Cargando…
Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture (AOVF). However, bilateral puncture takes more time to accept more X-ray irradiation; some scholars apply unilateral puncture PVP, but the cement cannot be sy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00436-z |
_version_ | 1783574593894612992 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yuwei Cui, Wei Zhou, Peng Li, Cheng Wen, Yan Xiao, Wei |
author_facet | Li, Yuwei Cui, Wei Zhou, Peng Li, Cheng Wen, Yan Xiao, Wei |
author_sort | Li, Yuwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture (AOVF). However, bilateral puncture takes more time to accept more X-ray irradiation; some scholars apply unilateral puncture PVP, but the cement cannot be symmetrically distributed in the vertebral body, so we use a flexible cement injector that undergoes PVP through the unilateral pedicle puncture. This research aims to compare the clinical results of PVP for AOVF with unilateral pedicle puncture using a straight bone cement injector and a bendable cement injector, determine the value of a bendable cement injector. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with thoracic and lumbar compression fracture treated with unilateral pedicle puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty from our institution from June 2013 to July 2015. Operation time, radiation exposure, bone cement injection amount, and the incidence of bone cement leakage were recorded on presentation, the cement leakage was measured by X-ray and computed tomography scan. The patients were followed up postoperatively and were assessed mainly with regard to clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the operation time, radiation exposure time and incidence of bone cement leakage between the two groups. There was significant difference in the amount of bone cement injection and the difference between the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and the relative height of the vertebral body and local Cobb angle and QUALEFFO between the two groups at 1 week after PVP, significant difference was observed only 12 months after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Application of flexible cement injector is safe and feasible, compared with the application of straight bone cement injector, without prolonging the operative time, radiation exposure time and the incidence of bone cement leakage; it has the advantages of good long-term effect and low incidence of vertebral fracture recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7449043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74490432020-08-27 Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty Li, Yuwei Cui, Wei Zhou, Peng Li, Cheng Wen, Yan Xiao, Wei Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture (AOVF). However, bilateral puncture takes more time to accept more X-ray irradiation; some scholars apply unilateral puncture PVP, but the cement cannot be symmetrically distributed in the vertebral body, so we use a flexible cement injector that undergoes PVP through the unilateral pedicle puncture. This research aims to compare the clinical results of PVP for AOVF with unilateral pedicle puncture using a straight bone cement injector and a bendable cement injector, determine the value of a bendable cement injector. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with thoracic and lumbar compression fracture treated with unilateral pedicle puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty from our institution from June 2013 to July 2015. Operation time, radiation exposure, bone cement injection amount, and the incidence of bone cement leakage were recorded on presentation, the cement leakage was measured by X-ray and computed tomography scan. The patients were followed up postoperatively and were assessed mainly with regard to clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the operation time, radiation exposure time and incidence of bone cement leakage between the two groups. There was significant difference in the amount of bone cement injection and the difference between the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and the relative height of the vertebral body and local Cobb angle and QUALEFFO between the two groups at 1 week after PVP, significant difference was observed only 12 months after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Application of flexible cement injector is safe and feasible, compared with the application of straight bone cement injector, without prolonging the operative time, radiation exposure time and the incidence of bone cement leakage; it has the advantages of good long-term effect and low incidence of vertebral fracture recurrence. BioMed Central 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7449043/ /pubmed/32843077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00436-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Yuwei Cui, Wei Zhou, Peng Li, Cheng Wen, Yan Xiao, Wei Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
title | Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
title_full | Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
title_short | Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
title_sort | comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00436-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyuwei comparisonofaflexibleversusrigidbonecementinjectionsysteminunilateralpercutaneousvertebroplasty AT cuiwei comparisonofaflexibleversusrigidbonecementinjectionsysteminunilateralpercutaneousvertebroplasty AT zhoupeng comparisonofaflexibleversusrigidbonecementinjectionsysteminunilateralpercutaneousvertebroplasty AT licheng comparisonofaflexibleversusrigidbonecementinjectionsysteminunilateralpercutaneousvertebroplasty AT wenyan comparisonofaflexibleversusrigidbonecementinjectionsysteminunilateralpercutaneousvertebroplasty AT xiaowei comparisonofaflexibleversusrigidbonecementinjectionsysteminunilateralpercutaneousvertebroplasty |