Cargando…
Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
BACKGROUND: Paro and other robot animals can improve wellbeing for older adults and people with dementia, through reducing depression, agitation and medication use. However, nursing and care staff we contacted expressed infection control concerns. Little related research has been published. We asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237069 |
_version_ | 1783574642886180864 |
---|---|
author | Bradwell, Hannah Louise Johnson, Christopher W. Lee, John Winnington, Rhona Thill, Serge Jones, Ray B. |
author_facet | Bradwell, Hannah Louise Johnson, Christopher W. Lee, John Winnington, Rhona Thill, Serge Jones, Ray B. |
author_sort | Bradwell, Hannah Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Paro and other robot animals can improve wellbeing for older adults and people with dementia, through reducing depression, agitation and medication use. However, nursing and care staff we contacted expressed infection control concerns. Little related research has been published. We assessed (i) how microbiologically contaminated robot animals become during use by older people within a care home and (ii) efficacy of a cleaning procedure. METHODS: This study had two stages. In stage one we assessed microbial load on eight robot animals after interaction with four care home residents, and again following cleaning by a researcher. Robot animals provided a range of shell-types, including fur, soft plastic, and solid plastic. Stage two involved a similar process with two robot animals, but a care staff member conducted cleaning. The cleaning process involved spraying with anti-bacterial product, brushing fur-type shells, followed by vigorous top-to-tail cleaning with anti-bacterial wipes on all shell types. Two samples were taken from each of eight robots in stage one and two robots in stage two (20 samples total). Samples were collected using contact plate stamping and evaluated using aerobic colony count and identification (gram stain, colony morphology, coagulase agglutination). Colony counts were measured by colony forming units per square centimetre (CFU/cm(2)). RESULTS: Most robots acquired microbial loads well above an acceptable threshold of 2.5 CFU/cm(2) following use. The bacteria identified were micrococcus species, coagulase negative staphylococcus, diptheriods, aerobic spore bearers, and staphylococcus aureus, all of which carry risk for human health. For all devices the CFU/cm(2) reduced to well within accepted limits following cleaning by both researcher and care staff member. CONCLUSIONS: Companion robots will acquire significant levels of bacteria during normal use. The simple cleaning procedure detailed in this study reduced microbial load to acceptable levels in controlled experiments. Further work is needed in the field and to check the impact on the transmission of viruses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7449478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74494782020-09-02 Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes Bradwell, Hannah Louise Johnson, Christopher W. Lee, John Winnington, Rhona Thill, Serge Jones, Ray B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Paro and other robot animals can improve wellbeing for older adults and people with dementia, through reducing depression, agitation and medication use. However, nursing and care staff we contacted expressed infection control concerns. Little related research has been published. We assessed (i) how microbiologically contaminated robot animals become during use by older people within a care home and (ii) efficacy of a cleaning procedure. METHODS: This study had two stages. In stage one we assessed microbial load on eight robot animals after interaction with four care home residents, and again following cleaning by a researcher. Robot animals provided a range of shell-types, including fur, soft plastic, and solid plastic. Stage two involved a similar process with two robot animals, but a care staff member conducted cleaning. The cleaning process involved spraying with anti-bacterial product, brushing fur-type shells, followed by vigorous top-to-tail cleaning with anti-bacterial wipes on all shell types. Two samples were taken from each of eight robots in stage one and two robots in stage two (20 samples total). Samples were collected using contact plate stamping and evaluated using aerobic colony count and identification (gram stain, colony morphology, coagulase agglutination). Colony counts were measured by colony forming units per square centimetre (CFU/cm(2)). RESULTS: Most robots acquired microbial loads well above an acceptable threshold of 2.5 CFU/cm(2) following use. The bacteria identified were micrococcus species, coagulase negative staphylococcus, diptheriods, aerobic spore bearers, and staphylococcus aureus, all of which carry risk for human health. For all devices the CFU/cm(2) reduced to well within accepted limits following cleaning by both researcher and care staff member. CONCLUSIONS: Companion robots will acquire significant levels of bacteria during normal use. The simple cleaning procedure detailed in this study reduced microbial load to acceptable levels in controlled experiments. Further work is needed in the field and to check the impact on the transmission of viruses. Public Library of Science 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7449478/ /pubmed/32845891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237069 Text en © 2020 Bradwell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bradwell, Hannah Louise Johnson, Christopher W. Lee, John Winnington, Rhona Thill, Serge Jones, Ray B. Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
title | Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
title_full | Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
title_fullStr | Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
title_short | Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
title_sort | microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bradwellhannahlouise microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes AT johnsonchristopherw microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes AT leejohn microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes AT winningtonrhona microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes AT thillserge microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes AT jonesrayb microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes |