Cargando…

Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food

The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schrenk, Dieter, Bignami, Marguerita, Bodin, Laurent, Chipman, James Kevin, del Mazo, Jesús, Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina, Hogstrand, Christer, Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron), Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Nebbia, Carlo Stefano, Ntzani, Evangelia, Petersen, Annette, Sand, Salomon, Schwerdtle, Tanja, Vleminckx, Christiane, Wallace, Heather, Brüschweiler, Beat, Leonards, Pim, Rose, Martin, Binaglia, Marco, Horváth, Zsuzsanna, Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa, Nielsen, Elsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874241
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991
_version_ 1783574388001472512
author Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Marguerita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Brüschweiler, Beat
Leonards, Pim
Rose, Martin
Binaglia, Marco
Horváth, Zsuzsanna
Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa
Nielsen, Elsa
author_facet Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Marguerita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Brüschweiler, Beat
Leonards, Pim
Rose, Martin
Binaglia, Marco
Horváth, Zsuzsanna
Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa
Nielsen, Elsa
collection PubMed
description The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL (10) of 2.3 mg/kg bw per day for increased incidence of nephritis in male rats, and of 36 mg/kg bw per day for increased relative kidney weights in male and female rats for SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively. For LCCPs, a reference point relevant for humans could not be identified. Due to the limitations in the toxicokinetic and toxicological database, the Panel concluded that derivation of a health‐based guidance value was not appropriate. Only limited data on the occurrence of SCCPs and MCCPs in some fish species were submitted to EFSA. No data were submitted for LCCPs. Thus, a robust exposure assessment and consequently a complete risk characterisation could not be performed. A preliminary risk characterisation based only on the consumption of fish was performed, and the calculated margins of exposure suggested no health concern for this limited scenario. The Panel noted that dietary exposure will be higher due to the contribution of CPs from other foods. The Panel was not able to identify reference points for farm animals, horses and companion animals. No occurrence data for feed were submitted to EFSA. Therefore, no risk characterisation could be performed for any of these animal species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7447893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74478932020-08-31 Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Marguerita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hogstrand, Christer Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Brüschweiler, Beat Leonards, Pim Rose, Martin Binaglia, Marco Horváth, Zsuzsanna Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa Nielsen, Elsa EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL (10) of 2.3 mg/kg bw per day for increased incidence of nephritis in male rats, and of 36 mg/kg bw per day for increased relative kidney weights in male and female rats for SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively. For LCCPs, a reference point relevant for humans could not be identified. Due to the limitations in the toxicokinetic and toxicological database, the Panel concluded that derivation of a health‐based guidance value was not appropriate. Only limited data on the occurrence of SCCPs and MCCPs in some fish species were submitted to EFSA. No data were submitted for LCCPs. Thus, a robust exposure assessment and consequently a complete risk characterisation could not be performed. A preliminary risk characterisation based only on the consumption of fish was performed, and the calculated margins of exposure suggested no health concern for this limited scenario. The Panel noted that dietary exposure will be higher due to the contribution of CPs from other foods. The Panel was not able to identify reference points for farm animals, horses and companion animals. No occurrence data for feed were submitted to EFSA. Therefore, no risk characterisation could be performed for any of these animal species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7447893/ /pubmed/32874241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Marguerita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Brüschweiler, Beat
Leonards, Pim
Rose, Martin
Binaglia, Marco
Horváth, Zsuzsanna
Ramos Bordajandi, Luisa
Nielsen, Elsa
Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
title Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
title_full Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
title_fullStr Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
title_short Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
title_sort risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874241
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991
work_keys_str_mv AT riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT schrenkdieter riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT bignamimarguerita riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT bodinlaurent riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT chipmanjameskevin riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT delmazojesus riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT graslkrauppbettina riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT hogstrandchrister riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT leblancjeancharles riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT nebbiacarlostefano riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT ntzanievangelia riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT petersenannette riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT sandsalomon riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT schwerdtletanja riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT vleminckxchristiane riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT wallaceheather riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT bruschweilerbeat riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT leonardspim riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT rosemartin riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT binagliamarco riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT horvathzsuzsanna riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT ramosbordajandiluisa riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood
AT nielsenelsa riskassessmentofchlorinatedparaffinsinfeedandfood