Cargando…

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions

To study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes. We used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kucharik, Marcel, Gnip, Andrej, Hyblova, Michaela, Budis, Jaroslav, Strieskova, Lucia, Harsanyova, Maria, Pös, Ondrej, Kubiritova, Zuzana, Radvanszky, Jan, Minarik, Gabriel, Szemes, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238245
_version_ 1783574644500987904
author Kucharik, Marcel
Gnip, Andrej
Hyblova, Michaela
Budis, Jaroslav
Strieskova, Lucia
Harsanyova, Maria
Pös, Ondrej
Kubiritova, Zuzana
Radvanszky, Jan
Minarik, Gabriel
Szemes, Tomas
author_facet Kucharik, Marcel
Gnip, Andrej
Hyblova, Michaela
Budis, Jaroslav
Strieskova, Lucia
Harsanyova, Maria
Pös, Ondrej
Kubiritova, Zuzana
Radvanszky, Jan
Minarik, Gabriel
Szemes, Tomas
author_sort Kucharik, Marcel
collection PubMed
description To study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes. We used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database to specifically define regions critical for the target syndromes. Our approach to detect microdeletions, from whole genome sequencing data, is based on sample normalization and read counting for individual bins. We performed both an in-silico study using artificially created data sets and a laboratory test on mixed DNA samples, with known microdeletions, to assess the sensitivity of prediction for varying fetal fractions, deletion lengths, and sequencing read counts. The in-silico study showed sensitivity of 79.3% for 10% fetal fraction with 20M read count, which further increased to 98.4% if we searched only for deletions longer than 3Mb. The test on laboratory-prepared mixed samples was in agreement with in-silico results, while we were able to correctly detect 24 out of 29 control samples. Our results suggest that it is possible to incorporate microaberration detection into basic NIPT as part of the offered screening/diagnostics procedure, however, accuracy and reliability depends on several specific factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7449492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74494922020-09-02 Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions Kucharik, Marcel Gnip, Andrej Hyblova, Michaela Budis, Jaroslav Strieskova, Lucia Harsanyova, Maria Pös, Ondrej Kubiritova, Zuzana Radvanszky, Jan Minarik, Gabriel Szemes, Tomas PLoS One Research Article To study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes. We used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database to specifically define regions critical for the target syndromes. Our approach to detect microdeletions, from whole genome sequencing data, is based on sample normalization and read counting for individual bins. We performed both an in-silico study using artificially created data sets and a laboratory test on mixed DNA samples, with known microdeletions, to assess the sensitivity of prediction for varying fetal fractions, deletion lengths, and sequencing read counts. The in-silico study showed sensitivity of 79.3% for 10% fetal fraction with 20M read count, which further increased to 98.4% if we searched only for deletions longer than 3Mb. The test on laboratory-prepared mixed samples was in agreement with in-silico results, while we were able to correctly detect 24 out of 29 control samples. Our results suggest that it is possible to incorporate microaberration detection into basic NIPT as part of the offered screening/diagnostics procedure, however, accuracy and reliability depends on several specific factors. Public Library of Science 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7449492/ /pubmed/32845907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238245 Text en © 2020 Kucharik et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kucharik, Marcel
Gnip, Andrej
Hyblova, Michaela
Budis, Jaroslav
Strieskova, Lucia
Harsanyova, Maria
Pös, Ondrej
Kubiritova, Zuzana
Radvanszky, Jan
Minarik, Gabriel
Szemes, Tomas
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
title Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
title_full Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
title_fullStr Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
title_short Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
title_sort non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt) by low coverage genomic sequencing: detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238245
work_keys_str_mv AT kucharikmarcel noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT gnipandrej noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT hyblovamichaela noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT budisjaroslav noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT strieskovalucia noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT harsanyovamaria noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT posondrej noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT kubiritovazuzana noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT radvanszkyjan noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT minarikgabriel noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions
AT szemestomas noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions