Cargando…

Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico

Spearfishing is currently the primary approach for removing invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles) to mitigate their impacts on western Atlantic marine ecosystems, but a substantial portion of lionfish spawning biomass is beyond the depth limits of SCUBA divers. Innovative technologies may offer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Holden E., Fogg, Alexander Q., Gittings, Stephen R., Ahrens, Robert N. M., Allen, Micheal S., Patterson III, William F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230985
_version_ 1783574639387082752
author Harris, Holden E.
Fogg, Alexander Q.
Gittings, Stephen R.
Ahrens, Robert N. M.
Allen, Micheal S.
Patterson III, William F.
author_facet Harris, Holden E.
Fogg, Alexander Q.
Gittings, Stephen R.
Ahrens, Robert N. M.
Allen, Micheal S.
Patterson III, William F.
author_sort Harris, Holden E.
collection PubMed
description Spearfishing is currently the primary approach for removing invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles) to mitigate their impacts on western Atlantic marine ecosystems, but a substantial portion of lionfish spawning biomass is beyond the depth limits of SCUBA divers. Innovative technologies may offer a means to target deepwater populations and allow for the development of a lionfish trap fishery, but the removal efficiency and potential environmental impacts of lionfish traps have not been evaluated. We tested a collapsible, non-containment trap (the ‘Gittings trap’) near artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. A total of 327 lionfish and 28 native fish (four were species protected with regulations) recruited (i.e., were observed within the trap footprint at the time of retrieval) to traps during 82 trap sets, catching 144 lionfish and 29 native fish (one more than recruited, indicating detection error). Lionfish recruitment was highest for single (versus paired) traps deployed <15 m from reefs with a 1-day soak time, for which mean lionfish and native fish recruitment per trap were approximately 5 and 0.1, respectively. Lionfish from traps were an average of 19 mm or 62 grams larger than those caught spearfishing. Community impacts from Gittings traps appeared minimal given that recruitment rates were >10X higher for lionfish than native fishes and that traps did not move on the bottom during two major storm events, although further testing will be necessary to test trap movement with surface floats. Additional research should also focus on design and operational modifications to improve Gittings trap deployment success (68% successfully opened on the seabed) and reduce lionfish escapement (56% escaped from traps upon retrieval). While removal efficiency for lionfish demonstrated by traps (12–24%) was far below that of spearfishing, Gittings traps appear suitable for future development and testing on deepwater natural reefs, which constitute >90% of the region’s reef habitat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74494632020-09-02 Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico Harris, Holden E. Fogg, Alexander Q. Gittings, Stephen R. Ahrens, Robert N. M. Allen, Micheal S. Patterson III, William F. PLoS One Research Article Spearfishing is currently the primary approach for removing invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles) to mitigate their impacts on western Atlantic marine ecosystems, but a substantial portion of lionfish spawning biomass is beyond the depth limits of SCUBA divers. Innovative technologies may offer a means to target deepwater populations and allow for the development of a lionfish trap fishery, but the removal efficiency and potential environmental impacts of lionfish traps have not been evaluated. We tested a collapsible, non-containment trap (the ‘Gittings trap’) near artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. A total of 327 lionfish and 28 native fish (four were species protected with regulations) recruited (i.e., were observed within the trap footprint at the time of retrieval) to traps during 82 trap sets, catching 144 lionfish and 29 native fish (one more than recruited, indicating detection error). Lionfish recruitment was highest for single (versus paired) traps deployed <15 m from reefs with a 1-day soak time, for which mean lionfish and native fish recruitment per trap were approximately 5 and 0.1, respectively. Lionfish from traps were an average of 19 mm or 62 grams larger than those caught spearfishing. Community impacts from Gittings traps appeared minimal given that recruitment rates were >10X higher for lionfish than native fishes and that traps did not move on the bottom during two major storm events, although further testing will be necessary to test trap movement with surface floats. Additional research should also focus on design and operational modifications to improve Gittings trap deployment success (68% successfully opened on the seabed) and reduce lionfish escapement (56% escaped from traps upon retrieval). While removal efficiency for lionfish demonstrated by traps (12–24%) was far below that of spearfishing, Gittings traps appear suitable for future development and testing on deepwater natural reefs, which constitute >90% of the region’s reef habitat. Public Library of Science 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7449463/ /pubmed/32845879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230985 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harris, Holden E.
Fogg, Alexander Q.
Gittings, Stephen R.
Ahrens, Robert N. M.
Allen, Micheal S.
Patterson III, William F.
Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico
title Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico
title_full Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico
title_fullStr Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico
title_short Testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern Gulf of Mexico
title_sort testing the efficacy of lionfish traps in the northern gulf of mexico
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230985
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisholdene testingtheefficacyoflionfishtrapsinthenortherngulfofmexico
AT foggalexanderq testingtheefficacyoflionfishtrapsinthenortherngulfofmexico
AT gittingsstephenr testingtheefficacyoflionfishtrapsinthenortherngulfofmexico
AT ahrensrobertnm testingtheefficacyoflionfishtrapsinthenortherngulfofmexico
AT allenmicheals testingtheefficacyoflionfishtrapsinthenortherngulfofmexico
AT pattersoniiiwilliamf testingtheefficacyoflionfishtrapsinthenortherngulfofmexico