Cargando…
Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment
PURPOSE: So far there is little evidence on peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in radiation oncology patients maintaining the access during the periods of ambulatory and hospital treatment. METHODS: A total of 522 PICC placements in 484 patients were performed between 11/2011 and 0...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0 |
_version_ | 1783574348279316480 |
---|---|
author | Mielke, Dorothea Wittig, Andrea Teichgräber, Ulf |
author_facet | Mielke, Dorothea Wittig, Andrea Teichgräber, Ulf |
author_sort | Mielke, Dorothea |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: So far there is little evidence on peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in radiation oncology patients maintaining the access during the periods of ambulatory and hospital treatment. METHODS: A total of 522 PICC placements in 484 patients were performed between 11/2011 and 07/2016 at the Department of Radiation Oncology and analysed retrospectively for complications and treatment- and patient-related factors during ambulatory and hospital inpatient use. On initial hospitalization, all patients received a multimodal radio-oncological treatment consisting of radiation and intravenous therapy administered via the PICC. RESULTS: A total of 18,292 catheter days were documented. Median follow-up from catheter insertion to their removal was 37 days (1–97). The overall complication rate was 4.1 per 1000 catheter days (n = 75, 14.4%). Complications were similar between the cohort of outpatient 3.6 per 1000 catheter days and the cohort of inpatient 4.8 per 1000 catheter days (OR 0.976; 95% CI [0.598; 1.619]; p = 0.924). Severe bloodstream infections occurred at a rate of 0.60 per 1000 catheter days (n = 11, 2.1%), deep vein thrombosis at a rate of 0.82 per 1.000 catheter days (n = 15, 2.9%) and local inflammation at a rate of 1.26 per 1.000 catheter days (n = 23, 4.4%). Only immunotherapy could be identified as an independent risk factor for complications (OR 5.6; 95% CI [2.4; 13.1]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using PICC in outpatients is not associated with an elevated risk of complications. Particular attention should be payed to early identification of PICC associated bloodstream infections. Immunotherapy is an independent risk factor for local skin complication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7447660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74476602020-09-02 Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment Mielke, Dorothea Wittig, Andrea Teichgräber, Ulf Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: So far there is little evidence on peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in radiation oncology patients maintaining the access during the periods of ambulatory and hospital treatment. METHODS: A total of 522 PICC placements in 484 patients were performed between 11/2011 and 07/2016 at the Department of Radiation Oncology and analysed retrospectively for complications and treatment- and patient-related factors during ambulatory and hospital inpatient use. On initial hospitalization, all patients received a multimodal radio-oncological treatment consisting of radiation and intravenous therapy administered via the PICC. RESULTS: A total of 18,292 catheter days were documented. Median follow-up from catheter insertion to their removal was 37 days (1–97). The overall complication rate was 4.1 per 1000 catheter days (n = 75, 14.4%). Complications were similar between the cohort of outpatient 3.6 per 1000 catheter days and the cohort of inpatient 4.8 per 1000 catheter days (OR 0.976; 95% CI [0.598; 1.619]; p = 0.924). Severe bloodstream infections occurred at a rate of 0.60 per 1000 catheter days (n = 11, 2.1%), deep vein thrombosis at a rate of 0.82 per 1.000 catheter days (n = 15, 2.9%) and local inflammation at a rate of 1.26 per 1.000 catheter days (n = 23, 4.4%). Only immunotherapy could be identified as an independent risk factor for complications (OR 5.6; 95% CI [2.4; 13.1]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using PICC in outpatients is not associated with an elevated risk of complications. Particular attention should be payed to early identification of PICC associated bloodstream infections. Immunotherapy is an independent risk factor for local skin complication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7447660/ /pubmed/31970514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mielke, Dorothea Wittig, Andrea Teichgräber, Ulf Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
title | Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
title_full | Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
title_fullStr | Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
title_short | Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
title_sort | peripherally inserted central venous catheter (picc) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mielkedorothea peripherallyinsertedcentralvenouscatheterpiccinoutpatientandinpatientoncologicaltreatment AT wittigandrea peripherallyinsertedcentralvenouscatheterpiccinoutpatientandinpatientoncologicaltreatment AT teichgraberulf peripherallyinsertedcentralvenouscatheterpiccinoutpatientandinpatientoncologicaltreatment |