Cargando…
Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
Ascorbyl palmitate (E 304(i)) was re‐evaluated in 2015 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304(i)) for its...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6153 |
_version_ | 1783574410544807936 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Rincon, Ana Maria Gundert‐Remy, Ursula |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Rincon, Ana Maria Gundert‐Remy, Ursula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ascorbyl palmitate (E 304(i)) was re‐evaluated in 2015 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304(i)) for its uses as food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories 13.1.1 (Infant formulae) and 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and as carry over in line with Annex III, Part 5 Section B to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested business operators to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. On the basis of the data submitted by interested business operators and the considerations from the Panel, a revision of the existing EU specifications for ascorbyl palmitate (E 304 (i)) has been recommended. Based on in vitro data, the FAF Panel assumed that ascorbyl palmitate fully hydrolyses pre‐systemically to ascorbic acid and palmitate. The Panel concluded that the intake of both metabolites, at the MPLs for ascorbyl palmitate as a food additive in infant formula belonging to FC 13.1.1 or in food for special medical purposes belonging to FC 13.1.5.1, does not raise health concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7448004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74480042020-08-31 Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Rincon, Ana Maria Gundert‐Remy, Ursula EFSA J Scientific Opinion Ascorbyl palmitate (E 304(i)) was re‐evaluated in 2015 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As a follow‐up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304(i)) for its uses as food additive in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories 13.1.1 (Infant formulae) and 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and as carry over in line with Annex III, Part 5 Section B to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. In addition, the FAF Panel was requested to address the issues already identified during the re‐evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested business operators to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. On the basis of the data submitted by interested business operators and the considerations from the Panel, a revision of the existing EU specifications for ascorbyl palmitate (E 304 (i)) has been recommended. Based on in vitro data, the FAF Panel assumed that ascorbyl palmitate fully hydrolyses pre‐systemically to ascorbic acid and palmitate. The Panel concluded that the intake of both metabolites, at the MPLs for ascorbyl palmitate as a food additive in infant formula belonging to FC 13.1.1 or in food for special medical purposes belonging to FC 13.1.5.1, does not raise health concerns. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7448004/ /pubmed/32874329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6153 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Dusemund, Birgit Mortensen, Alicja Turck, Dominique Barmaz, Stefania Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Rincon, Ana Maria Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_full | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_fullStr | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_short | Opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (E 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
title_sort | opinion on the re‐evaluation of ascorbyl palmitate (e 304i) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of its re‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT younesmaged opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT aquilinagabriele opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT castlelaurence opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT engelkarlheinz opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT fowlerpaul opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT frutosfernandezmariajose opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT furstpeter opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT gurtlerrainer opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT husøytrine opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT mancomelania opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT menneswim opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT moldeuspeter opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT passamontisabina opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT shahromina opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT waalkensberendsenine opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT wolfledetlef opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT wrightmatthew opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT dusemundbirgit opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT mortensenalicja opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT turckdominique opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT barmazstefania opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT smeraldicamilla opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT tardalexandra opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT vianellogiorgia opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT rinconanamaria opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups AT gundertremyursula opiniononthereevaluationofascorbylpalmitatee304iasafoodadditiveinfoodsforinfantsbelow16weeksofageandthefollowupofitsreevaluationasafoodadditiveforusesinfoodsforallpopulationgroups |