Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminiu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika, Wölfle, Detlef, Wright, Matthew, Boon, Polly, Tobback, Paul, Rincon, Ana Maria, Tard, Alexandra, Moldeus, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874328
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152
_version_ 1783574421145911296
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Tobback, Paul
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Moldeus, Peter
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Tobback, Paul
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Moldeus, Peter
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminium‐containing food additives a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7 mg aluminium/kg body weight (bw). In 2008, EFSA established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 1 mg aluminium/kg bw per week. Sodium aluminium silicate was shown in rats to be absorbed to a limited extent at 0.12 ± 0.011%. The Panel considered that potassium aluminium silicate would be absorbed and become systemically available similarly to sodium aluminium silicate. No information on the physicochemical characterisation of sodium aluminium silicate and potassium aluminium silicate when used as food additives has been submitted and only very limited toxicological data were available for sodium aluminium silicate. Exposure to E 554 was calculated based on the reported use levels in food supplements. Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium. Based on the data provided by interested business operators, the Panel considered that E 555 is not being used as a carrier, but as an inseparable component of ‘potassium aluminium silicate‐based pearlescent pigments’. The Panel calculated the regulatory maximum exposure to E 555 as a carrier for titanium dioxide (E 171) and iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172). Exposure to aluminium from this single use at the maximum permitted level could theoretically far exceed the TWI. Considering that only very limited toxicological data and insufficient information on the physicochemical characterisation of both food additives were available, the Panel concluded that the safety of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) could not be assessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7448050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74480502020-08-31 Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminium‐containing food additives a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7 mg aluminium/kg body weight (bw). In 2008, EFSA established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 1 mg aluminium/kg bw per week. Sodium aluminium silicate was shown in rats to be absorbed to a limited extent at 0.12 ± 0.011%. The Panel considered that potassium aluminium silicate would be absorbed and become systemically available similarly to sodium aluminium silicate. No information on the physicochemical characterisation of sodium aluminium silicate and potassium aluminium silicate when used as food additives has been submitted and only very limited toxicological data were available for sodium aluminium silicate. Exposure to E 554 was calculated based on the reported use levels in food supplements. Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium. Based on the data provided by interested business operators, the Panel considered that E 555 is not being used as a carrier, but as an inseparable component of ‘potassium aluminium silicate‐based pearlescent pigments’. The Panel calculated the regulatory maximum exposure to E 555 as a carrier for titanium dioxide (E 171) and iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172). Exposure to aluminium from this single use at the maximum permitted level could theoretically far exceed the TWI. Considering that only very limited toxicological data and insufficient information on the physicochemical characterisation of both food additives were available, the Panel concluded that the safety of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) could not be assessed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7448050/ /pubmed/32874328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Tobback, Paul
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Moldeus, Peter
Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
title Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
title_full Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
title_short Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
title_sort re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (e 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (e 555) as food additives
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874328
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT younesmaged reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT castlelaurence reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT fowlerpaul reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT furstpeter reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT husøytrine reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT mancomelania reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT menneswim reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT passamontisabina reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT shahromina reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT waalkensberendsendinahendrika reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT boonpolly reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives