Cargando…

CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT

INTRODUCTION: Safety-netting in primary care is the best practice in cancer diagnosis, ensuring that patients are followed up until symptoms are explained or have resolved. Currently, clinicians use haphazard manual solutions. The ubiquitous use of electronic health records provides an opportunity t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleming, Susannah, Nicholson, Brian D, Bhuiya, Afsana, de Lusignan, Simon, Hirst, Yasemin, Hobbs, Richard, Perera, Rafael, Sherlock, Julian, Yonova, Ivelina, Bankhead, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038562
_version_ 1783574624220479488
author Fleming, Susannah
Nicholson, Brian D
Bhuiya, Afsana
de Lusignan, Simon
Hirst, Yasemin
Hobbs, Richard
Perera, Rafael
Sherlock, Julian
Yonova, Ivelina
Bankhead, Clare
author_facet Fleming, Susannah
Nicholson, Brian D
Bhuiya, Afsana
de Lusignan, Simon
Hirst, Yasemin
Hobbs, Richard
Perera, Rafael
Sherlock, Julian
Yonova, Ivelina
Bankhead, Clare
author_sort Fleming, Susannah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Safety-netting in primary care is the best practice in cancer diagnosis, ensuring that patients are followed up until symptoms are explained or have resolved. Currently, clinicians use haphazard manual solutions. The ubiquitous use of electronic health records provides an opportunity to standardise safety-netting practices. A new electronic safety-netting toolkit has been introduced to provide systematic ways to track and follow up patients. We will evaluate the effectiveness of this toolkit, which is embedded in a major primary care clinical system in England:Egerton Medical Information System(EMIS)-Web. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a stepped-wedge cluster RCT in 60 general practices within the RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) network. Groups of 10 practices will be randomised into the active phase at 2-monthly intervals over 12 months. All practices will be activated for at least 2 months. The primary outcome is the primary care interval measured as days between the first recorded symptom of cancer (within the year prior to diagnosis) and the subsequent referral to secondary care. Other outcomes include referrals rates and rates of direct access cancer investigation. Analysis of the clustered stepped-wedge design will model associations using a fixed effect for intervention condition of the cluster at each time step, a fixed effect for time and other covariates, and then include a random effect for practice and for patient to account for correlation between observations from the same centre and from the same participant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the North West—Greater Manchester West National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference 19/NW/0692). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences, and sent to participating practices. They will be published on the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care and RCGP RSC websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15913081; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74493092020-09-02 CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT Fleming, Susannah Nicholson, Brian D Bhuiya, Afsana de Lusignan, Simon Hirst, Yasemin Hobbs, Richard Perera, Rafael Sherlock, Julian Yonova, Ivelina Bankhead, Clare BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Safety-netting in primary care is the best practice in cancer diagnosis, ensuring that patients are followed up until symptoms are explained or have resolved. Currently, clinicians use haphazard manual solutions. The ubiquitous use of electronic health records provides an opportunity to standardise safety-netting practices. A new electronic safety-netting toolkit has been introduced to provide systematic ways to track and follow up patients. We will evaluate the effectiveness of this toolkit, which is embedded in a major primary care clinical system in England:Egerton Medical Information System(EMIS)-Web. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a stepped-wedge cluster RCT in 60 general practices within the RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) network. Groups of 10 practices will be randomised into the active phase at 2-monthly intervals over 12 months. All practices will be activated for at least 2 months. The primary outcome is the primary care interval measured as days between the first recorded symptom of cancer (within the year prior to diagnosis) and the subsequent referral to secondary care. Other outcomes include referrals rates and rates of direct access cancer investigation. Analysis of the clustered stepped-wedge design will model associations using a fixed effect for intervention condition of the cluster at each time step, a fixed effect for time and other covariates, and then include a random effect for practice and for patient to account for correlation between observations from the same centre and from the same participant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the North West—Greater Manchester West National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference 19/NW/0692). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences, and sent to participating practices. They will be published on the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care and RCGP RSC websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15913081; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7449309/ /pubmed/32843517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038562 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Fleming, Susannah
Nicholson, Brian D
Bhuiya, Afsana
de Lusignan, Simon
Hirst, Yasemin
Hobbs, Richard
Perera, Rafael
Sherlock, Julian
Yonova, Ivelina
Bankhead, Clare
CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT
title CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT
title_full CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT
title_fullStr CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT
title_full_unstemmed CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT
title_short CASNET2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge RCT
title_sort casnet2: evaluation of an electronic safety netting cancer toolkit for the primary care electronic health record: protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge rct
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038562
work_keys_str_mv AT flemingsusannah casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT nicholsonbriand casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT bhuiyaafsana casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT delusignansimon casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT hirstyasemin casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT hobbsrichard casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT pererarafael casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT sherlockjulian casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT yonovaivelina casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct
AT bankheadclare casnet2evaluationofanelectronicsafetynettingcancertoolkitfortheprimarycareelectronichealthrecordprotocolforapragmaticsteppedwedgerct