Cargando…
Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production
Sustainability assessment using a life‐cycle approach is indispensable to contemporary bioprocess development. This assessment is particularly important for early‐stage bioprocess development. As early‐stage investigations of bioprocesses involve the evaluation of their ecological and socioeconomic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800198 |
_version_ | 1783574381927071744 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Mi‐Yong Kohlheb, Norbert Hunger, Steffi Eschrich, Sandra Müller, Roland Aurich, Andreas |
author_facet | Becker, Mi‐Yong Kohlheb, Norbert Hunger, Steffi Eschrich, Sandra Müller, Roland Aurich, Andreas |
author_sort | Becker, Mi‐Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sustainability assessment using a life‐cycle approach is indispensable to contemporary bioprocess development. This assessment is particularly important for early‐stage bioprocess development. As early‐stage investigations of bioprocesses involve the evaluation of their ecological and socioeconomic effects, they can be adjusted more effectively and improved towards sustainability, thereby reducing environmental risk and production costs. Early‐stage sustainability assessment is an important precautionary practice and, despite limited data, a unique opportunity to determine the primary impacts of bioprocess development. To this end, a simple and robust method was applied based on the standardized life‐cycle sustainability assessment methodology and commercially available datasets. In our study, we elaborated on the yeast‐based citric acid production process with Yarrowia lipolytica assessing 11 different substrates in different process modes. The focus of our analysis comprised both cultivation and down‐stream processing. According to our results, the repeated batch raw glycerol based bioprocess alternative showed the best environmental performance. The second‐ and third‐best options were also glycerol‐based. The least sustainable processes were those using molasses, chemically produced ethanol, and soy bean oil. The aggregated results of environmental, economic, and social impacts display waste frying oil as the best‐ranked alternative. The bioprocess with sunflower oil in the batch mode ranked second. The least favorable alternatives were the chemically produced ethanol‐, soy oil‐, refined glycerol‐, and molasses‐based citric acid production processes. The scenario analysis demonstrated that the environmental impact of nutrients and wastewater treatment is negligible, but energy demand of cultivation and down‐stream processing dominated the production process. However, without energy demand the omission of neutralizers almost halves the total impact, and neglecting pasteurization also considerably decreases the environmental impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7447866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74478662020-08-31 Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production Becker, Mi‐Yong Kohlheb, Norbert Hunger, Steffi Eschrich, Sandra Müller, Roland Aurich, Andreas Eng Life Sci Research Articles Sustainability assessment using a life‐cycle approach is indispensable to contemporary bioprocess development. This assessment is particularly important for early‐stage bioprocess development. As early‐stage investigations of bioprocesses involve the evaluation of their ecological and socioeconomic effects, they can be adjusted more effectively and improved towards sustainability, thereby reducing environmental risk and production costs. Early‐stage sustainability assessment is an important precautionary practice and, despite limited data, a unique opportunity to determine the primary impacts of bioprocess development. To this end, a simple and robust method was applied based on the standardized life‐cycle sustainability assessment methodology and commercially available datasets. In our study, we elaborated on the yeast‐based citric acid production process with Yarrowia lipolytica assessing 11 different substrates in different process modes. The focus of our analysis comprised both cultivation and down‐stream processing. According to our results, the repeated batch raw glycerol based bioprocess alternative showed the best environmental performance. The second‐ and third‐best options were also glycerol‐based. The least sustainable processes were those using molasses, chemically produced ethanol, and soy bean oil. The aggregated results of environmental, economic, and social impacts display waste frying oil as the best‐ranked alternative. The bioprocess with sunflower oil in the batch mode ranked second. The least favorable alternatives were the chemically produced ethanol‐, soy oil‐, refined glycerol‐, and molasses‐based citric acid production processes. The scenario analysis demonstrated that the environmental impact of nutrients and wastewater treatment is negligible, but energy demand of cultivation and down‐stream processing dominated the production process. However, without energy demand the omission of neutralizers almost halves the total impact, and neglecting pasteurization also considerably decreases the environmental impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7447866/ /pubmed/32874173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800198 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Engineering in Life Sciences published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Becker, Mi‐Yong Kohlheb, Norbert Hunger, Steffi Eschrich, Sandra Müller, Roland Aurich, Andreas Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production |
title | Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production |
title_full | Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production |
title_fullStr | Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production |
title_full_unstemmed | Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production |
title_short | Early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: A case study of citric acid production |
title_sort | early‐stage sustainability assessment of biotechnological processes: a case study of citric acid production |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckermiyong earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction AT kohlhebnorbert earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction AT hungersteffi earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction AT eschrichsandra earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction AT mullerroland earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction AT aurichandreas earlystagesustainabilityassessmentofbiotechnologicalprocessesacasestudyofcitricacidproduction |