Cargando…

Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuperman, Pora, Granovsky, Yelena, Bahouth, Hany, Fadel, Shiri, Ben Lulu, Hen, Bosak, Noam, Buxbaum, Chen, Sprecher, Elliot, Crystal, Shoshana, Granot, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821
_version_ 1783574286476247040
author Kuperman, Pora
Granovsky, Yelena
Bahouth, Hany
Fadel, Shiri
Ben Lulu, Hen
Bosak, Noam
Buxbaum, Chen
Sprecher, Elliot
Crystal, Shoshana
Granot, Michal
author_facet Kuperman, Pora
Granovsky, Yelena
Bahouth, Hany
Fadel, Shiri
Ben Lulu, Hen
Bosak, Noam
Buxbaum, Chen
Sprecher, Elliot
Crystal, Shoshana
Granot, Michal
author_sort Kuperman, Pora
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by quantitative sensory testing. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) may reflect inherent psychocognitive representations of patient's sensitivity and thus may reveal less-explored pain dimensions. In the vein of the biopsychosocial approach, this study aimed to explore whether PSQ holds additive value in explaining head and neck pain reports in very early acute-stage mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) after collision, above the use of psychophysical assessment. METHODS: Study cohort (n = 130) consisted of mTBI patients (age range 19–66, 57 F) after accident with area-of-injury pain of at least 20 on the day of testing (mean pain 58.4 ± 21.6, range 20–100 Numerical Pain Scale) who underwent clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological assessment within 72-hour after injury. RESULTS: Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with acute clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological measures. Regression model (R(2) = 0.241, P < 0.001) showed that, together, age, sex, high PSQ, enhanced temporal summation, and less-efficient conditioned pain modulation explained head and neck pain variance. This model demonstrated that the strongest contribution to degree of postinjury pain was independently explained by PSQ (ß = 0.32) and then pressure pain threshold-conditioned pain modulation (ß = −0.25). CONCLUSION: Appraisal of cognitive daily-pain representations, by way of memory and imagination, provides an additional important dispositional facet to explain the variability in the acute mTBI postcollision clinical pain experience, above assessing nociceptive responsiveness to experimentally induced pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7447377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74473772020-09-04 Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire Kuperman, Pora Granovsky, Yelena Bahouth, Hany Fadel, Shiri Ben Lulu, Hen Bosak, Noam Buxbaum, Chen Sprecher, Elliot Crystal, Shoshana Granot, Michal Pain Rep Acute and Perioperative INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by quantitative sensory testing. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) may reflect inherent psychocognitive representations of patient's sensitivity and thus may reveal less-explored pain dimensions. In the vein of the biopsychosocial approach, this study aimed to explore whether PSQ holds additive value in explaining head and neck pain reports in very early acute-stage mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) after collision, above the use of psychophysical assessment. METHODS: Study cohort (n = 130) consisted of mTBI patients (age range 19–66, 57 F) after accident with area-of-injury pain of at least 20 on the day of testing (mean pain 58.4 ± 21.6, range 20–100 Numerical Pain Scale) who underwent clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological assessment within 72-hour after injury. RESULTS: Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with acute clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological measures. Regression model (R(2) = 0.241, P < 0.001) showed that, together, age, sex, high PSQ, enhanced temporal summation, and less-efficient conditioned pain modulation explained head and neck pain variance. This model demonstrated that the strongest contribution to degree of postinjury pain was independently explained by PSQ (ß = 0.32) and then pressure pain threshold-conditioned pain modulation (ß = −0.25). CONCLUSION: Appraisal of cognitive daily-pain representations, by way of memory and imagination, provides an additional important dispositional facet to explain the variability in the acute mTBI postcollision clinical pain experience, above assessing nociceptive responsiveness to experimentally induced pain. Wolters Kluwer 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7447377/ /pubmed/32903910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
spellingShingle Acute and Perioperative
Kuperman, Pora
Granovsky, Yelena
Bahouth, Hany
Fadel, Shiri
Ben Lulu, Hen
Bosak, Noam
Buxbaum, Chen
Sprecher, Elliot
Crystal, Shoshana
Granot, Michal
Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
title Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
title_full Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
title_fullStr Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
title_short Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
title_sort explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
topic Acute and Perioperative
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821
work_keys_str_mv AT kupermanpora explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT granovskyyelena explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT bahouthhany explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT fadelshiri explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT benluluhen explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT bosaknoam explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT buxbaumchen explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT sprecherelliot explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT crystalshoshana explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire
AT granotmichal explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire