Cargando…
UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic and common condition with a rising prevalence, especially in the elderly. Morbidity and mortality rates in people with HF are similar to those with common forms of cancer. Clinical guidelines highlight the need for more detailed prognostic information to o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00081-4 |
_version_ | 1783574474644258816 |
---|---|
author | Vazquez-Montes, Maria D. L. A. Debray, Thomas P. A. Taylor, Kathryn S. Speich, Benjamin Jones, Nicholas Collins, Gary S. Hobbs, F. D. R. Richard Magriplis, Emmanuella Maruri-Aguilar, Hugo Moons, Karel G. M. Parissis, John Perera, Rafael Roberts, Nia Taylor, Clare J. Kadoglou, Nikolaos P. E. Trivella, Marialena |
author_facet | Vazquez-Montes, Maria D. L. A. Debray, Thomas P. A. Taylor, Kathryn S. Speich, Benjamin Jones, Nicholas Collins, Gary S. Hobbs, F. D. R. Richard Magriplis, Emmanuella Maruri-Aguilar, Hugo Moons, Karel G. M. Parissis, John Perera, Rafael Roberts, Nia Taylor, Clare J. Kadoglou, Nikolaos P. E. Trivella, Marialena |
author_sort | Vazquez-Montes, Maria D. L. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic and common condition with a rising prevalence, especially in the elderly. Morbidity and mortality rates in people with HF are similar to those with common forms of cancer. Clinical guidelines highlight the need for more detailed prognostic information to optimise treatment and care planning for people with HF. Besides proven prognostic biomarkers and numerous newly developed prognostic models for HF clinical outcomes, no risk stratification models have been adequately established. Through a number of linked systematic reviews, we aim to assess the quality of the existing models with biomarkers in HF and summarise the evidence they present. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and the prognostic studies database maintained by the Cochrane Prognosis Methods Group combining sensitive published search filters, with no language restriction, from 1990 onwards. Independent pairs of reviewers will screen and extract data. Eligible studies will be those developing, validating, or updating any prognostic model with biomarkers for clinical outcomes in adults with any type of HF. Data will be extracted using a piloted form that combines published good practice guidelines for critical appraisal, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of prediction modelling studies. Missing information on predictive performance measures will be sought by contacting authors or estimated from available information when possible. If sufficient high quality and homogeneous data are available, we will meta-analyse the predictive performance of identified models. Sources of between-study heterogeneity will be explored through meta-regression using pre-defined study-level covariates. Results will be reported narratively if study quality is deemed to be low or if the between-study heterogeneity is high. Sensitivity analyses for risk of bias impact will be performed. DISCUSSION: This project aims to appraise and summarise the methodological conduct and predictive performance of existing clinically homogeneous HF prognostic models in separate systematic reviews. Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42019086990 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7448313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74483132020-08-27 UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure Vazquez-Montes, Maria D. L. A. Debray, Thomas P. A. Taylor, Kathryn S. Speich, Benjamin Jones, Nicholas Collins, Gary S. Hobbs, F. D. R. Richard Magriplis, Emmanuella Maruri-Aguilar, Hugo Moons, Karel G. M. Parissis, John Perera, Rafael Roberts, Nia Taylor, Clare J. Kadoglou, Nikolaos P. E. Trivella, Marialena Diagn Progn Res Protocol BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic and common condition with a rising prevalence, especially in the elderly. Morbidity and mortality rates in people with HF are similar to those with common forms of cancer. Clinical guidelines highlight the need for more detailed prognostic information to optimise treatment and care planning for people with HF. Besides proven prognostic biomarkers and numerous newly developed prognostic models for HF clinical outcomes, no risk stratification models have been adequately established. Through a number of linked systematic reviews, we aim to assess the quality of the existing models with biomarkers in HF and summarise the evidence they present. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and the prognostic studies database maintained by the Cochrane Prognosis Methods Group combining sensitive published search filters, with no language restriction, from 1990 onwards. Independent pairs of reviewers will screen and extract data. Eligible studies will be those developing, validating, or updating any prognostic model with biomarkers for clinical outcomes in adults with any type of HF. Data will be extracted using a piloted form that combines published good practice guidelines for critical appraisal, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment of prediction modelling studies. Missing information on predictive performance measures will be sought by contacting authors or estimated from available information when possible. If sufficient high quality and homogeneous data are available, we will meta-analyse the predictive performance of identified models. Sources of between-study heterogeneity will be explored through meta-regression using pre-defined study-level covariates. Results will be reported narratively if study quality is deemed to be low or if the between-study heterogeneity is high. Sensitivity analyses for risk of bias impact will be performed. DISCUSSION: This project aims to appraise and summarise the methodological conduct and predictive performance of existing clinically homogeneous HF prognostic models in separate systematic reviews. Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42019086990 BioMed Central 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7448313/ /pubmed/32864468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00081-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Vazquez-Montes, Maria D. L. A. Debray, Thomas P. A. Taylor, Kathryn S. Speich, Benjamin Jones, Nicholas Collins, Gary S. Hobbs, F. D. R. Richard Magriplis, Emmanuella Maruri-Aguilar, Hugo Moons, Karel G. M. Parissis, John Perera, Rafael Roberts, Nia Taylor, Clare J. Kadoglou, Nikolaos P. E. Trivella, Marialena UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
title | UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
title_full | UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
title_fullStr | UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
title_full_unstemmed | UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
title_short | UMBRELLA protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
title_sort | umbrella protocol: systematic reviews of multivariable biomarker prognostic models developed to predict clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00081-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazquezmontesmariadla umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT debraythomaspa umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT taylorkathryns umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT speichbenjamin umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT jonesnicholas umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT collinsgarys umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT hobbsfdrrichard umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT magriplisemmanuella umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT maruriaguilarhugo umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT moonskarelgm umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT parissisjohn umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT pererarafael umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT robertsnia umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT taylorclarej umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT kadoglounikolaospe umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT trivellamarialena umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure AT umbrellaprotocolsystematicreviewsofmultivariablebiomarkerprognosticmodelsdevelopedtopredictclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithheartfailure |