_version_ 1783574424661786624
author Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chiusolo, Arianna
Court Marques, Daniele
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Jose Oriol
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Sacchi, Angela
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Theobald, Anne
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
author_facet Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chiusolo, Arianna
Court Marques, Daniele
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Jose Oriol
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Sacchi, Angela
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Theobald, Anne
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
collection PubMed
description The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Germany, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Hungary, for the pesticide active substance beta‐cyfluthrin are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of beta‐cyfluthrin as an insecticide on beet, potato, wheat and greenhouse tomato. In addition, this conclusion also addresses the request received from the European Commission during the decision‐making phase following completion of the peer review with regard to the risk to non‐target arthropods. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7448066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74480662020-08-31 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Daniele Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Theobald, Anne Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Germany, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Hungary, for the pesticide active substance beta‐cyfluthrin are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of beta‐cyfluthrin as an insecticide on beet, potato, wheat and greenhouse tomato. In addition, this conclusion also addresses the request received from the European Commission during the decision‐making phase following completion of the peer review with regard to the risk to non‐target arthropods. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7448066/ /pubmed/32874272 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6058 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chiusolo, Arianna
Court Marques, Daniele
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Jose Oriol
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Sacchi, Angela
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Theobald, Anne
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
topic Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32874272
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6058
work_keys_str_mv AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT brancatoalba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT buralaszlo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT carrascocabreraluis peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT chiusoloarianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT courtmarquesdaniele peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT crivellentefederica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT egsmosemark peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT faitgabriella peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT grecoluna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT istacefrederique peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT jarrahsamira peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT leuschnerrenata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT lostiaalfonso peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT lythgochristopher peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT magransjoseoriol peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT mironileana peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT padovanilaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT parramortejuanmanuel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT pedersenragnor peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT reichhermine peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT sacchiangela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT santosmiguel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT serafimovarositsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT stanekalois peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT terronandrea peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT theobaldanne peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin
AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancebetacyfluthrin