Cargando…
Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures
BACKGROUND: The haematoma block (HB) has been successfully used to minimise pain prior to otherwise painful closed reduction manoeuvres for distal radius fractures. However, the invasive manner of the procedure, which technically produces an open fracture, still raises the question, whether HBs incr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01819-y |
_version_ | 1783574476841025536 |
---|---|
author | Maleitzke, Tazio Plachel, Fabian Fleckenstein, Florian Nima Wichlas, Florian Tsitsilonis, Serafeim |
author_facet | Maleitzke, Tazio Plachel, Fabian Fleckenstein, Florian Nima Wichlas, Florian Tsitsilonis, Serafeim |
author_sort | Maleitzke, Tazio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The haematoma block (HB) has been successfully used to minimise pain prior to otherwise painful closed reduction manoeuvres for distal radius fractures. However, the invasive manner of the procedure, which technically produces an open fracture, still raises the question, whether HBs increase the risk of infection compared to conventional intravenous analgesia (IA). The purpose of this study was to assess complication rates and safety of the HB procedure for the closed reduction of surgically treated distal radius fractures. METHODS: We included 176 distal radius fractures in 170 patients in a retrospective mono-centric study, who underwent closed reduction and casting followed by definitive surgical care over a period of two years. Patients either received a HB or IA before closed reduction and were evaluated for minor and major complications over a follow-up period of four years. RESULTS: Overall, 42 distal radius fractures were treated with a HB (23.9%) and 134 with IA (76.1%) before closed reduction. There were a single major (2.3%) and eight minor (19%) complications observed in the HB group compared to two major (1.4%) and 24 minor (17.9%) complications in the IA group. No significant differences were identified between the two groups. Sex and type of fracture had no effect on complication rates, however, younger patients experienced higher complication rates in comparison to older ones (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the apprehensions that clinicians may have of creating open fractures through HB procedures, are unnecessary and may be abandoned confidently. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7448324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74483242020-08-27 Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures Maleitzke, Tazio Plachel, Fabian Fleckenstein, Florian Nima Wichlas, Florian Tsitsilonis, Serafeim J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The haematoma block (HB) has been successfully used to minimise pain prior to otherwise painful closed reduction manoeuvres for distal radius fractures. However, the invasive manner of the procedure, which technically produces an open fracture, still raises the question, whether HBs increase the risk of infection compared to conventional intravenous analgesia (IA). The purpose of this study was to assess complication rates and safety of the HB procedure for the closed reduction of surgically treated distal radius fractures. METHODS: We included 176 distal radius fractures in 170 patients in a retrospective mono-centric study, who underwent closed reduction and casting followed by definitive surgical care over a period of two years. Patients either received a HB or IA before closed reduction and were evaluated for minor and major complications over a follow-up period of four years. RESULTS: Overall, 42 distal radius fractures were treated with a HB (23.9%) and 134 with IA (76.1%) before closed reduction. There were a single major (2.3%) and eight minor (19%) complications observed in the HB group compared to two major (1.4%) and 24 minor (17.9%) complications in the IA group. No significant differences were identified between the two groups. Sex and type of fracture had no effect on complication rates, however, younger patients experienced higher complication rates in comparison to older ones (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the apprehensions that clinicians may have of creating open fractures through HB procedures, are unnecessary and may be abandoned confidently. BioMed Central 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7448324/ /pubmed/32843043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01819-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maleitzke, Tazio Plachel, Fabian Fleckenstein, Florian Nima Wichlas, Florian Tsitsilonis, Serafeim Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
title | Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
title_full | Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
title_fullStr | Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
title_short | Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
title_sort | haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7448324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01819-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maleitzketazio haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures AT plachelfabian haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures AT fleckensteinfloriannima haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures AT wichlasflorian haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures AT tsitsilonisserafeim haematomablockasafemethodforpresurgicalreductionofdistalradiusfractures |