Cargando…

Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)

An alternative method for the production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products was assessed. The method is based on a pre‐cleaning process, acidic esterification/transesterification of tallow using 1.5% methanesulfonic acid w/w; 140°C; 5.5 bar absolute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos, Allende, Ana, Bolton, Declan, Bover‐Cid, Sara, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, De Cesare, Alessandra, Herman, Lieve, Hilbert, Friederike, Lindqvist, Roland, Nauta, Maarten, Peixe, Luisa, Ru, Giuseppe, Simmons, Marion, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Suffredini, Elisabetta, Andréoletti, Olivier, Escámez, Pablo Fernández, Griffin, John, Spiropoulos, John, Ashe, Sean, Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel, Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6089
_version_ 1783574422574071808
author Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan
Bover‐Cid, Sara
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
De Cesare, Alessandra
Herman, Lieve
Hilbert, Friederike
Lindqvist, Roland
Nauta, Maarten
Peixe, Luisa
Ru, Giuseppe
Simmons, Marion
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Suffredini, Elisabetta
Andréoletti, Olivier
Escámez, Pablo Fernández
Griffin, John
Spiropoulos, John
Ashe, Sean
Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel
Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
author_facet Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan
Bover‐Cid, Sara
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
De Cesare, Alessandra
Herman, Lieve
Hilbert, Friederike
Lindqvist, Roland
Nauta, Maarten
Peixe, Luisa
Ru, Giuseppe
Simmons, Marion
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Suffredini, Elisabetta
Andréoletti, Olivier
Escámez, Pablo Fernández
Griffin, John
Spiropoulos, John
Ashe, Sean
Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel
Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
collection PubMed
description An alternative method for the production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products was assessed. The method is based on a pre‐cleaning process, acidic esterification/transesterification of tallow using 1.5% methanesulfonic acid w/w; 140°C; 5.5 bar absolute pressure (bara); 4 h, followed by fractional distillation. The application focuses on the capacity of the alternative method to inactivate prions. Given the limitations that biodiesel presents for direct measurement of prion infectivity, the BIOHAZ Panel considered, based on the outcome of previous EFSA Opinions and current expert evaluation, that a reduction of 6 log(10) in detectable PrP(S) (c) signal would be necessary to consider the process at least equivalent to previously approved methods for Category 1 animal by‐products. This is in addition to the inactivation achieved by the pressure sterilisation method applied before the application of any biodiesel production method. Experimental data were provided via ad hoc studies commissioned to quantify the reduction in detectable PrP(S) (c) in material spiked with scrapie hamster strain 263K, as measured by western blot, for the first two steps, with distillation assumed to provide at least an additional 3 log(10) reduction, based on published data. Despite the intrinsic methodological caveats of the detection of PrP(S) (c) in laboratory studies, the BIOHAZ Panel considers that the alternative method, including the final fractional distillation, is capable of achieving the required 6 log(10) reduction of the strain 263K PrP(S) (c) signal. Therefore, the method under assessment can be considered at least equivalent to the processing methods previously approved for the production of biodiesel from all categories of animal by‐product raw materials. It is recommended to check the feasibility of the proposed HACCP plan by recording the main processing parameters for a certain time period under real industrial conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7448056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74480562020-08-31 Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins) Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Andréoletti, Olivier Escámez, Pablo Fernández Griffin, John Spiropoulos, John Ashe, Sean Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino EFSA J Scientific Opinion An alternative method for the production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products was assessed. The method is based on a pre‐cleaning process, acidic esterification/transesterification of tallow using 1.5% methanesulfonic acid w/w; 140°C; 5.5 bar absolute pressure (bara); 4 h, followed by fractional distillation. The application focuses on the capacity of the alternative method to inactivate prions. Given the limitations that biodiesel presents for direct measurement of prion infectivity, the BIOHAZ Panel considered, based on the outcome of previous EFSA Opinions and current expert evaluation, that a reduction of 6 log(10) in detectable PrP(S) (c) signal would be necessary to consider the process at least equivalent to previously approved methods for Category 1 animal by‐products. This is in addition to the inactivation achieved by the pressure sterilisation method applied before the application of any biodiesel production method. Experimental data were provided via ad hoc studies commissioned to quantify the reduction in detectable PrP(S) (c) in material spiked with scrapie hamster strain 263K, as measured by western blot, for the first two steps, with distillation assumed to provide at least an additional 3 log(10) reduction, based on published data. Despite the intrinsic methodological caveats of the detection of PrP(S) (c) in laboratory studies, the BIOHAZ Panel considers that the alternative method, including the final fractional distillation, is capable of achieving the required 6 log(10) reduction of the strain 263K PrP(S) (c) signal. Therefore, the method under assessment can be considered at least equivalent to the processing methods previously approved for the production of biodiesel from all categories of animal by‐product raw materials. It is recommended to check the feasibility of the proposed HACCP plan by recording the main processing parameters for a certain time period under real industrial conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7448056/ /pubmed/32874297 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6089 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan
Bover‐Cid, Sara
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
De Cesare, Alessandra
Herman, Lieve
Hilbert, Friederike
Lindqvist, Roland
Nauta, Maarten
Peixe, Luisa
Ru, Giuseppe
Simmons, Marion
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Suffredini, Elisabetta
Andréoletti, Olivier
Escámez, Pablo Fernández
Griffin, John
Spiropoulos, John
Ashe, Sean
Ortiz‐Peláez, Angel
Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino
Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)
title Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)
title_full Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)
title_fullStr Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)
title_short Evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from Category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by College Proteins)
title_sort evaluation of an alternative method for production of biodiesel from processed fats derived from category 1, 2 and 3 animal by‐products (submitted by college proteins)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6089
work_keys_str_mv AT evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT koutsoumaniskonstantinos evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT allendeana evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT boltondeclan evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT bovercidsara evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT chemalymarianne evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT daviesrobert evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT decesarealessandra evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT hermanlieve evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT hilbertfriederike evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT lindqvistroland evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT nautamaarten evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT peixeluisa evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT rugiuseppe evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT simmonsmarion evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT skandamispanagiotis evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT suffredinielisabetta evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT andreolettiolivier evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT escamezpablofernandez evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT griffinjohn evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT spiropoulosjohn evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT ashesean evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT ortizpelaezangel evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins
AT alvarezordonezavelino evaluationofanalternativemethodforproductionofbiodieselfromprocessedfatsderivedfromcategory12and3animalbyproductssubmittedbycollegeproteins