Cargando…

Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention

BACKGROUND: In the present investigation the study protocol and the results at baseline of a workplace intervention are reported. It is hypothesised that the reduction of the physical and psychosocial workload of healthcare workers increases 1 their self-assessed physical and mental work ability, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montano, Diego, Kuchenbaur, Marco, Geissler, Heinrich, Peter, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09290-4
_version_ 1783574591251152896
author Montano, Diego
Kuchenbaur, Marco
Geissler, Heinrich
Peter, Richard
author_facet Montano, Diego
Kuchenbaur, Marco
Geissler, Heinrich
Peter, Richard
author_sort Montano, Diego
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the present investigation the study protocol and the results at baseline of a workplace intervention are reported. It is hypothesised that the reduction of the physical and psychosocial workload of healthcare workers increases 1 their self-assessed physical and mental work ability, and 2. clients’ satisfaction with care. METHODS: Two-arm, cluster-randomised trial. Outcome data on workers and clients are collected in questionnaires at baseline, and two follow-ups between 2019 and 2021. Participants of the interventions are healthcare workers of 11 healthcare providers in Germany. At baseline, the intervention arm comprised 22 clusters (n = 174 workers); the control arm, 47 clusters (n = 276). The intervention consists of interviews and workshops, in which employees propose measures aiming to reduce the physical and psychosocial load, and strengthen resources at work. The primary outcome is the workers’ physical and mental work ability. The secondary outcome is the clients’ satisfaction with care. RESULTS: There was no evidence of substantial differences between trial arms at baseline concerning the outcomes. The design effect estimates for physical and mental work ability were 1.29 and 1.05, respectively. At the end of the trial, effect sizes of at least 0.30 and 0.27 at the 80% power and 5% significance levels can be attained. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the implementation of the study design has been satisfactory. The intervention is expected to provide evidence of relatively small to medium-size effects of the intervention activities on the work ability of healthcare workers and the clients’ satisfaction with care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration trial DRKS00021138 on the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS), retrospectively registered on 25 March, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74490312020-08-27 Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention Montano, Diego Kuchenbaur, Marco Geissler, Heinrich Peter, Richard BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In the present investigation the study protocol and the results at baseline of a workplace intervention are reported. It is hypothesised that the reduction of the physical and psychosocial workload of healthcare workers increases 1 their self-assessed physical and mental work ability, and 2. clients’ satisfaction with care. METHODS: Two-arm, cluster-randomised trial. Outcome data on workers and clients are collected in questionnaires at baseline, and two follow-ups between 2019 and 2021. Participants of the interventions are healthcare workers of 11 healthcare providers in Germany. At baseline, the intervention arm comprised 22 clusters (n = 174 workers); the control arm, 47 clusters (n = 276). The intervention consists of interviews and workshops, in which employees propose measures aiming to reduce the physical and psychosocial load, and strengthen resources at work. The primary outcome is the workers’ physical and mental work ability. The secondary outcome is the clients’ satisfaction with care. RESULTS: There was no evidence of substantial differences between trial arms at baseline concerning the outcomes. The design effect estimates for physical and mental work ability were 1.29 and 1.05, respectively. At the end of the trial, effect sizes of at least 0.30 and 0.27 at the 80% power and 5% significance levels can be attained. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the implementation of the study design has been satisfactory. The intervention is expected to provide evidence of relatively small to medium-size effects of the intervention activities on the work ability of healthcare workers and the clients’ satisfaction with care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration trial DRKS00021138 on the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS), retrospectively registered on 25 March, 2020. BioMed Central 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7449031/ /pubmed/32843005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09290-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Montano, Diego
Kuchenbaur, Marco
Geissler, Heinrich
Peter, Richard
Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
title Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
title_full Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
title_fullStr Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
title_full_unstemmed Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
title_short Working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
title_sort working conditions of healthcare workers and clients’ satisfaction with care: study protocol and baseline results of a cluster-randomised workplace intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09290-4
work_keys_str_mv AT montanodiego workingconditionsofhealthcareworkersandclientssatisfactionwithcarestudyprotocolandbaselineresultsofaclusterrandomisedworkplaceintervention
AT kuchenbaurmarco workingconditionsofhealthcareworkersandclientssatisfactionwithcarestudyprotocolandbaselineresultsofaclusterrandomisedworkplaceintervention
AT geisslerheinrich workingconditionsofhealthcareworkersandclientssatisfactionwithcarestudyprotocolandbaselineresultsofaclusterrandomisedworkplaceintervention
AT peterrichard workingconditionsofhealthcareworkersandclientssatisfactionwithcarestudyprotocolandbaselineresultsofaclusterrandomisedworkplaceintervention