Cargando…
Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study
BACKGROUND: As production of rapid reviews (RRs) increases in healthcare, knowing how to efficiently convey RR evidence to various end-users is important given they are often intended to directly inform decision-making. Little is known about how often RRs are produced in the published or unpublished...
Autores principales: | Garritty, Chantelle, Hersi, Mona, Hamel, Candyce, Stevens, Adrienne, Monfaredi, Zarah, Butler, Claire, Tricco, Andrea C., Hartling, Lisa, Stewart, Lesley A., Welch, Vivian, Thavorn, Kednapa, Cheng, Wei, Moher, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238025 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
por: Garritty, Chantelle, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers Caring for Patients with Filovirus Disease: A Rapid Review
por: Hersi, Mona, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review
por: Fergusson, Dean, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The handbook of journal publishing
por: Morris, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Publishing in learned journals
por: Arseculeratne, S.N.
Publicado: (2010)