Cargando…

Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes

BACKGROUND: Paro and other robot animals can improve wellbeing for older adults and people with dementia, through reducing depression, agitation and medication use. However, nursing and care staff we contacted expressed infection control concerns. Little related research has been published. We asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradwell, Hannah Louise, Johnson, Christopher W., Lee, John, Winnington, Rhona, Thill, Serge, Jones, Ray B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237069
_version_ 1783574642886180864
author Bradwell, Hannah Louise
Johnson, Christopher W.
Lee, John
Winnington, Rhona
Thill, Serge
Jones, Ray B.
author_facet Bradwell, Hannah Louise
Johnson, Christopher W.
Lee, John
Winnington, Rhona
Thill, Serge
Jones, Ray B.
author_sort Bradwell, Hannah Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Paro and other robot animals can improve wellbeing for older adults and people with dementia, through reducing depression, agitation and medication use. However, nursing and care staff we contacted expressed infection control concerns. Little related research has been published. We assessed (i) how microbiologically contaminated robot animals become during use by older people within a care home and (ii) efficacy of a cleaning procedure. METHODS: This study had two stages. In stage one we assessed microbial load on eight robot animals after interaction with four care home residents, and again following cleaning by a researcher. Robot animals provided a range of shell-types, including fur, soft plastic, and solid plastic. Stage two involved a similar process with two robot animals, but a care staff member conducted cleaning. The cleaning process involved spraying with anti-bacterial product, brushing fur-type shells, followed by vigorous top-to-tail cleaning with anti-bacterial wipes on all shell types. Two samples were taken from each of eight robots in stage one and two robots in stage two (20 samples total). Samples were collected using contact plate stamping and evaluated using aerobic colony count and identification (gram stain, colony morphology, coagulase agglutination). Colony counts were measured by colony forming units per square centimetre (CFU/cm(2)). RESULTS: Most robots acquired microbial loads well above an acceptable threshold of 2.5 CFU/cm(2) following use. The bacteria identified were micrococcus species, coagulase negative staphylococcus, diptheriods, aerobic spore bearers, and staphylococcus aureus, all of which carry risk for human health. For all devices the CFU/cm(2) reduced to well within accepted limits following cleaning by both researcher and care staff member. CONCLUSIONS: Companion robots will acquire significant levels of bacteria during normal use. The simple cleaning procedure detailed in this study reduced microbial load to acceptable levels in controlled experiments. Further work is needed in the field and to check the impact on the transmission of viruses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74494782020-09-02 Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes Bradwell, Hannah Louise Johnson, Christopher W. Lee, John Winnington, Rhona Thill, Serge Jones, Ray B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Paro and other robot animals can improve wellbeing for older adults and people with dementia, through reducing depression, agitation and medication use. However, nursing and care staff we contacted expressed infection control concerns. Little related research has been published. We assessed (i) how microbiologically contaminated robot animals become during use by older people within a care home and (ii) efficacy of a cleaning procedure. METHODS: This study had two stages. In stage one we assessed microbial load on eight robot animals after interaction with four care home residents, and again following cleaning by a researcher. Robot animals provided a range of shell-types, including fur, soft plastic, and solid plastic. Stage two involved a similar process with two robot animals, but a care staff member conducted cleaning. The cleaning process involved spraying with anti-bacterial product, brushing fur-type shells, followed by vigorous top-to-tail cleaning with anti-bacterial wipes on all shell types. Two samples were taken from each of eight robots in stage one and two robots in stage two (20 samples total). Samples were collected using contact plate stamping and evaluated using aerobic colony count and identification (gram stain, colony morphology, coagulase agglutination). Colony counts were measured by colony forming units per square centimetre (CFU/cm(2)). RESULTS: Most robots acquired microbial loads well above an acceptable threshold of 2.5 CFU/cm(2) following use. The bacteria identified were micrococcus species, coagulase negative staphylococcus, diptheriods, aerobic spore bearers, and staphylococcus aureus, all of which carry risk for human health. For all devices the CFU/cm(2) reduced to well within accepted limits following cleaning by both researcher and care staff member. CONCLUSIONS: Companion robots will acquire significant levels of bacteria during normal use. The simple cleaning procedure detailed in this study reduced microbial load to acceptable levels in controlled experiments. Further work is needed in the field and to check the impact on the transmission of viruses. Public Library of Science 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7449478/ /pubmed/32845891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237069 Text en © 2020 Bradwell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bradwell, Hannah Louise
Johnson, Christopher W.
Lee, John
Winnington, Rhona
Thill, Serge
Jones, Ray B.
Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
title Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
title_full Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
title_fullStr Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
title_full_unstemmed Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
title_short Microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
title_sort microbial contamination and efficacy of disinfection procedures of companion robots in care homes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237069
work_keys_str_mv AT bradwellhannahlouise microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes
AT johnsonchristopherw microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes
AT leejohn microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes
AT winningtonrhona microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes
AT thillserge microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes
AT jonesrayb microbialcontaminationandefficacyofdisinfectionproceduresofcompanionrobotsincarehomes