Cargando…
Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives
The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminiu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152 |
_version_ | 1783574421145911296 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminium‐containing food additives a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7 mg aluminium/kg body weight (bw). In 2008, EFSA established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 1 mg aluminium/kg bw per week. Sodium aluminium silicate was shown in rats to be absorbed to a limited extent at 0.12 ± 0.011%. The Panel considered that potassium aluminium silicate would be absorbed and become systemically available similarly to sodium aluminium silicate. No information on the physicochemical characterisation of sodium aluminium silicate and potassium aluminium silicate when used as food additives has been submitted and only very limited toxicological data were available for sodium aluminium silicate. Exposure to E 554 was calculated based on the reported use levels in food supplements. Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium. Based on the data provided by interested business operators, the Panel considered that E 555 is not being used as a carrier, but as an inseparable component of ‘potassium aluminium silicate‐based pearlescent pigments’. The Panel calculated the regulatory maximum exposure to E 555 as a carrier for titanium dioxide (E 171) and iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172). Exposure to aluminium from this single use at the maximum permitted level could theoretically far exceed the TWI. Considering that only very limited toxicological data and insufficient information on the physicochemical characterisation of both food additives were available, the Panel concluded that the safety of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) could not be assessed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7448050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74480502020-08-31 Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of Sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives. The Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) assigned these food additives together with other aluminium‐containing food additives a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7 mg aluminium/kg body weight (bw). In 2008, EFSA established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 1 mg aluminium/kg bw per week. Sodium aluminium silicate was shown in rats to be absorbed to a limited extent at 0.12 ± 0.011%. The Panel considered that potassium aluminium silicate would be absorbed and become systemically available similarly to sodium aluminium silicate. No information on the physicochemical characterisation of sodium aluminium silicate and potassium aluminium silicate when used as food additives has been submitted and only very limited toxicological data were available for sodium aluminium silicate. Exposure to E 554 was calculated based on the reported use levels in food supplements. Exposure to aluminium from this use of E 554 was calculated to exceed the TWI for aluminium. Based on the data provided by interested business operators, the Panel considered that E 555 is not being used as a carrier, but as an inseparable component of ‘potassium aluminium silicate‐based pearlescent pigments’. The Panel calculated the regulatory maximum exposure to E 555 as a carrier for titanium dioxide (E 171) and iron oxides and hydroxides (E 172). Exposure to aluminium from this single use at the maximum permitted level could theoretically far exceed the TWI. Considering that only very limited toxicological data and insufficient information on the physicochemical characterisation of both food additives were available, the Panel concluded that the safety of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) could not be assessed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7448050/ /pubmed/32874328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Moldeus, Peter Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives |
title | Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives |
title_full | Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives |
title_fullStr | Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives |
title_full_unstemmed | Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives |
title_short | Re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (E 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (E 555) as food additives |
title_sort | re‐evaluation of sodium aluminium silicate (e 554) and potassium aluminium silicate (e 555) as food additives |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874328 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT younesmaged reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT castlelaurence reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT fowlerpaul reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT furstpeter reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT husøytrine reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT mancomelania reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT menneswim reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT passamontisabina reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT shahromina reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT waalkensberendsendinahendrika reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT boonpolly reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT tardalexandra reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofsodiumaluminiumsilicatee554andpotassiumaluminiumsilicatee555asfoodadditives |