Cargando…
Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991 |
_version_ | 1783574388001472512 |
---|---|
author | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Marguerita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Brüschweiler, Beat Leonards, Pim Rose, Martin Binaglia, Marco Horváth, Zsuzsanna Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Nielsen, Elsa |
author_facet | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Marguerita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Brüschweiler, Beat Leonards, Pim Rose, Martin Binaglia, Marco Horváth, Zsuzsanna Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Nielsen, Elsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL (10) of 2.3 mg/kg bw per day for increased incidence of nephritis in male rats, and of 36 mg/kg bw per day for increased relative kidney weights in male and female rats for SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively. For LCCPs, a reference point relevant for humans could not be identified. Due to the limitations in the toxicokinetic and toxicological database, the Panel concluded that derivation of a health‐based guidance value was not appropriate. Only limited data on the occurrence of SCCPs and MCCPs in some fish species were submitted to EFSA. No data were submitted for LCCPs. Thus, a robust exposure assessment and consequently a complete risk characterisation could not be performed. A preliminary risk characterisation based only on the consumption of fish was performed, and the calculated margins of exposure suggested no health concern for this limited scenario. The Panel noted that dietary exposure will be higher due to the contribution of CPs from other foods. The Panel was not able to identify reference points for farm animals, horses and companion animals. No occurrence data for feed were submitted to EFSA. Therefore, no risk characterisation could be performed for any of these animal species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7447893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74478932020-08-31 Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Marguerita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Brüschweiler, Beat Leonards, Pim Rose, Martin Binaglia, Marco Horváth, Zsuzsanna Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Nielsen, Elsa EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL (10) of 2.3 mg/kg bw per day for increased incidence of nephritis in male rats, and of 36 mg/kg bw per day for increased relative kidney weights in male and female rats for SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively. For LCCPs, a reference point relevant for humans could not be identified. Due to the limitations in the toxicokinetic and toxicological database, the Panel concluded that derivation of a health‐based guidance value was not appropriate. Only limited data on the occurrence of SCCPs and MCCPs in some fish species were submitted to EFSA. No data were submitted for LCCPs. Thus, a robust exposure assessment and consequently a complete risk characterisation could not be performed. A preliminary risk characterisation based only on the consumption of fish was performed, and the calculated margins of exposure suggested no health concern for this limited scenario. The Panel noted that dietary exposure will be higher due to the contribution of CPs from other foods. The Panel was not able to identify reference points for farm animals, horses and companion animals. No occurrence data for feed were submitted to EFSA. Therefore, no risk characterisation could be performed for any of these animal species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7447893/ /pubmed/32874241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Marguerita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Brüschweiler, Beat Leonards, Pim Rose, Martin Binaglia, Marco Horváth, Zsuzsanna Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Nielsen, Elsa Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
title | Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
title_full | Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
title_fullStr | Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
title_short | Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
title_sort | risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT schrenkdieter riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT bignamimarguerita riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT bodinlaurent riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT chipmanjameskevin riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT delmazojesus riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT graslkrauppbettina riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT hogstrandchrister riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT leblancjeancharles riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT nebbiacarlostefano riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT ntzanievangelia riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT petersenannette riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT sandsalomon riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT schwerdtletanja riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT vleminckxchristiane riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT wallaceheather riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT bruschweilerbeat riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT leonardspim riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT rosemartin riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT binagliamarco riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT horvathzsuzsanna riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT ramosbordajandiluisa riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood AT nielsenelsa riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood |