Cargando…

Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND: The haematoma block (HB) has been successfully used to minimise pain prior to otherwise painful closed reduction manoeuvres for distal radius fractures. However, the invasive manner of the procedure, which technically produces an open fracture, still raises the question, whether HBs incr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maleitzke, Tazio, Plachel, Fabian, Fleckenstein, Florian Nima, Wichlas, Florian, Tsitsilonis, Serafeim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01819-y
_version_ 1783574476841025536
author Maleitzke, Tazio
Plachel, Fabian
Fleckenstein, Florian Nima
Wichlas, Florian
Tsitsilonis, Serafeim
author_facet Maleitzke, Tazio
Plachel, Fabian
Fleckenstein, Florian Nima
Wichlas, Florian
Tsitsilonis, Serafeim
author_sort Maleitzke, Tazio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The haematoma block (HB) has been successfully used to minimise pain prior to otherwise painful closed reduction manoeuvres for distal radius fractures. However, the invasive manner of the procedure, which technically produces an open fracture, still raises the question, whether HBs increase the risk of infection compared to conventional intravenous analgesia (IA). The purpose of this study was to assess complication rates and safety of the HB procedure for the closed reduction of surgically treated distal radius fractures. METHODS: We included 176 distal radius fractures in 170 patients in a retrospective mono-centric study, who underwent closed reduction and casting followed by definitive surgical care over a period of two years. Patients either received a HB or IA before closed reduction and were evaluated for minor and major complications over a follow-up period of four years. RESULTS: Overall, 42 distal radius fractures were treated with a HB (23.9%) and 134 with IA (76.1%) before closed reduction. There were a single major (2.3%) and eight minor (19%) complications observed in the HB group compared to two major (1.4%) and 24 minor (17.9%) complications in the IA group. No significant differences were identified between the two groups. Sex and type of fracture had no effect on complication rates, however, younger patients experienced higher complication rates in comparison to older ones (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the apprehensions that clinicians may have of creating open fractures through HB procedures, are unnecessary and may be abandoned confidently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7448324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74483242020-08-27 Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures Maleitzke, Tazio Plachel, Fabian Fleckenstein, Florian Nima Wichlas, Florian Tsitsilonis, Serafeim J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The haematoma block (HB) has been successfully used to minimise pain prior to otherwise painful closed reduction manoeuvres for distal radius fractures. However, the invasive manner of the procedure, which technically produces an open fracture, still raises the question, whether HBs increase the risk of infection compared to conventional intravenous analgesia (IA). The purpose of this study was to assess complication rates and safety of the HB procedure for the closed reduction of surgically treated distal radius fractures. METHODS: We included 176 distal radius fractures in 170 patients in a retrospective mono-centric study, who underwent closed reduction and casting followed by definitive surgical care over a period of two years. Patients either received a HB or IA before closed reduction and were evaluated for minor and major complications over a follow-up period of four years. RESULTS: Overall, 42 distal radius fractures were treated with a HB (23.9%) and 134 with IA (76.1%) before closed reduction. There were a single major (2.3%) and eight minor (19%) complications observed in the HB group compared to two major (1.4%) and 24 minor (17.9%) complications in the IA group. No significant differences were identified between the two groups. Sex and type of fracture had no effect on complication rates, however, younger patients experienced higher complication rates in comparison to older ones (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the apprehensions that clinicians may have of creating open fractures through HB procedures, are unnecessary and may be abandoned confidently. BioMed Central 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7448324/ /pubmed/32843043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01819-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maleitzke, Tazio
Plachel, Fabian
Fleckenstein, Florian Nima
Wichlas, Florian
Tsitsilonis, Serafeim
Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
title Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
title_full Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
title_fullStr Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
title_full_unstemmed Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
title_short Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
title_sort haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01819-y
work_keys_str_mv AT maleitzketazio haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT plachelfabian haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT fleckensteinfloriannima haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT wichlasflorian haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT tsitsilonisserafeim haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures