Cargando…
Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019)
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a safety pre‐assessment within EFSA for microorganisms. Strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units (TUs) still require an assessment based on a specific data package, but QPS status facilitates fast track evaluation. QPS TUs are unambi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874212 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966 |
_version_ | 1783574420178075648 |
---|---|
author | Koutsoumanis, Kostas Allende, Ana Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Maradona, Miguel Prieto Querol, Amparo Suarez, Juan Evaristo Sundh, Ingvar Vlak, Just Barizzone, Fulvio Correia, Sandra Herman, Lieve |
author_facet | Koutsoumanis, Kostas Allende, Ana Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Maradona, Miguel Prieto Querol, Amparo Suarez, Juan Evaristo Sundh, Ingvar Vlak, Just Barizzone, Fulvio Correia, Sandra Herman, Lieve |
collection | PubMed |
description | The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a safety pre‐assessment within EFSA for microorganisms. Strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units (TUs) still require an assessment based on a specific data package, but QPS status facilitates fast track evaluation. QPS TUs are unambiguously defined biological agents assessed for the body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Safety concerns are, where possible, to be confirmed at strain or product level, and reflected as ‘qualifications’. Qualifications need to be evaluated at strain level by the respective EFSA units. The lowest QPS TU is the species level for bacteria, yeasts and protists/algae, and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes if the recipient strain qualifies for the QPS status, and if the genetic modification does not indicate a concern. Based on the actual body of knowledge and/or an ambiguous taxonomic position, the following TUs were excluded from the QPS assessment: filamentous fungi, oomycetes, streptomycetes, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli and bacteriophages. The list of QPS‐recommended biological agents was reviewed and updated in the current opinion and therefore now becomes the valid list. For this update, reports on the safety of previously assessed microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts and viruses (the latter only when used for plant protection purposes) were reviewed, following an Extensive Literature Search strategy. All TUs previously recommended for 2016 QPS list had their status reconfirmed as well as their qualifications. The TUs related to the new notifications received since the 2016 QPS opinion was periodically evaluated for QPS status in the Statements of the BIOHAZ Panel, and the QPS list was also periodically updated. In total, 14 new TUs received a QPS status between 2017 and 2019: three yeasts, eight bacteria and three algae/protists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7448045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74480452020-08-31 Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) Koutsoumanis, Kostas Allende, Ana Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Maradona, Miguel Prieto Querol, Amparo Suarez, Juan Evaristo Sundh, Ingvar Vlak, Just Barizzone, Fulvio Correia, Sandra Herman, Lieve EFSA J Scientific Opinion The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) was developed to provide a safety pre‐assessment within EFSA for microorganisms. Strains belonging to QPS taxonomic units (TUs) still require an assessment based on a specific data package, but QPS status facilitates fast track evaluation. QPS TUs are unambiguously defined biological agents assessed for the body of knowledge, their safety and their end use. Safety concerns are, where possible, to be confirmed at strain or product level, and reflected as ‘qualifications’. Qualifications need to be evaluated at strain level by the respective EFSA units. The lowest QPS TU is the species level for bacteria, yeasts and protists/algae, and the family for viruses. The QPS concept is also applicable to genetically modified microorganisms used for production purposes if the recipient strain qualifies for the QPS status, and if the genetic modification does not indicate a concern. Based on the actual body of knowledge and/or an ambiguous taxonomic position, the following TUs were excluded from the QPS assessment: filamentous fungi, oomycetes, streptomycetes, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli and bacteriophages. The list of QPS‐recommended biological agents was reviewed and updated in the current opinion and therefore now becomes the valid list. For this update, reports on the safety of previously assessed microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts and viruses (the latter only when used for plant protection purposes) were reviewed, following an Extensive Literature Search strategy. All TUs previously recommended for 2016 QPS list had their status reconfirmed as well as their qualifications. The TUs related to the new notifications received since the 2016 QPS opinion was periodically evaluated for QPS status in the Statements of the BIOHAZ Panel, and the QPS list was also periodically updated. In total, 14 new TUs received a QPS status between 2017 and 2019: three yeasts, eight bacteria and three algae/protists. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7448045/ /pubmed/32874212 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Koutsoumanis, Kostas Allende, Ana Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Maradona, Miguel Prieto Querol, Amparo Suarez, Juan Evaristo Sundh, Ingvar Vlak, Just Barizzone, Fulvio Correia, Sandra Herman, Lieve Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) |
title | Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) |
title_full | Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) |
title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) |
title_short | Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017–2019) |
title_sort | scientific opinion on the update of the list of qps‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to efsa (2017–2019) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874212 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT koutsoumaniskostas scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT allendeana scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT alvarezordonezavelino scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT boltondeclan scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT bovercidsara scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT chemalymarianne scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT daviesrobert scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT decesarealessandra scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT hilbertfriederike scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT lindqvistroland scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT nautamaarten scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT peixeluisa scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT rugiuseppe scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT simmonsmarion scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT skandamispanagiotis scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT suffredinielisabetta scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT cocconcellipiersandro scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT fernandezescamezpablosalvador scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT maradonamiguelprieto scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT querolamparo scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT suarezjuanevaristo scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT sundhingvar scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT vlakjust scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT barizzonefulvio scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT correiasandra scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 AT hermanlieve scientificopinionontheupdateofthelistofqpsrecommendedbiologicalagentsintentionallyaddedtofoodorfeedasnotifiedtoefsa20172019 |