Cargando…

MRP8/14 and neutrophil elastase for predicting treatment response and occurrence of flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To study two neutrophil activation markers, myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8/14 and neutrophil elastase (NE), for their ability to predict treatment response and flare in patients with JIA. METHODS: Using samples from two cohorts (I and II), we determined MRP8/14 and NE levels of 32 (I) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barendregt, Anouk M, Veldkamp, Saskia R, Hissink Muller, Petra C E, van de Geer, Annemarie, Aarts, Cathelijn, van Gulik, E Charlotte, Schilham, Marco W, Kessel, Christoph, Keizer, Mischa P, Hemke, Robert, Nassar-Sheikh Rashid, Amara, Dolman, Koert M, Schonenberg-Meinema, Dieneke, ten Cate, Rebecca, van den Berg, J Merlijn, Maas, Mario, Kuijpers, Taco W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31904851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez590
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To study two neutrophil activation markers, myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8/14 and neutrophil elastase (NE), for their ability to predict treatment response and flare in patients with JIA. METHODS: Using samples from two cohorts (I and II), we determined MRP8/14 and NE levels of 32 (I) and 81 (II) patients with new-onset, DMARD-naïve arthritis and compared patients who responded to treatment (defined as fulfilling ≥ adjusted ACRpedi50 response and/or inactive disease) with non-responders (defined as fulfilling < adjusted ACRpedi50 response and/or active disease) at 6 and 12 months. Secondly, we compared biomarker levels of 54 (I) and 34 (II) patients with clinically inactive disease who did or did not suffer from a flare of arthritis after 6 or 12 months. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were carried out to study the predictive value of MRP8/14 and NE for treatment response and flare. RESULTS: For both cohorts, baseline MRP8/14 and NE levels for patients who did or did not respond to treatment were not different. Also, MRP8/14 and NE levels were not different in patients who did or did not flare. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of MRP8/14 and NE demonstrated areas under the curve <0.7 in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: In our cohorts, MRP8/14 and NE could not predict treatment response. Also, when patients had inactive disease, neither marker could predict flares.