Cargando…

Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?

Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jim, Hoi-Lam, Marshall-Pescini, Sarah, Range, Friederike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373
_version_ 1783574643112673280
author Jim, Hoi-Lam
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
author_facet Jim, Hoi-Lam
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
author_sort Jim, Hoi-Lam
collection PubMed
description Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found that dogs preferred a human who acted generously or cooperatively towards another human over one who acted selfishly or non-cooperatively, however they often did not control for potential location biases. This study controlled for local enhancement and investigated whether dogs derive and act on information about unfamiliar humans through reputation-like inferences by observing third-party interactions. 42 dogs participated in the experiment, which consisted of an observation phase and a test phase. In the observation phase, the animals observed a human with a box of food ask for help to open it from two people—one was helpful and the other was not. The test phase consisted of the impossible task and a choice test. Half of the sample was tested in the experimental condition and the other half was tested in the side control condition, where the two people swapped positions before the test phase. The results of the impossible task showed that dogs only looked at the helpful person first when the people stayed on the same side as they did in the observation phase. In the choice test, dogs chose at random, regardless of whether the people stayed on the same side or swapped positions. Our findings provide tentative support for a local enhancement interpretation of eavesdropping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74494792020-09-02 Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? Jim, Hoi-Lam Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike PLoS One Research Article Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found that dogs preferred a human who acted generously or cooperatively towards another human over one who acted selfishly or non-cooperatively, however they often did not control for potential location biases. This study controlled for local enhancement and investigated whether dogs derive and act on information about unfamiliar humans through reputation-like inferences by observing third-party interactions. 42 dogs participated in the experiment, which consisted of an observation phase and a test phase. In the observation phase, the animals observed a human with a box of food ask for help to open it from two people—one was helpful and the other was not. The test phase consisted of the impossible task and a choice test. Half of the sample was tested in the experimental condition and the other half was tested in the side control condition, where the two people swapped positions before the test phase. The results of the impossible task showed that dogs only looked at the helpful person first when the people stayed on the same side as they did in the observation phase. In the choice test, dogs chose at random, regardless of whether the people stayed on the same side or swapped positions. Our findings provide tentative support for a local enhancement interpretation of eavesdropping. Public Library of Science 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7449479/ /pubmed/32845903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373 Text en © 2020 Jim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jim, Hoi-Lam
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_full Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_fullStr Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_full_unstemmed Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_short Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_sort do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373
work_keys_str_mv AT jimhoilam dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation
AT marshallpescinisarah dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation
AT rangefriederike dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation