Cargando…
Why ‘understanding’ of research may not be necessary for ethical emergency research
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are central to generating knowledge about effectiveness of interventions as well as risk, protective and prognostic factors related to diseases in emergency newborn care. Whether prospective participants understand the purpose of research, and what the...
Autor principal: | Kaye, Dan Kabonge |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-020-00090-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Lay persons’ perception of the requirements for research in emergency obstetric and newborn care
por: Kaye, Dan Kabonge
Publicado: (2021) -
The ethical justification for inclusion of neonates in pragmatic randomized clinical trials for emergency newborn care
por: Kaye, Dan Kabonge
Publicado: (2019) -
Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic procedures
por: Kaye, Dan Kabonge
Publicado: (2023) -
Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19
por: Kaye, Dan Kabonge
Publicado: (2022) -
Processes for Scientific and Ethical Approval of Research Proposals: Better Oversight May Be Necessary
por: Andrade, Chittaranjan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)