Cargando…

Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production

Sustainability assessment using a life‐cycle approach is indispensable to contemporary bioprocess development. This assessment is particularly important for early‐stage bioprocess development. As early‐stage investigations of bioprocesses involve the evaluation of their ecological and socioeconomic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Mi‐Yong, Kohlheb, Norbert, Hunger, Steffi, Eschrich, Sandra, Müller, Roland, Aurich, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800198
_version_ 1783574381927071744
author Becker, Mi‐Yong
Kohlheb, Norbert
Hunger, Steffi
Eschrich, Sandra
Müller, Roland
Aurich, Andreas
author_facet Becker, Mi‐Yong
Kohlheb, Norbert
Hunger, Steffi
Eschrich, Sandra
Müller, Roland
Aurich, Andreas
author_sort Becker, Mi‐Yong
collection PubMed
description Sustainability assessment using a life‐cycle approach is indispensable to contemporary bioprocess development. This assessment is particularly important for early‐stage bioprocess development. As early‐stage investigations of bioprocesses involve the evaluation of their ecological and socioeconomic effects, they can be adjusted more effectively and improved towards sustainability, thereby reducing environmental risk and production costs. Early‐stage sustainability assessment is an important precautionary practice and, despite limited data, a unique opportunity to determine the primary impacts of bioprocess development. To this end, a simple and robust method was applied based on the standardized life‐cycle sustainability assessment methodology and commercially available datasets. In our study, we elaborated on the yeast‐based citric acid production process with Yarrowia lipolytica assessing 11 different substrates in different process modes. The focus of our analysis comprised both cultivation and down‐stream processing. According to our results, the repeated batch raw glycerol based bioprocess alternative showed the best environmental performance. The second‐ and third‐best options were also glycerol‐based. The least sustainable processes were those using molasses, chemically produced ethanol, and soy bean oil. The aggregated results of environmental, economic, and social impacts display waste frying oil as the best‐ranked alternative. The bioprocess with sunflower oil in the batch mode ranked second. The least favorable alternatives were the chemically produced ethanol‐, soy oil‐, refined glycerol‐, and molasses‐based citric acid production processes. The scenario analysis demonstrated that the environmental impact of nutrients and wastewater treatment is negligible, but energy demand of cultivation and down‐stream processing dominated the production process. However, without energy demand the omission of neutralizers almost halves the total impact, and neglecting pasteurization also considerably decreases the environmental impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7447866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74478662020-08-31 Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production Becker, Mi‐Yong Kohlheb, Norbert Hunger, Steffi Eschrich, Sandra Müller, Roland Aurich, Andreas Eng Life Sci Research Articles Sustainability assessment using a life‐cycle approach is indispensable to contemporary bioprocess development. This assessment is particularly important for early‐stage bioprocess development. As early‐stage investigations of bioprocesses involve the evaluation of their ecological and socioeconomic effects, they can be adjusted more effectively and improved towards sustainability, thereby reducing environmental risk and production costs. Early‐stage sustainability assessment is an important precautionary practice and, despite limited data, a unique opportunity to determine the primary impacts of bioprocess development. To this end, a simple and robust method was applied based on the standardized life‐cycle sustainability assessment methodology and commercially available datasets. In our study, we elaborated on the yeast‐based citric acid production process with Yarrowia lipolytica assessing 11 different substrates in different process modes. The focus of our analysis comprised both cultivation and down‐stream processing. According to our results, the repeated batch raw glycerol based bioprocess alternative showed the best environmental performance. The second‐ and third‐best options were also glycerol‐based. The least sustainable processes were those using molasses, chemically produced ethanol, and soy bean oil. The aggregated results of environmental, economic, and social impacts display waste frying oil as the best‐ranked alternative. The bioprocess with sunflower oil in the batch mode ranked second. The least favorable alternatives were the chemically produced ethanol‐, soy oil‐, refined glycerol‐, and molasses‐based citric acid production processes. The scenario analysis demonstrated that the environmental impact of nutrients and wastewater treatment is negligible, but energy demand of cultivation and down‐stream processing dominated the production process. However, without energy demand the omission of neutralizers almost halves the total impact, and neglecting pasteurization also considerably decreases the environmental impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7447866/ /pubmed/32874173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800198 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Engineering in Life Sciences published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Becker, Mi‐Yong
Kohlheb, Norbert
Hunger, Steffi
Eschrich, Sandra
Müller, Roland
Aurich, Andreas
Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
title Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
title_full Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
title_fullStr Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
title_full_unstemmed Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
title_short Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
title_sort early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: a case study of citric acid production
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800198
work_keys_str_mv AT beckermiyong earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction
AT kohlhebnorbert earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction
AT hungersteffi earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction
AT eschrichsandra earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction
AT mullerroland earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction
AT aurichandreas earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction