Cargando…
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions
To study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes. We used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238245 |
_version_ | 1783574644500987904 |
---|---|
author | Kucharik, Marcel Gnip, Andrej Hyblova, Michaela Budis, Jaroslav Strieskova, Lucia Harsanyova, Maria Pös, Ondrej Kubiritova, Zuzana Radvanszky, Jan Minarik, Gabriel Szemes, Tomas |
author_facet | Kucharik, Marcel Gnip, Andrej Hyblova, Michaela Budis, Jaroslav Strieskova, Lucia Harsanyova, Maria Pös, Ondrej Kubiritova, Zuzana Radvanszky, Jan Minarik, Gabriel Szemes, Tomas |
author_sort | Kucharik, Marcel |
collection | PubMed |
description | To study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes. We used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database to specifically define regions critical for the target syndromes. Our approach to detect microdeletions, from whole genome sequencing data, is based on sample normalization and read counting for individual bins. We performed both an in-silico study using artificially created data sets and a laboratory test on mixed DNA samples, with known microdeletions, to assess the sensitivity of prediction for varying fetal fractions, deletion lengths, and sequencing read counts. The in-silico study showed sensitivity of 79.3% for 10% fetal fraction with 20M read count, which further increased to 98.4% if we searched only for deletions longer than 3Mb. The test on laboratory-prepared mixed samples was in agreement with in-silico results, while we were able to correctly detect 24 out of 29 control samples. Our results suggest that it is possible to incorporate microaberration detection into basic NIPT as part of the offered screening/diagnostics procedure, however, accuracy and reliability depends on several specific factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7449492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74494922020-09-02 Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions Kucharik, Marcel Gnip, Andrej Hyblova, Michaela Budis, Jaroslav Strieskova, Lucia Harsanyova, Maria Pös, Ondrej Kubiritova, Zuzana Radvanszky, Jan Minarik, Gabriel Szemes, Tomas PLoS One Research Article To study the detection limits of chromosomal microaberrations in non-invasive prenatal testing with aim for five target microdeletion syndromes, including DiGeorge, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, Cri-Du-Chat, and Wolf-Hirschhorn syndromes. We used known cases of pathogenic deletions from ISCA database to specifically define regions critical for the target syndromes. Our approach to detect microdeletions, from whole genome sequencing data, is based on sample normalization and read counting for individual bins. We performed both an in-silico study using artificially created data sets and a laboratory test on mixed DNA samples, with known microdeletions, to assess the sensitivity of prediction for varying fetal fractions, deletion lengths, and sequencing read counts. The in-silico study showed sensitivity of 79.3% for 10% fetal fraction with 20M read count, which further increased to 98.4% if we searched only for deletions longer than 3Mb. The test on laboratory-prepared mixed samples was in agreement with in-silico results, while we were able to correctly detect 24 out of 29 control samples. Our results suggest that it is possible to incorporate microaberration detection into basic NIPT as part of the offered screening/diagnostics procedure, however, accuracy and reliability depends on several specific factors. Public Library of Science 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7449492/ /pubmed/32845907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238245 Text en © 2020 Kucharik et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kucharik, Marcel Gnip, Andrej Hyblova, Michaela Budis, Jaroslav Strieskova, Lucia Harsanyova, Maria Pös, Ondrej Kubiritova, Zuzana Radvanszky, Jan Minarik, Gabriel Szemes, Tomas Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
title | Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
title_full | Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
title_short | Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by low coverage genomic sequencing: Detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
title_sort | non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt) by low coverage genomic sequencing: detection limits of screened chromosomal microdeletions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32845907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kucharikmarcel noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT gnipandrej noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT hyblovamichaela noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT budisjaroslav noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT strieskovalucia noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT harsanyovamaria noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT posondrej noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT kubiritovazuzana noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT radvanszkyjan noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT minarikgabriel noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions AT szemestomas noninvasiveprenataltestingniptbylowcoveragegenomicsequencingdetectionlimitsofscreenedchromosomalmicrodeletions |