformitycorrectionsingleinstitutionexperience
AT boghanizain utilityofpatientspecificrodinstrumentationindeformitycorrectionsingleinstitutionexperience
AT steeleiiiwilliamj utilityofpatientspecificrodinstrumentationindeformitycorrectionsingleinstitutionexperience
AT holmanpaulj utilityofpatientspecificrodinstrumentationindeformitycorrectionsingleinstitutionexperience